Відео

James White is well known as a Reformed Theologian. His Dividing Line ministry has been a blessing to many Christians. His debates are founded upon biblical revelation. It has been said that Theology is the Queen of the Sciences. The study of the biblical God, is a wise profession. Theology matters because it is a study of WHY we believe WHAT we believe. God bless.

Notice how Dr White spoke of the Bible his entire opening and how Abdullah is talking solely about the bible not the quran in his.

One can easily tell that Abdullah is a liar. Off the bet from both their opening statements.

abdulah is stupider than the avg five year old, barely fluent, shaking when his grift is exposed and lying like a dog.

abdulah is a pedophile worshipper that should be exiled or deported, ISLAM IS CANCER

What is the website called for the variations ?

Excellent!!!!!

This abdulah doesn't match to debate Dr. James white

Poor Abdullah!

What would you do as Muslims if Christianity was the correct religion? After you turned the Paraclete (the Holy Spirit) into a prophet and a book of poetry, sorcery and jinn ? While Jesus said that every sin is forgiven, except blasphemy against the Holy Spirit? Will you crying like the crying of the foolish virgins in BARZAKH for the door of the Kingdom of the Holy Trinity to be openned for you ?????????????????

Abdulah Hamimi need to read more on Christian manuscripts

يا جيمس ليس القران وحده من يحرم الشرك ويقول انه لا يغتفر كتابك المقدس خاصة العهد القديم طافح بهذا الموضوع

The New Testament jesus in the Light of Old Testament is an impostor a Liar and some people also called him Lunatic and christian missionaries believe that the opposite word for Lunatic is God so jesus is a god

Thank you!

Both of you, you must read the books of Christian Prince about Islam

Quran was gathered after 300 years after the death of there profite

They casually decided to use the coldest photo ever taken of James White in their thumbnail 🔥 G-d bless Dr White a true man of G-d.

anyone with a brain capable of critical thought can see the problems with oral transmission and even transmission in general. Also, the muslim gentleman does not refute the christians claims of the inconsistencies within the quran but then goes to say they don’t exist?

Maybe the laziest of people to debate James White that I have seen.

“an ahistorical understanding”, was it? Some other time it was “a minimalist understanding”. I’m glad to know he has a very good library, but it’s hard to hear White’s points over his insistence that everyone but him has yet to master sitting upright. This time he struck me as Paul vs Jerusalem, insisting on his own legitimacy. Why? No one doubts his erudition. Strange, because in one interview he seemed super personable.

So what I got from James white is that “we don’t have the originals” And what we have is basically still being constructed and trying to be closer to what could/can be “original” SINCE WE DONT have the originals. This is absolutely ridiculous way of believing as a rational being is that believing or taking a book to be as a Salvation for hereafter, just so foolish. That’s the mess you have from a “free transmission” as compared to a controlled transmission for Qur’an compilation Orally & in written form. What I memorized as 8 or 9 year old from Qur’an I still know it verbatim. Imagine we recite 5 times a day, we finish entire Qur’an from memory in mosques, there’s a Qur’an. Memorization conference & competitions each year (where thousands of memorizers participate) imagine all that. It’s a tradition so rich and that’s how we know it was preserved perfectly as God mentioned in Qur’an. Pretty good debate, James white need to learn a bit more on “Sciences of Ahadith” and Sabat Ah’ruf.

The Quran is immoral. Eg how can allah promise someone with an endless pen*s with 70 years of orgasm?

Please dont worship Jesus. Jesus is muslim, a man from Palestine

1:19:28 james white is absolutely right. Abdulah sets up a standard for the texts that neither the quran or the bible lives up to, and then says that the christians can rely on the NT because it doesn't live up to that standrad. Why should I believe anything that the quran has to say about Jesus when it's a source 600 years removed. No scholar would accept that.

James White still on his sly tactics from "same standards" James White is not a good scholar he is good at dodging and steering a debate away from the focus point, that is all he ever does in all of his debates and he perfected the art of dodging, and has by his own words over various debates even contradict himself.

Debates are just mad. Its all about l know more than you syndrome.🤫 besides that james white is very tricky 🫣

A Muslim apologists vs a Christian apologists without fail, gets destroyed. Without LIES, Islam DIES

WHAT IS THE PROVE THAT ISLAM IS TRUE RELIGION AND CHRISTIANITY IS FALSE?.... Well, without a shadow of doubt, Christianity is a flawed religion with lots of contradictions a d paradoxes. How can a religion denied its core doctrines and Main b3lief systems. John 14:28: "My father is greater than l But the Christians respond that Father is Greater, and Jesus is his human son/God. But if they are all co-equal and eternal, how can one be Greater? PARADOX. John 5:30: " I cannot do anything on my own except what I hear from my Father...." But the Christians respond that Jesus is God, so how can he not follow his own will, but that of his father is they both have the same will? PARADOX. Matthew 24:36: "OF that day and hour(judgment day), no one knows, not the angels nor the son, but only God... The Christians respond that Jesus is God and omniscient, so how can he not know? This would only means that Jesus is not telling the truth, which I don't believe, or he is not God, which in that case he doesn't know....PARADOX. John 5:19: Verily Verily am telling you the truth, the son cannot do anything except what his father does.. Again, the son is dependent upon the Father, but then the Christians respond that the son is the father too, and we know that God is independent of Himself. Hmmm, why should God make His religion so complex?? The word Christianity is not in the Bible, the word Bible is not in the Bible. Christ never for once in his entire sojourn on earth ever say: I am a Christian. Christianity was created by Paul, long after Jesus left the earth. Jesus never heard of the word Christianity in his life. Paul wrote more than half of the new Testament. Paul write 14 books out of the 27 books of the Bible. Christ never pen a single statement. Why did Jesus need to die to neutralize the curse of mankind, when God is capable of Forgiving His servants. The human sacrifice was started by the pagan Greeks and Roman's. Abraham brought the end of human sacrifice by substituting with a ram. Islam on the other hand is a simple rational unambiguous religion without any paganistic elements in it. One God, One humanity, One religion subscribed by all Prophets and Messengers. Mohammad is the culmination of the earlier Prophets. Submitting to the will of the Creator sheikh Mohammed Awal ZDI

What worries me about his conviction of the three person godhead is that this is not even consensus among Christian sects, and is a well-known later development that Islamic apologist rightly identify. As a Christian, I find myself agreeing with them.

Thank you pastor courtis! I am preaching through John right now as well!

Yeah Mr white has a Point here, especially when god said in John Cap. 8 | NIV-EN 17 In your own Law it is written that the testimony of two witnesses is true. And since we the bible is a free transmition on over then 40 diferent outhor talking about the one big event wich is Christ that gives a more acurrate valid point to the message .

Islam ☪️ 🕋 cult is been exposed 😊

Abdulah Hamimi get destroyed !! ahhahaahah

This guy came to a debate on textual criticism without prior knowledge of free transmission of the New Testament? And against James White? Lol.

GOD BECAME MAN, SO THAT MAN MIGHT BECOME GOD. Saint Athanasius of Alexandria.

ARARIMU.....CORRECT..

NOW IF CHRIST IS PROCLAIMED AS RAISED FROM THE DEAD, HOW CAN SOME OF YOU SAY THERE IS NO RESURRECTION OF THE DEAD? THAT'S ALL HUMANITY : YOU AND ME !

Recitation is different readings, doesn't change the meaning

Thanks God for Islam ❤❤❤❤

THE TRANSMISSION OF THE QUR’AN What about the Qur'an? Has its preservation also been compromised? The author of the Qur'an makes a bold claim: “We have sent down the Qur’an Ourself, and We Ourself will guard it” [15:9]. God blessed His final revelation, the Qur’an, with something that was not bestowed on any of the prior scriptures: He promised to protect and preserve it from any corruption. You might be wondering how such a bold claim can be true in the light of what we know about the consistent corruption of previous religious scriptures throughout history, including the New Testament. Unlike other scriptures, the primary means of preserving the Qur’an has, and always will be, through memorisation: “And We have certainly made the Qur’an easy for remembrance, so is there any who will remember?” [54:17]. Is memorisation really a practical way of preserving the Qur’an? One of the ways that God made the Qur’an easy to remember is the unique style of the Qur’an itself; it has a rhyming style much like poetry. Have a think back to when you were at school. Most of us have probably forgotten many of the finer details of what we learnt at school, such as the dates of various events we studied in subjects like History, or the formulas and equations we learnt in subjects like Mathematics and Physics. This is because we haven’t used the knowledge since leaving school and human beings naturally forget things over time. What’s interesting is that many of us can easily recall the words of the nursery rhymes we used to sing in school, or even the lyrics of a song we haven’t listened to in years. The difference is that the words of nursery rhymes and the lyrics of songs have a certain rhyme and rhythm that allows us to easily recall the information even without making a conscious effort to remember it. Much in the same way, the Qur’an rhymes like poetry and has a strong rhythm, making it easy to memorise. The Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم was tasked by God with memorising, transmitting and explaining the verses of the Qur’an to the Muslims, as they were revealed from God to him through the angel Gabriel: “Truly, this Qur'an has been sent down by the Lord of the Worlds: the Trustworthy Spirit [angel Gabriel] brought it down to your heart [Prophet], so that you could bring warning” [26:192-194]. In turn, these Muslims who had learnt the Qur'an directly from the Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم himself, known as the Companions, passed on what they had memorised to neighbouring tribes and nations. It must be re-highlighted here that the Qur’an was revealed gradually to the Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم over a period of 23 years: The disbelievers also say, ‘Why was the Qur'an not sent down to him all at once?’ We sent it in this way to strengthen your heart [Prophet]; We gave it to you in gradual revelation. [25:32] Gradual revelation facilitated the memorisation of the Qur’an by the early Muslims at large. It should be noted that the revelations of previous Prophets, such as Moses, were not gradual but rather given all at once. The Qur’an informs us about Moses: We inscribed everything for him in the Tablets which taught and explained everything, saying, ‘Hold on to them firmly and urge your people to hold fast to their excellent teachings. I will show you the end of those who rebel.’ [7:145] This legacy of mass memorisation has continued throughout Islamic history. Muslims today have no doubt about the perfect preservation of the Qur’an. This oral tradition spanning nearly 1,500 years has seen the Qur’an being passed down from teacher to student in an unbroken chain going all the way back to the Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم himself. Today, it is estimated there are many millions of Muslims who have memorised the entire Qur'an, from cover to cover, in its original Arabic. This is a testament to the promise made by God to protect the Qur’an. Orientalist scholar William Graham stated that the Qur’an is perhaps the only book, religious or secular, that has been memorised completely by millions of people [92]. Here are just a few examples of what some other non-Muslim textual scholars have to say about the preservation of the Qur’an:Orientalist A.T. Welch writes: For Muslims the Qur’an is much more than scripture or sacred literature in the usual Western sense. Its primary significance for the vast majority through the centuries has been in its oral form, the form in which it first appeared, as the “recitation” chanted by Muhammad to his followers over a period of about twenty years… The revelations were memorized by some of Muhammad’s followers during his lifetime, and the oral tradition that was thus established has had a continuous history ever since, in some ways independent of, and superior to, the written Qur’an… Through the centuries the oral tradition of the entire Qur’an has been maintained by the professional reciters. Until recently, the significance of the recited Qur’an has seldom been fully appreciated in the West. [93] Bible scholar Kenneth Cragg reflects that:This phenomenon of Qur’anic recital means that the text has traversed the centuries in an unbroken living sequence of devotion. It cannot, therefore, be handled as an antiquarian thing, nor as a historical document out of a distant past. The fact of hifdh (Qur’anic memorisation) has made the Qur’an a present possession through all the lapse of Muslim time and given it a human currency in every generation, never allowing its relegation to a bare authority for reference alone. [94] It must be pointed out that almost every Muslim of the estimated 1.5 billion Muslims in the world memorises at least some parts of the Qur’an in Arabic, in order to be able to pray like the Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم .In fact, if every written copy of religious scriptures in existence today were to be somehow destroyed, then it is only the Qur’an that could be recreated perfectly, thanks to its mass memorisation. Those who memorise the Qur'an are people of all ages. The vast majority are not Arabs and don’t even speak Arabic as a language. The oral tradition of the Qur’an is a phenomenon unique to Islam. Is there any reason to doubt the reliability of the oral tradition? The estimated millions throughout the world who have memorised the Qur’an have learnt it via a direct transmission starting from the Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم himself. The implications of this are astonishing. If millions of people who have memorised the Qur’an can trace their oral memorisation of the Qur’an, down the centuries of teachers and scholars, all the way back to the Prophet himself, who could doubt the authenticity of this oral tradition? Especially if these millions of memorisers live in different places in the world, and have learnt the Qur’an from different teachers and scholars. The amount of varying oral transmissions and the amount of people who have learnt the Qur’an, and the fact there are no discrepancies in what they have memorised, is not a historical accident. The conclusion can only be that the Qur’an memorised today is the one that was taught over 1,400 years ago. There is no other rational explanation for this unique oral phenomenon, unless someone argues that all of these memorisers throughout the ages - at different points in time and different places in the world - somehow came together to ensure that they all memorised and recited the exact same Qur’an. To pose such an argument, however, is conspiratorial and absurd. Earlier we saw examples of numerous fabrications that made their way into the New Testament. Such changes to the Qur’an are impossible when we consider the nature of its revelation and transmission. Unlike the New Testament, the verses of the Qur’an were witnessed by multitudes of the Prophet Muhammad's صلى الله عليه وسلم companions at their first point of revelation, so we have mass eyewitness testimony. Moreover, the entire Qur’an was memorised by a large number of companions during the Prophet Muhammad’s صلى الله عليه وسلم lifetime and then rapidly transmitted far and wide. This oral tradition of memorisation facilitated the rapid spread of the Qur’an because anyone can memorise and so, unlike the New Testament, the illiteracy of the masses did not hinder its preservation. It is literally impossible for anyone who transmitted the Qur’an to invent stories, like the stoning of the adulteress that we looked at earlier in the Gospel of John, and for those fabrications to then go on to become part of the accepted Qur’an because they would immediately be caught out by the other memorisers. Additionally, from the beginning, its transmission was on such a large scale by people whose opinions and concerns were so different that it would have been impossible for them to collude in corrupting the Qur’an.

He's preaching in Australia. Australia is familiar with rodent populations absolutely swarming and inundating areas, eating and destroying everywhere and every thing they invade. When the food is gone, they will then attack and eat each other until they are all gone, but a few. This craziness will destroy itself.

The whole world will go into disorder IF Islam allows for a critical text. There will be people probably be threatened and have to flee for their lives if they are really honest about the critical textual variants in the Koran. It will get shutdown or be a perverted process.

The Word of God is the Truth and the only Truth. Praise God and the Lord Jesus Christ!🙏❤️Amen

There are a lot of Christian apologists out there like Dr james. But dont want to be exposed on social media. Rather, they do their apologist in person with muslim and others. God bless you all!