Відео

Your example, like the violinist example, lacks the aspect of purposely engaging in an act that creates needy human beings, so it fails in that regard.

​@@skolix909 i think that's a strength in it actually because it shows if we have the knowledge that there is a person existing in a circumstance, then we cannot justify harming them in the ways similar to abortion. its like my pro life violinist argument, but it still rests upon the idea that the being is a person, so it wont work for everyone

@@LBoomsky oh. Your saying that we would not have the right to kill the stomach clone?

​@@skolix909 Yeah, I think we shouldn't have the right to kill the stomach clone. i'm probably not gonna use this argument cuz it doesn't really satisfy anyone lol its just a little bit out there

@@LBoomsky ah ok lol yeah I thought you thought that we could kill it. I think it’s a little weak because it doesn’t show a moral obligation to not kill the stomach clone, just that it would be nice to do so. I think

1. A pregnancy does not require the woman to be the mother of her offspring through their entire child life. A pregnancy lasts roughly 9 months. A foetus' future could very well last numerous decades. If we're evaluating based on the potential future of each, they aren't very comparable 2. If there were means for unwanted foetuses at large to be preserved and developed into infants (incubators for those stages of life), I would be emphatically pro-life. But as it stands, it's the unborn's presumed right to life vs the pregnant person's right to liberty within reason

@@andocommando3071 Don Marquis & this youtube video attempt to answer the question "Is abortion morally permissible?" by providing an answer other than "the right to life". Marquis says that abortion is wrong bc it deprives the unborn of their future like ours. By that reasoning, isn't it true that - if carrying the pregnancy to term would deprive the mother of her own future like ours - then carrying the pregnancy to term would itself be immoral?

@@andocommando3071 For instance, what if a 12 yr old girl & her 14 yr boyfriend have sex & get pregnant? what if they even used protection, but the protection failed? what if carrying the pregnancy to term would deprive the mother (a 12 yr old) of her future like ours? yes, it is true that abortion would deprive the unborn of their future like ours, but are we supposed to compare the values of lives? what is the value of the future of a 12yr old girl? how is marquis's "future like ours" deprivation-based argument supposed to account for this?