Відео

😂😂 Right?! Glad that line got a laugh, @PhecdaPlato! Ancient retroactive viruses are the ultimate excuse-just imagine explaining that to HR. Thanks for watching and sharing the love! ❤🧬

Great question, @steveunderhill5935! The idea of thoughts or ideas influencing DNA is super intriguing-it’s almost like stepping into the realm of epigenetics, where environmental factors can affect gene expression. Imagine if ideas could shape us on a molecular level... sci-fi today, science tomorrow? 🤯 Thanks for sharing that mind-bending thought!

HELL'O there! 👋 Thanks for stopping by-hope you enjoyed the video! Let us know your thoughts on those hidden DNA timers. 😄🧬

@@gibsononbooks Our algorithm shouldn't be tampered with at all when we should morph naturally instead of folding space artificially that is stunting our true evolutionary path in an alien invasion so in the full cycle of the Monster that is the Universe in an immune response identifying foreign objects it will reject the efforts of the Wormwood A.I Empire of Old that is being patched up after crashing prior which is what the theme of the legend is about!

@@gibsononbooks Our algorithm shouldn't be tampered with at all when we should morph naturally instead of folding space artificially that is stunting our true evolutionary path in an alien invasion so in the full cycle that is being patched up after crashing prior which is what the theme of the legend is about!

Thanks, @Lettucebird1! Glad you found it interesting! 🧬 The mysteries of DNA are endless-who knows what we might uncover next? Appreciate your support! 😄✨

Right? Nature is full of mind-blowing surprises! It’s amazing how much is hidden in plain sight, waiting to be discovered. Thanks for watching-glad you found it fascinating! 🌿🔬

@douglasdea637 Big Mysterious Object stories are such a treat, and Clarke absolutely nailed it with Rama! Totally hear you about the sequels-it’s tough to match the magic of the original when so much of its charm comes from the mystery. Do you think the explanations in the sequels added to the story, or did they take away some of the intrigue for you?

@@gibsononbooks Overall I liked the explanation. It filled in what Rama and the other objects were but still leaves plenty of mystery. We still know so very little about the history of the galaxy, for example, or what other intelligent life forms are out there. I like the idea of a god-like being that is still constrained by slower-than-light speed travel and needs to physically send probes everywhere. What I didn't like was the 3rd and 4th books and the idea that we would send a community of criminals to represent mankind. Just stupid and bleak, I have a hard time believing Clarke agreed to this.

Thanks for sharing your thoughts, @zeroonetime! Reality Distortion Fields definitely blur the lines between perception and truth-turning illusions into something people wholeheartedly believe. It's fascinating how powerful that 'bend' can be, isn’t it? What’s your take on whether this is more inspiring or dangerous?

@joaniem3817 You're absolutely right-listening to music like Beethoven’s Symphony No. 5 can’t hurt, and it may even help in ways beyond the physical. While there’s no evidence that it can directly treat medical conditions, music has proven benefits for reducing stress, lifting moods, and creating a sense of calm, which can be incredibly valuable for anyone facing challenges. Even if it’s not a cure, the emotional support music provides can be a powerful tool in its own right. Thanks for sharing your thoughts, and I’m glad you see the value in embracing music as part of overall well-being. 🎶✨

@scottritomanaksimonscott6213 Great point! The naming of celestial objects in Rendezvous with Rama adds such an interesting layer of realism to Clarke’s future vision. Using names from a variety of cultures really reflects humanity's global nature and how our collective heritage would play a role in exploring the cosmos. It’s fascinating that Rama, as the 7th reincarnation of Vishnu, also symbolizes cycles and renewal-pretty fitting for such an enigmatic spacecraft, don’t you think?

@adamkashlak8026 Excellent point! Multiple testing is a crucial factor to consider in any scientific study, especially one as speculative as blasting music at cancer cells. Without rigorous statistical controls, even a legitimate study could produce results that seem significant but are actually just random chance. It’s this kind of critical thinking that makes interpreting research so important. A study like this would need to account for confounding variables, replicate findings across multiple trials, and avoid cherry-picking data to make any reliable claims. Your comment highlights why skepticism and proper methodology are vital in separating genuine discoveries from potentially misleading conclusions. Thanks for bringing up such a thoughtful perspective-this is exactly the kind of dialogue that keeps science honest! 🎵🔬

@takashitamagawa5881 That’s a great observation! Clarke definitely prioritized the big ideas and world-building over deep character development, and it’s true that protagonists in his stories often feel secondary to the grand concepts. That said, it’s fascinating how his approach works so well for the genre-letting the science and mysteries take center stage. Do you think that’s a strength of sci-fi, or do you prefer stories with more character-driven narratives?

I so agree.

@ctbrinn1963 Totally get that! Rendezvous with Rama sets such a high bar with its mystery and awe that the sequels had a tough act to follow. Do you think the original is better left as a standalone, or did the sequels add anything worthwhile for you despite missing the mark?

Hi @thedamnedatheist, You make a fair point-the space elevator is an incredibly ambitious concept, and it does come with its share of daunting challenges. The sheer length of the tether, material requirements, and vulnerability to debris are significant hurdles that researchers are still grappling with. Alternatives like the Lofstrom Loop, tethered rings, or orbital rings are indeed compelling and might offer viable solutions to some of these issues. However, each of these concepts comes with its own set of complexities. For instance, orbital rings require advanced propulsion systems for stability, and the Lofstrom Loop depends on near-perfect energy efficiency to operate. These technologies are just as reliant on breakthroughs in materials science and engineering as the space elevator. What makes the space elevator unique, though, is its simplicity once constructed. Unlike dynamic systems, it offers a continuous and potentially more energy-efficient way to access orbit. It might not be the easiest or most immediate solution, but as part of the broader conversation about space infrastructure, it’s worth exploring alongside these alternatives. Curious to hear which alternative you think holds the most promise!

@sarmavlada That’s awesome! Back in the pre-internet days, piecing together a series like Rendezvous with Rama must have been a real adventure in itself. Clarke’s writing is so compelling that you can still enjoy the story even if you’ve missed a book or two. Do you think it’s worth going back to fill in the gaps, or did the parts you read stand strong on their own?

@@gibsononbooks Parts stand good on it's own cause they are different enough probably cause there was co writer and second book I think was from womans point of view. I am considering going back to complete cause it was pretty unique read.

@dusklvr, I’m so sorry to hear about your diagnosis, and I deeply admire your determination and openness to trying anything that brings you comfort or peace during such a challenging time. Listening to music, especially something as powerful and inspiring as Beethoven’s Symphony No. 5, can be a wonderful way to nurture your emotional and mental well-being. Music has an incredible ability to calm the mind, reduce stress, and uplift the spirit-things that can be so important when navigating a journey like yours. While there’s no scientific evidence that music alone can treat cancer, combining practices that bring you peace with the medical treatments you’re undergoing can be empowering. Your mindset and emotional strength are such vital parts of your overall care. I wish you strength and healing on your journey, and I hope the music brings you moments of solace and resilience. Sending you positive thoughts. 💛🎵

Kindly look up fenbendazole and ivermectin! I heard that they treat like 75% of cancer cases

Kindly look up fenbendazole and ivermectin , been known to cure cancer !!! Manuka honey and turkey tail mushroom are also great immunity Boosters . Kindly cut off any unnatural sugar intake , only drink goat milk and cut off red meats and only cook with olive oil or coconut oil ( try not to burn the olive oil ) .Eat quail eggs and propolis , pollen and royal jelly ! Trust me , these work like Miracle !

Thank you so much for your thoughtful comment and kind words, @MilciadesAndrion! 🙏 You’re absolutely right-while miracles inspire hope and curiosity, science thrives on evidence and repeatable results. Without robust studies to support extraordinary claims, it’s essential to approach them with healthy skepticism, as you’ve pointed out. I’m glad you found the explanations logical-that’s always the goal! It’s fascinating to think about the interplay between hope, science, and the human tendency to search for answers, especially when dealing with something as profound as cancer. Thanks again for engaging with the video, and I truly appreciate your support as a subscriber! Let’s keep the conversation going. 🌟🎵

@@ct20ar Totally agree! Rendezvous with Rama is an absolute masterpiece. What stood out to you the most-the mysterious nature of Rama, Clarke’s scientific detail, or something else? Would love to hear your thoughts!

Thank you for your thoughtful comment, @KerriBFreese. You bring up an interesting point about sound frequencies and their potential effects. It’s absolutely true that sound waves can have measurable physical impacts-breaking glass with specific frequencies is a well-known phenomenon. However, when it comes to targeting something as complex and dynamic as cancer cells, the science becomes far more intricate. The idea of using sound frequencies for therapeutic purposes is being explored in legitimate scientific research. For example, focused ultrasound technology is already used in medicine, such as breaking up kidney stones or treating certain types of tumors. These applications involve highly precise, high-intensity sound waves directed at a specific target, backed by years of research and clinical trials. However, music, including Beethoven's Symphony No. 5, operates at a much lower frequency and lacks the precision required to selectively impact cancer cells. The notion that a piece of music could target specific cells is not supported by current scientific understanding of how sound interacts with biological tissues. That said, music therapy has proven benefits for mental health, stress reduction, and overall well-being, which can be invaluable during cancer treatment. Combining such therapies with evidence-based medical treatments, like chemotherapy, can enhance a patient's quality of life and emotional resilience. Your open-mindedness is admirable, and exploring the possibilities of sound as a complementary therapy is a fascinating topic. The key, however, is ensuring these ideas are grounded in rigorous scientific evidence to truly benefit patients. Misinformation can sometimes overshadow promising research, which is why maintaining a healthy skepticism and seeking credible sources is so important. Thank you again for engaging in this discussion! 🌟

@@ArcanePath360 are you on Android or iOS. I haven't used it for a while, but I might me able to advise depending on what device your are using.

@@gibsononbooks It's okay I connected via USB. Keeps disconnecting randomly though but I think that's either my cable or the voltage on the port

Hi @beebop9808, That’s an interesting perspective! The story of Babel is certainly a cautionary tale about human ambition and hubris. It reflects the idea that unity of purpose, while powerful, can also lead to overreach if not tempered with wisdom. However, unlike the Tower of Babel, which aimed to challenge divine boundaries, the space elevator is rooted in the collaborative spirit of science and exploration. It’s a testament to humanity’s collective drive to overcome challenges for the benefit of all-bridging gaps, rather than creating division. Perhaps, instead of scattering, this modern “tower” could bring people together-uniting nations and fostering innovation in the pursuit of a shared goal: reaching the stars. What are your thoughts?

Never happen. This civilization isn't going to last long enough to get that far. I'm not calling for the end of the planet but the end of this world as we know it is coming and sooner than people expect or willing to accept. It has happened many times over and foolish to think it's not coming again.

@antgiat Exactly! All we need is an indestructible rope that doesn’t snap under 35,786 kilometers of weight. No big deal, right? Just tell Spider-Man to get weaving!

Good point-polluted water is indeed a critical issue and poses serious health risks. Contaminants like industrial runoff or waste can lead to widespread health crises. Addressing this requires collective action to ensure safe, clean water for all. Thanks for highlighting this!

@bosunhiggs9708 You’re not wrong-lightning would definitely be an issue! Engineers have proposed solutions like grounding systems and advanced materials to protect against strikes. Imagine if Ben Franklin could see this-he’d probably be asking for a ride up the tether, kite and key in hand!

@JetJockey87 Haha, I assure you, I’m 100% human… or at least that’s what the AI overlords programmed me to say. Glad you’re enjoying the content either way!

@@doremifasola9416 You're absolutely right that extremely high LDL levels, such as over 600, pose a significant health risk, even when triglycerides and HDL are normal. Such levels are often associated with genetic conditions like familial hypercholesterolemia, which require specialized medical attention. However, it's also important to consider that factors like sugar consumption can contribute indirectly to lipid imbalances, including small, dense LDL particles, which are more harmful than the larger, buoyant ones. Modern research increasingly points to sugar's role in systemic inflammation and metabolic disruptions, which can exacerbate cardiovascular risks. Thank you for bringing up this important nuance.

Hi @ConstantinChirpac! Could you clarify what you mean by your comment? Are you referring to Tsiolkovsky's contributions to the space elevator concept, or are you asking about international collaboration on projects like this? I'd love to understand your perspective better!

@wuseling Well, the space elevator might sound like BS now, but isn’t that what people said about airplanes, Wi-Fi, and pineapple on pizza? Sometimes the most out-there ideas end up changing the world... though we’re still debating the pizza thing!

@gibsononbooks ... I prefer to believe in "antigravity" or "energy out of nothing" then - that may come true earlier

@rong1924 Ah yes, the EPCOT space elevator-a fine example of Disney Imagineering solving Earth's engineering problems! If only real space elevators came with a nice dinner and a view of the Magic Kingdom. NASA, take notes!

Hi @ravinrabbit7932, thanks for your comment. It's worth noting that The Man in the High Castle doesn’t imply that the world it portrays 'could be worse.' Instead, it presents a stark and unsettling vision of life under totalitarian control. The novel invites us to reflect on the consequences of unchecked power and the values that shape societies. What aspects of the book stood out to you?

@rezadaneshi That’s a chilling yet thought-provoking take! The connection between dreams, reality, and time has always been a fascinating concept, and the idea of "dying in a dream" impacting real life taps into some deeply existential themes. While it makes for an intriguing storyline in movies like *The Matrix*, science leans towards dreams being a construct of the mind, detached from physical consequences. Still, it raises a powerful question: how much of our reality is shaped by perception, and how does time play into that? Thanks for sharing such an intriguing angle-it definitely adds a layer of depth to the conversation! 😊

@shaunconyers Absolutely agree! With today’s CGI and storytelling techniques, The Gods Themselves could be turned into an incredible movie. The unique alien perspectives and the epic moral dilemmas would make for such a visually stunning and thought-provoking film. Let’s hope Hollywood is paying attention! 🚀🎥✨

@@rezadaneshi Great question! The challenges you mentioned, like Earth's precession, spin speed changes, and dynamic forces acting on a 35,786 km tether, are some of the biggest hurdles for a space elevator. Engineers envision counterweights beyond geostationary orbit to stabilize the tether and manage precession. Advanced materials like carbon nanotubes or graphene, with their immense tensile strength, could help withstand these forces without 'wagging' or snapping. Active control systems might also dampen oscillations and account for Earth's variations over time. Rockets would still play a role initially-perhaps for assembling components in orbit-but the ultimate goal is to reduce reliance on them for regular access to space. It's an exciting mix of science, engineering, and imagination!

Great answer if you add wishful thinking after imagination. I have a bit of both by suggesting genetic modification of Hyperion to grow that tall with levity as in sense of humor!)

@captaintvb You make an excellent point-evolutionary arguments often prioritize survival and reproduction, not longevity or health into our 40s, 50s, and beyond. Evolution doesn’t particularly 'care' about what happens after we’ve passed on our genes, which is why some diseases that manifest later in life might not have been weeded out by natural selection. This is a critical limitation when using evolutionary principles to guide modern health practices. 🧬 That said, the principles of whole, minimally processed foods and fasting seem to have benefits that extend well beyond reproductive years, as you’ve personally experienced. It’s less about trying to live like our ancestors and more about recognizing which aspects of their diets might support long-term health today-while filtering them through the lens of modern science. The fact that you’re already feeling great in your 30s by incorporating these practices is a strong indicator you’re on the right track for now. Of course, as you pointed out, the test of time will be whether these habits hold up as we age. Who knows-maybe future research will help us fine-tune these principles even more for health in our later decades. Thanks for sharing such a balanced and thoughtful perspective! 😊

@dirkguijt2810 Hate is a strong word-I prefer to think of it as a mutual understanding. Kale smoothies know I’ll never betray eggs and butter, and I know they’ll never taste like anything other than lawn clippings blended with regret. It’s an arrangement that works for both of us. 😏🥬

@Frogman125 Carbs absolutely exist in nature, and they’ve been a part of human diets for millennia-even before the agricultural revolution. Wild fruits, tubers, nuts, seeds, and even honey are all naturally occurring sources of carbohydrates that early humans consumed. While modern agriculture has certainly modified the size, sweetness, and availability of many fruits and vegetables, their ancestral counterparts were still a source of carbs in pre-agricultural times. For example, wild tubers and roots were starchy staples in many environments. Your point about humans being apex predators due to our ability to use tools and cooperative tactics is spot on. However, being an apex predator doesn’t inherently mean exclusively carnivorous. It means we were highly adaptable, capable of thriving on a diverse diet tailored to the resources available. Our digestive systems reflect this omnivorous flexibility-while we don’t have the digestive tracts of obligate carnivores like lions, we also don’t resemble strict herbivores like cows. Instead, we’ve evolved to efficiently process both plant and animal foods. Carbs have likely played a key role in human evolution, particularly in fueling our large, energy-demanding brains. The ability to access a variety of food sources-animal protein, fats, and yes, carbohydrates-was one of our species' greatest strengths. Thanks for sparking such an important discussion! 😊

@@gibsononbooks I look at available carbohydrate in Europe and Asia during the Ice Age, a period where great leaps were made in evolution. Sure, berries and honey were present, but seasonal and difficult to consume regularly. Tubers, in the primitive form, had to be cooked for hours, were incredibly fiberous. Our digestion of these tubers actually produced fatty acids, rather than glucose for fuel. Looking at our digestive system: we have the highest PH level of any animal, to include classic carnivores like big cats. Our appendix, is about 2 inches long, formally it was a secum. The great apes and gorillas have secums, they are 4 feet long. The secum holds the plant material while embedded bacteria digest the fiber, releasing fatty acids for fuel, protein comes from bacteria dying off. We do not and cannot digest fiber in this manner, it is wasted material. I look at thrive vs. survive.

@JemyM Thanks for taking the time to craft such a detailed and thought-provoking comment. You raise some valid points about the pitfalls of oversimplified narratives around nutrition. I particularly appreciate the analogy of health being like learning to drive-it’s a process that requires active engagement, learning, and practice. Your emphasis on understanding the complexities of metabolism, macronutrients, and personalized nutrition is spot on. 🧠🍎 That said, I’d push back a little on your dismissal of terms like 'whole unprocessed foods.' While they may lack the precision of a textbook definition, they serve as accessible shorthand to encourage people to prioritize nutrient-dense options over ultra-processed, calorie-dense foods. For many, this concept can be a helpful starting point-especially in a world where the majority of available foods are engineered for taste and convenience at the expense of nutrition. Simplifications, when used as a stepping stone, can be part of a healthy approach rather than a destination in themselves. As for cholesterol, the evolving science has revealed a much more nuanced story than the traditional 'cholesterol is bad' narrative. It’s not about glorifying eggs without brakes; it’s about acknowledging that dietary cholesterol isn’t as universally harmful as once thought and that foods like eggs can have a valuable place in many diets when consumed mindfully. Yes, overconsumption of anything, whether it’s Big Macs or broccoli, can have consequences-context matters. Your point about Orthorexia Nervosa is critical and highlights the dangers of demonizing specific foods or ingredients. Balance, informed choices, and flexibility are key to a healthy mindset. However, I’d argue that the existence of harmful extremes (like orthorexia) doesn’t invalidate the utility of simplified guidelines for the majority. Not everyone has the time, interest, or resources to dissect every label down to its TDEE impact. For many, riding the 'nutrition bus' can be a step toward better health, even if the end goal is driving their own. I agree wholeheartedly with your closing sentiment: taking personal responsibility and truly understanding how nutrition works is empowering. But let’s not discount the value of basic, actionable advice for those just starting their health journey. It’s all about meeting people where they are and helping them move forward in a sustainable way. Thanks again for sharing such an engaging perspective-it’s comments like yours that elevate the conversation! 😊

​@@gibsononbooks Thank you for your reply, and I am sorry for going a bit hard. I escaped a life long obesity recently, dropping 120 pounds between February 2023 to September 2024. I used a mix of alternate day fasting, walking and swimming, while changing the way I eat entirely. For one thing I actually have 4-6 eggs on average per day. Over that and my cholesterol go up. But I am also a societal psychologist so the way society and individual psychology interact is a nerdy subject of mine. :) There is a longer story why I think the 'whole unprocessed foods' have problems as a simplified compass, and my emphasis on making sure you know why a food is an issue and when it is not. The first, like I mentioned, is that simplifications tend to move around the issue. We could agree that for example a Big Mac or snickers bar is a Processed Food, designed to be palatable and easy to overconsume. But so is Apple Cider Vinegar, Psyllium Husk and fat-free Turkish Yoghurt. Tastes that make the healthier option more palatable tend to be chemistry as well, whether its artificial flavors or alternative sweeteners that motivate you to stick with a healthier option than you might otherwise. Processed Foods are processed for a reason, they are made to support a larger population, which requires shelf-life, preservatives to avoid rot or bacteria, accessibility etc. They are the kinds of foods that are most commonly accessible to the average person who lack the privilege of having better choices. There is a matter of class here. Not everyone is able to stay at home and cook great food because they do not have the time, or money, or skill, or energy to do so. Cheap super-market food options is what they have to rely on for themselves and hungry families. So for a vast majority of the modern population, it's a game over before they even started if they have to avoid "processed foods". Much like the old "teach a man to fish" - learning how to read a nutrition label is to learn how to handle the urban jungle that a modern person usually have to learn how to navigate, because their menu is going to have to rely on processed items to a degree because that *is* the world we are living in now. While our ancestors might be hunter-gatherers who could kill the local wildlife and eventually dig up and grew crops, our world today rely on the economy of industrialized nations and thus industrialized food. Even "raw" food here is mass-produced. Another factor is that restriction, any kind of restriction of entire food groups, drive another eating disorder, Binge Eating Disorder. Trying to give up the tasty foods actually cause problems with binging. For them its vital to be working on permissive moderation rather than restriction. While demonized, a Big Mac is actually just about 500 calories and it's not going to kill you. An average adult can have three of those in a day if they skip fries, have a diet soda and only have a light meal later or earlier in the day. While not ideal, knowing that its still something you can have and do fine, is for a binge eater better than trying to abstain, because total abstinence is very likely going to lead to a binge of several times that amount of calories. With those things in mind... Is the suggestion to simply ditch processed foods a basic, actionable advice for a normal person, meeting them where they are in life? Or is it a suggestion that doesn't actually take large segments of the population into account and may actually make things worse?

@JemyM Thank you for sharing your journey and for expanding on your perspective-it’s clear you’ve put a lot of thought into this, both from personal experience and as a societal psychologist. First off, congratulations on your incredible transformation! Dropping 120 pounds through a balanced mix of fasting, exercise, and dietary changes is no small feat, and it’s inspiring to see how deliberate and informed your approach has been. 🌟 You raise an excellent point about the complexities of "processed foods" and how oversimplifications can overlook the broader societal context. I completely agree that not all processed foods are created equal, and grouping something like a Snickers bar with psyllium husk or fat-free yogurt can unintentionally muddle the conversation. Your example highlights how nuanced this discussion needs to be. Processed foods often exist for practical reasons-shelf stability, affordability, and accessibility-and these factors are crucial for people who lack the time, resources, or ability to prepare meals from scratch. Your observation about the relationship between restriction and binge eating is particularly insightful. Demonizing certain foods outright can indeed lead to unhealthy cycles of guilt and overindulgence, especially for individuals prone to binge eating disorder. Allowing space for moderation, rather than blanket restriction, often helps people develop a healthier relationship with food. In this context, understanding what makes a food "fit" into one’s lifestyle is more empowering than rigidly adhering to any dietary dogma. As for whether "ditch processed foods" is actionable advice for most people-it’s an interesting challenge. On one hand, encouraging more whole, nutrient-dense choices is a helpful starting point for many. On the other hand, as you’ve pointed out, this advice often fails to account for the realities of modern life, including socioeconomic factors and the global reliance on industrialized food systems. Teaching people how to navigate this system, whether through reading nutrition labels or practicing moderation, might indeed be more practical and inclusive. In the end, I think the key is balance-offering broad guidance without ignoring the importance of personal circumstances. For some, simplifying to 'avoid processed foods' may be empowering, while for others, it may feel like an impossible standard. Your thoughtful insights remind us all to approach nutrition with empathy, context, and an open mind. Thanks again for such a meaningful contribution to the conversation! 😊

@p.jonaitis7952 Animal foods are undeniably nutrient-dense and offer a range of essential vitamins and minerals, but relying exclusively on them may overlook the benefits of variety from plant-based sources. Nutritional diversity isn’t just about covering macronutrient needs-it’s also about accessing a wide range of antioxidants, fiber, and phytonutrients found in plants, which contribute to gut health, immune function, and long-term disease prevention. That said, I agree that animal foods can provide a solid foundation for nutrition, especially when sourced well and eaten in balance. For some people, a focus on animal-based foods works incredibly well for their health and lifestyle, but others find that including fruits, vegetables, nuts, and seeds enhances their overall well-being. Variety isn’t about dogma-it’s about finding what works for your body and your goals. Thanks for sharing your perspective! 😊

@jarichards99utube Haha, glad you enjoyed that one! Sometimes a little humor is the best way to cut through all the hype-kale smoothies or otherwise. 😄 Thanks for the laugh and the thumbs-up, 70SomethingGuy-your energy is inspiring! Keep the good vibes coming. 👍✨

@craigsomersett4203 Ah yes, the classic 'evolutionary propaganda' card-because clearly, the only way to understand how our bodies process food is to ignore thousands of years of adaptation and science. 🙃 By your logic, should we also dismiss gravity as 'Newtonian propaganda'? Or maybe antibiotics are just 'bacterial propaganda'? If you’ve got a more trustworthy starting point than the biological mechanisms that literally keep us alive, I’m all ears. Until then, feel free to sit back, relax, and let the rest of us explore solutions grounded in evidence. 🤷‍♂️

@parasences Thanks for sharing your experience-it sounds like you've put a lot of thought and effort into finding what works best for your body, and that’s impressive. Cutting out sugar, grains, and seed oils is a significant lifestyle shift, and it’s fascinating to hear how that change helped you step away from alcohol, weed, and cigarettes as well. That’s a powerful testimony to the link between diet and overall well-being. 🌱🥩 Your method of systematically testing foods after two months of strict carnivore shows real discipline and self-awareness. It’s also a great reminder that there’s no one-size-fits-all diet; tailoring food choices to individual needs and tolerances can lead to profound benefits. That said, I’d be curious about your thoughts on diversity in the long term. While it seems to be working well for you now, some research suggests that including a broader range of nutrient-dense foods-when tolerated-can be beneficial for gut microbiota and overall nutrient intake. Do you think you might experiment with other foods in the future, or are you confident you’ve found your forever plan? Either way, it sounds like you’re thriving on your current approach, and that’s what matters most! 😊

@gibsononbooks Every two weeks, i either eat a meal from my 92yo grandma, usually with potatoes and seasonal vegetables with some meat, or i have a meal with basmati-rice and seasonal vegetables on my own. I never had any problems with potatoes and rice, but i prefer to burn fat as fuel, hence only eat one big carb-heavy meal every two weeks. Cant hurt to not unlearn digesting them, in case of a war starting, or poverty, or hospitalisation.

@parasences That's a thoughtful and practical approach-maintaining metabolic flexibility by occasionally including carb-heavy meals makes a lot of sense. It's impressive that you’ve found a balance that works for you while staying aligned with your preference for fat as fuel. Eating a meal from your 92-year-old grandma sounds like a wonderful tradition-it’s not just about the food but the connection and memories tied to those meals. Plus, incorporating seasonal vegetables and wholesome ingredients like basmati rice and potatoes adds variety without derailing your overall dietary goals. 🌱🥔🍚 Your point about staying adaptable for potential scenarios like war, poverty, or hospitalization is particularly insightful. It’s easy to get locked into one dietary pattern, but life can throw curveballs, and being able to handle different foods is a valuable skill. It sounds like you’ve thought this through from both a health and practical perspective-well done! 😊

@herbbowler2461, you’ve certainly made a passionate case here-it's clear you feel strongly about veganism! 🌱 But let's unpack a few things gently, shall we? First off, I don’t think anyone’s 'pointing fingers' at vegans here; the discussion is about diet diversity, not dietary superiority contests. 🥗 vs. 🍖 doesn’t have to be a gladiator match. And sure, Steve Jobs was a vegan, but citing one example-either for or against-is a shaky foundation for dietary science. You mentioned humans having the digestive system of herbivores. While we may not have claws or fangs for hunting, we do have versatile digestive systems designed for both plant and animal foods-kind of the whole omnivore thing. It's an evolutionary hallmark! As for arm wrestling a vegan... well, that’s a unique measure of dietary success! 💪 But strength, longevity, and health come down to so much more than diet alone-genetics, environment, lifestyle, and access to healthcare all play huge roles. No blinders here-just exploring different perspectives. Appreciate your passion, though. Keep thriving since 1979! 😊

@gibsononbooks You did point the finger at vegans 4 times in the vidio. Compare vegan with carnivore. Anywhere on Earth. It's always the same. Vegans or plant based have the longest healthiest lives and carnivore the shortest and sickiest lives with omnivores somewhere in between! Yes you do have blinders. You just won't admit it . And no we don't have a digestive system like a meat eater. Or even an omnivore. An omnivore animal has 10 times stronger hydrochloric acid, a carnivore, up 100 times stronger and scavenger up 1000 times stronger than humans. And the only animals with a longer gut are grass grazers . Our gut is 4 to 5 times longer than a carnivore compared to body length to accommodate a high fiber diet. There are very long lived healthy people that eat meat occasionally or those that never eat meat. But none on a high meat diet!

@gibsononbooks Also about healthcare ???? My 1st rule to good health is stay away from the doctor!

"@herbbowler2461 Thank you for sharing your perspective with such detail and passion. Let’s unpack a few points together in the spirit of respectful dialogue. Firstly, regarding the 'blinders,' it’s worth noting that there are multiple lenses through which to view dietary health. For example, some individuals thrive on the **carnivore diet**, which, despite its critics, has **scientifically supported benefits** for specific conditions like improved blood sugar control, autoimmune symptom relief, and gut health in certain populations. Just as some find optimal health on a vegan diet, others have found similar success on the opposite end of the spectrum. Would you consider it possible that blinders could exist in both directions? 🌱🍖 Your point about digestive systems is fascinating but might oversimplify things. While it’s true that humans lack the acidic stomachs of carnivores or scavengers, our evolutionary adaptability as omnivores has allowed us to digest and thrive on both plants and animal-based foods. For instance, we can absorb highly bioavailable nutrients like heme iron and B12 from meat, which are harder to obtain from plant sources without supplementation. This versatility is a cornerstone of our survival and dietary evolution. As for your statement about long-lived populations, it’s important to consider the broader context. The 'Blue Zones' you mentioned are often cited, but their diets are as much about **diversity, moderation, and lifestyle factors** (like community and physical activity) as they are about avoiding or including specific food groups. And while we don’t yet have long-term studies on extreme high-meat diets, there are numerous anecdotes and emerging research showing benefits for certain individuals, especially those with autoimmune or metabolic disorders. Finally, comparisons like 'vegans vs. carnivores' can often oversimplify complex topics. Instead of assuming one diet is inherently superior, perhaps we can agree that what works best varies based on genetics, lifestyle, and health needs. At the end of the day, we all aim for the same goal: long, healthy lives. Thanks again for keeping the conversation lively-discussions like these help us all learn! 😊

@herbbowler2461 I can see where you’re coming from, and I agree that taking proactive steps to maintain good health and prevent illness is absolutely the best strategy. Eating well, staying active, and managing stress are crucial pillars of good health. 🌱💪 That said, I’ve recently had a personal experience with gout, and I can tell you firsthand that sometimes, medical intervention is not just helpful but essential. Gout can be excruciating, and while dietary changes play a huge role in managing it, the immediate relief I got from medication was life-changing. It reminded me that healthcare isn’t just about treating emergencies-it’s also about partnering with professionals when needed to live a fuller, healthier life. I think the key is balance. Relying solely on doctors without taking personal responsibility for health can lead to poor outcomes, but completely avoiding them might mean missing out on vital care when it’s really necessary. What do you think about finding that middle ground-where we take charge of our health but still recognize the value of professional healthcare when things go sideways? 😊