Відео

Anyone here after the fall of the Assad regime?

This is 8 years ago. Pot is boiling.

What expiation? He used difficult terminologies to define it. Why can't he be simple?

If you can’t explain it so a child could understand it, you don’t really understand it. All Marxism grows out of convoluted thought with no basis in reality. It’s meant to make the Marxist feel special and superior; it always collapses when exposed to reality and devolves into rule by smug elitists.

2:47 Ideologie verkörpert sich im Handeln, nicht im Denken, und danach: wie etwas WIRKLICH erscheint, zeigt sich / verkörpert sich im Verhalten, an den Tätigkeiten/Aktivitäten, Reaktionen etc.; wie erscheint Geld wirklich? Ablesbar an den Aktivitäten einzelner Individuen und der Gesamtaktivität des Geldes als emergierte Intelligenz?! Gibt es diesen Unterschied zwischen Erscheinem und wirklichem Erscheinen, zwischen Denken und Ideologie/Handeln, zwischen bewusstem und unbewusstem bei Simmel?

Here Zizek is revealing his power level, very advanced sophistical refutation.

I dont understand why anyone would listen to a word this guy says. He is poison

kissinger was a demon

What did he do with the chicken?

real

Structural mind from afghans through Kurds to Lebanons 1969-1990 he gave them a finger

Here we, today, on Kissinger's final demise.

this is mindfuck no way anybody understood what he said

Promoting Agape is synonymous to kicking a dead horse. Exclusion not inclusion is the core of Love

wow what an incredible speech seriously

censor magical realism

Never trust the J's

Is Zizek a pimp ?

The science of spin: targeted strategies to manufacture doubt with detrimental effects on environmental and public health: #1, Attack Study Design; #2, Gain Support from Reputable Individuals; #3, Misrepresent Data; #4, Suppress Incriminating Information; #5, Contribute Misleading Literature; #6, Host Conferences or Seminars; #7, Avoid/Abuse Peer-Review; #8, Employ Hyperbolic or Absolutist Language; #9, Blame Other Causes; #10, Invoke Liberties/Censorship/Overregulation; #11, Define How to Measure Outcome/Exposure; #12, Take Advantage of Scientific Illiteracy; #13, Pose as a Defender of Health or Truth; #14, Obscure involvement; #15, Develop a PR Strategy; #16, Appeal to Mass Media; #17, Take Advantage of Victim’s Lack of Money/Influence; #18, Normalize Negative Outcomes; #19, Impede Government Regulation; #20, Alter Product to Seem Healthier; #21, Influence Government/Laws; #22, Attack Opponents; #23, Appeal to Emotion; #24, Inappropriately Question Causality; #25, Make Straw Man Arguments; #26, Abuse Credentials; #27, Abuse Data Access Requests; #28, Claim Slippery Slope Source: ehjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12940-021-00723-0

He REALLY over complicates a simple thing here. All marx is saying is that we assign value to an object without knowing who made it ot any of the labor that goes into it. Therefore we assume it "Magical" in that it must therefore have value by itself.

The Syrian godfather saw the future but no-one believe him sadly

can somebody cc this pls :( i cannot make out what he says, or at least summarize tyy

Non Compete is gonna say Zizek is a Nazi now.

Vaush moment. Truly, Zizek is a sage of modern politics.

True

I miss you Daret :(

Like Arendt, the delivery of his thoughts have a hard time keeping up with the flow of his sweet connection of ideas.

This guy is fun... but sadly still a Marxist ... they never learn ...Value is if anything subjective, and its expression part of our individual rights expressed in free association with others. ( for starters see UDHR art 17,7, 20). Most informed people are aware Karl Marx was a racist bigot who, led a crappy self-indulgent life, as an unemployable drunk, a fraudulent “researcher”, a rapist (ask the maid), a never bath "smelly" guy, and leading 19th cent. racist who’s life’s work was dreaming up new ways of updating ancient anti-Semitic prejudice with veiled 19c economic and social class mumbo jumbo, (labour theory of value anyone? ), and a big dose of delusional utopianism as the eschatological desert.

Errr...............I was doing OK until the start of his second sentence

Ideology is what are you doing not what are you thinking

Relevant now more than ever

This is the dumbest shit I have ever heard. The mental gymnastics this guy is performing is astounding.

This is such a male way of looking at love

kokoyu birak

Very Hegelian reflexion here! The error is more often in the question itself (binary, thesis vs antithesis) than in the answer.

Zizek Rear View Mirror: OBJECTS IN THE MIRROR MAY APPEAR MORE OR LESS IDEOLOGICAL THAN THEY REALLY MORE OR LESS APPEAR TO BE

It's a damn shame this documentary doesn't get more attention for how well done it is and how it sheds light on many of the modern problems in the world

He is younger here and so on

mans is high off the blow

It’s easier for me to listen Zizek. I can’t avoid to look at his tics when I’m looking a video of him.

"Why they need this phantasmatic figure of 'The Jew'" is because it was necessary for Houston Chamberlain to racialise evil so as to be able to racialise virtue in the figure of 'The Aryan'" in his racial theory of German history and national character. To be able to protray Germans as inately and naturally morally, spiritually, intellectually and masculinely superior to other nationalities, it was necessary to seperate out universal human evil as an antithetical genetic group. It was necessary for all those who found Houston Chamberlain inspirational to be able to work a confirmation bias towards Germans and the imagined Germanness in history, culture, theology etc, by explaining away all evidence to the contrary, all exceptions, all normal human vices, as Jewish in origin and emanating from 'The Jew' racially just as Chamberlain had flattered them with the notion of their own splendid nobility emanating from Germans racially. You couldn't have the one without the other, because both good and evil have to be explained in the same anthropology and theology, being axiomatically corrrelative aspects of human nature, so having elevated thoughts about one's own nationality and 'race' required hatred of the Jewish other, no matter how fatuous a proposition that is theologically especially, if Jesus was to be raised up as the ultimate virtuous Aryan, despite actually being specifically and exclusively Jewish in his entire thought, speech, worldview and practise.

i fucking love this. this commercial was tone deaf af

A cold or coked up? Anyways, a topic which would do wonders if it ever became part of mainstream narrative. Closest thing is women having shoe fetishes.

What is the documentary BBC called?

i get you point but he is too exited

What's the difference between 'the stupidity' notion of ideology and the real one? They look the same.

Smart dude, but I have a really hard time watching him. I swallow excessively in empathy and rub and sniff my nose like a coke addict trying to scratch that itch for him.

No, Slavoj. The true question is, why do liberals feel the need to defend "German girls" against "Jews" (putting aside the fact that Judaism is a religion, and doesn't preclude them from also being Germans)? The answer is that liberals are the same racist trash as overt Nazis and have the same end goal (blind defence of capitalism), but are using a different method. Now THAT is pathological!

He was talking about national socialism not fascism

Jealousy is not pathological if there is a reason behind that "paranoia". Also paranoia is no longer paranoia if its true.