Відео

Experiments now show that the speed of light is not a constant, as once thought, and this has extraordinary implications to Relativity, Gravity, Quantum Mechanics, and even Quantum Field Theory. Hi, my name is Dr. William Walker and I am a PhD physicist with over 30 experience on this topic, and was the topic of my thesis at ETH. The speed of light is not a constant speed as once thought, and this has now been proved by Electrodynamic theory. EM simulations, and by Experiments done by many independent researchers. The results clearly show that light propagates instantaneously when it is created by a source, and reduces to approximately the speed of light in the farfield, about one wavelength from the source, and never becomes equal to exactly c. This corresponds the phase speed, group speed, and information speed. Any theory assuming the speed of light is a constant, such as Special Relativity and General Relativity are wrong, and it has implications to Quantum theories as well. So this fact about the speed of light affects all of Modern Physics. Often it is stated that Relativity has been verified by so many experiments, how can it be wrong. Well no experiment can prove a theory, and can only provide evidence that a theory is correct. But one experiment can absolutely disprove a theory, and the new speed of light experiments proving the speed of light is not a constant is such a proof. So what does it mean? Well a derivation of Relativity using instantaneous nearfield light yields Galilean Relativity. This can easily seen by inserting c=infinity into the Lorentz Transform, yielding the Galilean Transform, where time is the same in all inertial frames. So a moving object observed with instantaneous nearfield light will yield no Relativistic effects, whereas by changing the frequency of the light such that farfield light is used will observe Relativistic effects. But since time and space are real and independent of the frequency of light used to measure its effects, then one must conclude the effects of Relativity are just an optical illusion. Since General Relativity is based on Special Relativity, then it has the same problem. A better theory of Gravity is Gravitoelectromagnetism which assumes gravity can be mathematically described by 4 Maxwell equations, similar to to those of electromagnetic theory. It is well known that General Relativity reduces to Gravitoelectromagnetism for weak fields, which is all that we observe. Using this theory, analysis of an oscillating mass yields a wave equation set equal to a source term. Analysis of this equation shows that the phase speed, group speed, and information speed are instantaneous in the nearfield and reduce to the speed of light in the farfield. This theory then accounts for all the observed gravitational effects including instantaneous nearfield and the speed of light farfield. The main difference is that this theory is a field theory, and not a geometrical theory like General Relativity. Because it is a field theory, Gravity can be then be quantized as the Graviton. Lastly it should be mentioned that this research shows that the Pilot Wave interpretation of Quantum Mechanics can no longer be criticized for requiring instantaneous interaction of the pilot wave, thereby violating Relativity. It should also be noted that nearfield electromagnetic fields can be explained by quantum mechanics using the Pilot Wave interpretation of quantum mechanics and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle (HUP), where Δx and Δp are interpreted as averages, and not the uncertainty in the values as in other interpretations of quantum mechanics. So in HUP: Δx Δp = h, where Δp=mΔv, and m is an effective mass due to momentum, thus HUP becomes: Δx Δv = h/m. In the nearfield where the field is created, Δx=0, therefore Δv=infinity. In the farfield, HUP: Δx Δp = h, where p = h/λ. HUP then becomes: Δx h/λ = h, or Δx=λ. Also in the farfield HUP becomes: λmΔv=h, thus Δv=h/(mλ). Since p=h/λ, then Δv=p/m. Also since p=mc, then Δv=c. So in summary, in the nearfield Δv=infinity, and in the farfield Δv=c, where Δv is the average velocity of the photon according to Pilot Wave theory. Consequently the Pilot wave interpretation should become the preferred interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. It should also be noted that this argument can be applied to all fields, including the graviton. Hence all fields should exhibit instantaneous nearfield and speed c farfield behavior, and this can explain the non-local effects observed in quantum entangled particles. *UA-cam presentation of above arguments: ua-cam.com/video/sePdJ7vSQvQ/v-deo.html *More extensive paper for the above arguments: William D. Walker and Dag Stranneby, A New Interpretation of Relativity, 2023: vixra.org/abs/2309.0145 *Electromagnetic pulse experiment paper: www.techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.36227/techrxiv.170862178.82175798/v1 Dr. William Walker - PhD in physics from ETH Zurich, 1997

"Splitter", not "splinter"

When truth goes through an appropriately narrow mind, it is scattered and even shows wave-like qualities and… truth does not spread in a straight line anymore

Everyday reality: the cat exists and is something but it died and overtime we observed it decompose into nothing. So can the existence be reverse engineered? Can something come from nothing? Possible maybe but probable? Absolutely not! How could something come out of nothing? Quantum reality: no everyday language of our spectral duality wont do! It's to simple. The questions are more like how did something x and nothing y come out of what z?now you get the despairing sense of what our curiosity is up against when it comes to fundamental knowledge of existence. It requires a level of sanity and imagination that the question implies is beyond our understanding. It's like feeling an invisible wall. Not glass but an invisible wall that leaves us feeling confounded even though we know the invisible wall is there. We just have no idea what it is that is stopping us. We need instances of scientific discovery that inspire hope if our science is to live to see any profound truth of existence.

Very understandable.. but. Taking all the direction arrows, add them up, cancel the matching ones out, place the arrows remaining in a line, square it up and you get probability.. what determines the length of the arrow? Why the arrowhead with 3 following dots.. why not 4 or 2? Which then would change the size of the square. I'm sure it's something simple that I missed or didn't understand. Anyways, thanks for the content.. fascinating

There is only one particle that is also a wave and that is a corkscrew. We keep being shown these 2D wave images but nothing in 3D exists as truly flat.

How about we start from the beginning: What is space? Once we know that, we'll probably get light for free.

15:27

Radio waves, of which visible light is just a frequency band are accepted to be waves and can be demonstrated simply by looking at a received signal on an oscilliscope, so why the big argument about visible light

you just regurgitated current belief, a set of garbage you have been fed by ignorant..so you have no clue what light is. how and where it is generated and what make it travel and do it in straight line. LIGHT is a series of photon. photon is a particle with complex disk shape structure. mankind technology is not able to see it. I have schematic drawing of it in my page.My answer is based on real physics using alien technology, It may not fit yours. I pay 100,000 chine’s Yuan to any one charity proving me wrong. Scientist are stupid and western world leaders do not have the back boon, ball, intelligence or power to order their scientist to prove me wrong and expose their lies past 63 years. So currently over 90% of physic is fiction and lies continue.

Please consider either using subtitles OR overdubbing. I fail to see any advantage of overdubbing over the original *with the original sound still playing in the background*. It is deeply annoying and distracting.

*splitter

What "exactly" is anything?

Photons are both particle and a wave.

A force between electrons that acts instantly and infinitely. You simply do not understand time properly.

Excels clarity. Thank you

Incredible work. What a great video! I love studying stuff about physics and light. I took two optics classes in college and now have a bachelors degree in physics. I wish I could work on stuff like this but this looks like phd work.

I saw this video yesterday ua-cam.com/video/U-AJhI8ll7U/v-deo.htmlsi=01wPdZ8leEz_3cSz

Light is invisible. Cant see it unless it is seperated through a prism or when it reflects off a surface..

*This is not the original video.* The channel "QuantumFracture" posted this same video but with a Spanish narrator. This channel (IFIMAC) simply posted a version with English translations. This video was not stollen, rather, IFIMAC is probably in collaboration with the original channel QuantumFracture, and thus has permission. The original video has 2.8 million views right now (7/2/2024), so this video got the recognition it deserved.

Wow i didnt know this video

cool

El futuro es muy prometedor con estas estudiantes. Gracias por vuestra labor.

Amazing

is this a stolen video?

Porque el título es en ingles cuando el contenido es en Español??

Know what i'm saying@ the title.

thanks

Algún día

Absolutely brilliant video. Seen so many videos on this topic. This is the only one that is intuitive. Thanks.

Nice examples

Aliens know this, and this is precisely what they're manipulating with photons and nuclear atomic particles

To the writer of the script: Engough with those cringe 'jokes'. Please, stop it; get some help.

Good video ! Good luck Carlos. Single photon source forever !

Sad that all these super properties will never be achievable for any usage.

Amazing

Basically we're not even real. We're a simulation. Superior multi-dimensional beings use gravitational forces which operate like a sketch board to shape the universe. Light is the image we see when we interpret the forces through our instruments or our eyes.

I never heard of Superfluid, nice.

Awesome! Surprised this is overlooked.

Quiero saber más de la Física de la materia condensada

so you have no idea of atom structure and how it function. you just repeat base on current agreed assumption,

pr໐๓໐Ş๓ 😃

700th subscriber

Siempre he tenido fascinación por temas de cosmología o física de partículas. Pero recientemente he notado que la física de la materia condensada es igual de relevante. Hace falta mucha más divulgación al respecto.

Amazing!

EXCELENTE VIDEO PROMOCIONAL. ME AYUDÒ BASTANTE EN EL CURSO DE FISICA DE LA MATERIA CONDENSADA QUE DICTO.

🌷 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘮

Enhorabuena, FJ! Entrañable vídeo.

Vamos a ser testigos de cosas muy buenas en las próximas décadas, ojalá toda la vida fuera esto, progreso.

Thanks for this video.... It is great... Animation is best and it helps me a lot to understand the concept in a easy way :-)