- 39
- 154 241
AIEMCA
Приєднався 26 сер 2009
The Australian Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis was formed on 3rd September 2001 as a joint initiative of the Australian delegates at the July 2001 meetings of the International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis in Manchester (UK).
Its purpose is to bring together researchers in the fields of EM and CA across Australia, to share news and events and to organise meetings, symposia and conferences.
This Channel is run by Edward Reynolds. For more information and details on how to make inquries see www.uq.academia.edu/EdwardReynolds and also aiemca.net
Its purpose is to bring together researchers in the fields of EM and CA across Australia, to share news and events and to organise meetings, symposia and conferences.
This Channel is run by Edward Reynolds. For more information and details on how to make inquries see www.uq.academia.edu/EdwardReynolds and also aiemca.net
Alan Blum at IIEMCA "The Jouissance of Ethnomethodology: Imaginary, Desire, Drive"
The relation of technology to reflectivity stated as conference theme makes
reference to an opposition worth reviving in order to address the relationship of
thought to techne and to question this partitioning, the different ways thought can
and does treat techne as topic and resource. Eventually I want to resuscitate the
idea of the human as a tool-making animal in a strong rather than limited sense.
This leads to reengaging thinking and so language too, as strategic in Kenneth
Burke's sense of equipment for living, rather than as phobic. In the spirit of my work
with colleagues such as Peter McHugh, Stanley Raffel, Kieran Bonner and many
others alive and dead, I consider this relationship as part of a discourse to be
worked-through, as traces of an archive (available from Plato, Hegel, Simmel,
Arendt to name examples) in which Garfinkel's work intervened in the spirit of the
intellectual climate of the 1960's. This tension functions as an ethical collision, akin
to what Sacks called a work site, for exploring imagination itself as two-sided, both
emancipatory and juridical, capable of devolving into hysteric and obsessive
adaptations. Such a tension has been a recurrent feature of the discourse of
ethnomethodology. Taking advantage of my participation as a witness to this
history in part, I use the structure of affiliations and influences to revisit the
fundamental ambiguity of the project and its imaginary self understanding. This is
designed as a case study for applying the conference theme that invites us to
question the relation of reflexivity to technology. Instead of inventorying successes
and failures of this project I want to show its place as part of a modern critical
approach to social life and as a necessary step in the narrative of 'reflective
modernity'.
reference to an opposition worth reviving in order to address the relationship of
thought to techne and to question this partitioning, the different ways thought can
and does treat techne as topic and resource. Eventually I want to resuscitate the
idea of the human as a tool-making animal in a strong rather than limited sense.
This leads to reengaging thinking and so language too, as strategic in Kenneth
Burke's sense of equipment for living, rather than as phobic. In the spirit of my work
with colleagues such as Peter McHugh, Stanley Raffel, Kieran Bonner and many
others alive and dead, I consider this relationship as part of a discourse to be
worked-through, as traces of an archive (available from Plato, Hegel, Simmel,
Arendt to name examples) in which Garfinkel's work intervened in the spirit of the
intellectual climate of the 1960's. This tension functions as an ethical collision, akin
to what Sacks called a work site, for exploring imagination itself as two-sided, both
emancipatory and juridical, capable of devolving into hysteric and obsessive
adaptations. Such a tension has been a recurrent feature of the discourse of
ethnomethodology. Taking advantage of my participation as a witness to this
history in part, I use the structure of affiliations and influences to revisit the
fundamental ambiguity of the project and its imaginary self understanding. This is
designed as a case study for applying the conference theme that invites us to
question the relation of reflexivity to technology. Instead of inventorying successes
and failures of this project I want to show its place as part of a modern critical
approach to social life and as a necessary step in the narrative of 'reflective
modernity'.
Переглядів: 685
Відео
Kenneth Liberman on challenging the Doxa and unsettling analytic slogans
Переглядів 97510 років тому
Kenneth liberman from the University of Oregon and University of Trento talking about ethnomethodology and not getting too relaxed with your analysis.
Aphasia and Conversational repair: AIEMCA 2012
Переглядів 54511 років тому
Dr Scott Barnes from Macquarie University talking about repair in conversation with suffers of aphasia
Ethnomethodology: explaining two Paragraphs by Harold Garfinkel.mov
Переглядів 23 тис.12 років тому
Ethnomethodology: explaining two Paragraphs by Harold Garfinkel.mov
Ethnomethodology: Yahoo Research - Bob Moore
Переглядів 1,9 тис.12 років тому
Bob Moore P.h.D. from Yahoo Research talking about his experience using ethnomethodology in the corporate world. research.yahoo.com/Bob_Moore
Ethnomethodology and CA: Doug Maynard on Ethnomethodological Alternates
Переглядів 1,8 тис.12 років тому
Doug Maynard from the University of Wisconsin, Madison, talking at ASA (in caesar's palace no less) about Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis's relationship to other disciplines via the notion of 'ethnomethodological alternates'. more details at Douglas W. Maynard & Nora Cate Schaeffer, 2000. Toward a Sociology of Social Scientific Knowledge: Survey Research and Ethnomethodology's Asymme...
Anne Rawls on Harold Garfinkel and ethnomethodology
Переглядів 9 тис.12 років тому
Anne Rawls Associate Professory of Sociology from Bentley University faculty.bentley.edu/details.asp?uname=arawls talking about the founder of ethnomethodology Harold Garfinkel
Jeff Coulter on the Mind, language and society
Переглядів 3,1 тис.12 років тому
Professor Jeff Coulter from Boston University (www.bu.edu/sociology/faculty-staff/faculty/jeff-coulter/) in an interview at ASA 2011 talking about the way in which Ethnomethodology respecifies the 'mind' and 'mental' phenomena.
Membership Categorisation Analysis: Peter Eglin
Переглядів 3,7 тис.13 років тому
Professor Peter Eglin from Wilfred Laureate University Ontario talking about the basic ideas of membership categorization analysis.
Conversation Analysis: Respecifying Milgram's obedience studies : Matthew Hollander
Переглядів 1,1 тис.13 років тому
Matthew Hollander from the University of Wisconsin talking about his dissertation project analysing the production of 'Obedience' in the original Milgram experiments.
Ethnomethodology: Mike Lynch on Ethnomethodological studies of work in the sciences
Переглядів 4 тис.13 років тому
Professor Mike Lynch from Cornell University talking about Ethnomethodological studies of science.
George Psathas on Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis
Переглядів 8 тис.13 років тому
An interview with Emeritus Professor George Psathas from the University of Boston talking about the relationship between Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis From his webpage "George Psathas (B.A. '50 and Ph.D. '56 Yale University; M.A. '51 University of Michigan) is Emeritus Professor of Sociology at Boston University (since 1997) and Professor (since 1968) and has served as Chairman and...
Conversation Analysis and English as a Lingua Franca
Переглядів 2 тис.13 років тому
Natalia Duruss from the DICA Lab at the University of Luxembourg talking about research using Conversation Analysis to investigate how English is used in multilingual classrooms
Conversation Analysis and Journalism Research: Mats Ekstrom
Переглядів 52213 років тому
Professor Mats Ekstrom from the University of Oerbro in Sweden in an Interview at IPRA talking about the use of Conversation Analysis to research Journalism.
Conversation Analysis and Interactional Linguistics: Traci Walker
Переглядів 6 тис.13 років тому
Traci Walker from the University of York talking at IPRA about the relationship between Interactional Linguistics/Linguistics and Conversation Analysis
UQLIC Flashmob raw footage - participants eye view
Переглядів 17913 років тому
UQLIC Flashmob raw footage - participants eye view
AIEMCA: Conversation Analysis: Alan Firth on mediation and making use of CA
Переглядів 1,8 тис.13 років тому
AIEMCA: Conversation Analysis: Alan Firth on mediation and making use of CA
Conversation Analysis: doing a CA PHD on medical interaction
Переглядів 1,3 тис.13 років тому
Conversation Analysis: doing a CA PHD on medical interaction
Conversation Analysis and Speech Pathology: Applied conversation analysis in therapy settings
Переглядів 1,6 тис.13 років тому
Conversation Analysis and Speech Pathology: Applied conversation analysis in therapy settings
Membership Categorisation Analysis: Interview with Richard Fitzgerald Part 1
Переглядів 2,5 тис.13 років тому
Membership Categorisation Analysis: Interview with Richard Fitzgerald Part 1
Conversation analysis in child protection interviews: Kathy Fogarty
Переглядів 1,8 тис.13 років тому
Conversation analysis in child protection interviews: Kathy Fogarty
Conversation Analysis - ICCA Diaries 5: Geoff Raymond
Переглядів 1,5 тис.14 років тому
Conversation Analysis - ICCA Diaries 5: Geoff Raymond
Conversation Analysis: Doing a thesis - research questions and lit reviews
Переглядів 4,3 тис.14 років тому
Conversation Analysis: Doing a thesis - research questions and lit reviews
Discursive Psychology Loughborough Diaries 4 Derek Edward continued
Переглядів 2,1 тис.14 років тому
Discursive Psychology Loughborough Diaries 4 Derek Edward continued
Discursive Psychology: Loughborough diaries 3 Derek Edwards
Переглядів 9 тис.14 років тому
Discursive Psychology: Loughborough diaries 3 Derek Edwards
Conversation Analysis: ICCA Diaries 3 Joyce Lamerichs
Переглядів 1,1 тис.14 років тому
Conversation Analysis: ICCA Diaries 3 Joyce Lamerichs
Conversation Analysis Loughborough Diaries 1
Переглядів 7 тис.14 років тому
Conversation Analysis Loughborough Diaries 1
Loughborough Diaries 2: Jonathan Potter
Переглядів 9 тис.14 років тому
Loughborough Diaries 2: Jonathan Potter
ICCA Diaries 1 - Danielle Pillet-Shore
Переглядів 1,1 тис.14 років тому
ICCA Diaries 1 - Danielle Pillet-Shore
ICCA Diaries 2 Rosina Marquez at ICCA 2010 talking about data driving method
Переглядів 20814 років тому
ICCA Diaries 2 Rosina Marquez at ICCA 2010 talking about data driving method
Happy to attend this during my time in 5th Semester of Law degree. Trying to cope with the cultural assimilation while migrating to a new campus for completing my degree...LOL Just droping this personal note for my future self 🎉 Thank you professor! ❤ Loc: BU- ISB-2024
01:28 Primer párrafo
I found this site while looking something up. Thank you for this interview with George Psathas. It's a pure oy hearing his voice, his wisdom, and his knowledge of our history. I was a student of his in the 1980s. He was most encouraging to all of us and our research. Thank you again.
Studying your work in my psychology class. So fascinating!
Very insightful. I enjoyed that
He's so clear, this is so helpful
So valuable! Can you provide an example of analysing discourse in relation to interactional sociolinguistics?
You're boring Get to the interesting part of Garfinkle’s Ethnomethodology ... BREACHING EXPERIMENTS How are you? Oh my goodness the Opioid Induced Constipation (OIC) is making my hemorrhoids flare.
Garfinkel 1988 'For ethnomethodology the objective reality of social facts, in that and just how it is every society's locally, endogenously produced, naturally organized, reflexively accountable, ongoing, practical achievement, being everywhere, always, only, exactly and entirely, members' work, with no time out, and with no possibility of evasion, hiding out, passing, postponement, or buy-outs, is thereby sociology's fundamental phenomenon,' contains this first paragraph, "For ethnomethodology the objective reality of social facts, in that and just how it is every society's locally, endogenously produced, naturally organized, reflexively accountable, ongoing, practical achievement, being everywhere, always, only, exactly and entirely, members' work, with no time out, and with no possibility of evasion, hiding out, passing, postponement, or buy-outs, is thereby sociology's fundamental phenomenon."
Could listen all day to his work
hello guys. I'm looking for some additional information. anyone willing to help me?
Wow, great to hear Psathas live
interesting dude
My head just exploded..now i know sociology has a lot to take in really a lot.I may be crazy in the end without realising it.I like that.hhhh
I am looking at this in 2015 because of an online course. Great enlightenment!! Hope you did find some advice Clarissa...
Who is the professor?
+Tristan Laing That's Ken Leiberman
typo-Liberman
such a great lesson. do you have any other lectures from him?
+san desh He's retired from U of Oregon now. liberman@uoregon.edu
It would be really useful if David Silverman could do a small section on being a disabled researcher in his next edition on doing qualitative research. I am deaf, which obv has implications when i undertake social research, but i have always struggled to find advice in any textbooks about this. Advice would be fab :)
Beautifully clear, well presented and accurate
@bladesofmunch Does it make a difference? sometimes the direct attention to one specific strand of DNA is necessary in order to plateu in understanding that strand individually, only then, can we progress further to understand what that strand (when joined together with another strand having reached a plateu) will become together... If we look at the waving frog... and relate the action, we can easily realte such behavior to that of patches and badges. Visual and auditory messages to others of our own species to which we manipulate or intimidate, or attempt to communicate such by these actions and senses. The logical approach is to understand Man *self* first, in order to ever make sense of other creature/species behavior, otherwise we have no real understanding at all, only assumption, for we have nothing to base findings or relations on in order to relate said findings.
agreeably: words, they have different usage, based on knowledge and belief of the individual using them, trying to add weight to any word by our own knowledge or belief of it's meaning, in addition to what those words mean to the other using such words... "welcome to the jungle, we got fun & games..." Life's the journey into a land of bliss/ignorance, to which intellect had enslaved ignorance for the sake of "paid testing". If one is not willing to be enticed into the world of wants & items money can by, they are just as easily maniulated into emotional distress in order to enduce and observe the expression.
It is better to reduce the noise!
Well my young friend, let me tell you, as I am now 64 years old and after being involved in the workforce since I was 15 years of age, I know that a directive given by employers which demonstrates obedience, never stops at the first objection. I have found every employer, "medical, counselling, or trades, will go to absolutely all extremes to gain obedience. Milgrams experiment offered the truest reflection of life experiences.
excellent! i need this for my quiz tomorrow!
simply amazing. thanks for posting.
Umm. The way to make an ethnomethodology cake is to make and bake it AT the party with the full participation of the attendees. Yes?
Please: ethno-metho-DOL-logy. NOT ethno-meth-ology.
Hi Edward! Nice to see you on youtube with my future supervisor, Dr.Chevalier. Cheers, Margarita
edgy banksy stencil br0
Yeh, it could be put that way. Indeed, there are notable clashes between those who use post-structuralist forms of inquiry and those who use CA, DP and Ethno stuff. There is a famous journal debate between Margaret Wetherell, Emanuel Schegloff and Michael Billig in the late 90's that explores these issues, mostly concerning methodological issues when analysing conversational data.
I would disagree that discursive psychology makes this kind of ontological statement about mental states. Whether or not mental states exist doesn't matter, in the sense of whether they have the quality of 'thingness' or not. It's the epistemics of invoking 'mental states' which is the issue under focus. A paper by Nigel Edley called 'Unravelling Social Constructionism' discusses this kind of ontology/epistemic issue. However, I do agree with the social object bit obviously lol.
No, this is what cognitive psychology does which may surprise you in the context of your post lol. What discursive psychology does is re-specify the common sense assumption that language leads to, or in other words, is a conduit to mental states. Instead, psychological terms are analysed in terms of how they are deployed interactionally to do some sort of action within that particular interactional context.
Hi AIEMCA. I've recently completed an MRES in Educational Research. Although my dissertation was interested in Foucault and post-structuralist stuff, I've read considerably within the DP, CA and Ethno fields throughout my higher educational life and find them very interesting. Just thought I'd put that out there lol.
Of course, as you probably have read, there is a complex and interesting relationship between post-structuralism and CA, DP and Ethno stuff. There sort of intertwined but different when it comes to issues of methodology and method.
Very well put. To me, this is the fundamental strength of CA, DP and Ethno work because it avoids theoretical imperialism in the sense that it isn't boxing what happens in daily life into an analyst's favourite theory of explanation. Of course, I'm not denying that CA, DP and Ethno aren't theoretically informed as that would be silly but it's the ways in which this body of work re-specifies life as it's lived which is important.
Superb explanation Anne.
g'day aiemca soungue twister! you're cute ;)
g'day AIEMCA tongue twister
fabulastico, it really gonna help
@aussiepicnic I'll follow up if I come across a possible candidate, you'd be surprised how many scholars (especially US ones) are steeped in ethno and phenomenology.
Love these interviews. They are a great resource. But why didn't you follow up on the theme of phenomenology? It would have been nice to have had Prof Psathas' take on that connection, given that he is possibly one of the few who actually understand the roots of CA.
@xbekaaahxS2 No. Discursive psychology is arguing that these mental states don't exist, and they are in fact social objects. See Derek Edwards video on this :-)
Nice, elegant description of what's going on in discursive psychology. Thanks Derek!
:)
@paulvsmith No, it's participant's eye view of a flashmob. Somewhere in between data and teaching. A little OT for the channel but it was the easiest hosting option.
Is this data or just on the wrong channel?
For more on this check out Schegloff, E. A. (2005). On Integrity in Inquiry...of the investigated, not the investigator. Discourse Studies, 7(4-5), 455-80. And Levinson's interesting reply entitled "Living with Manny's dangerous idea" (same issue)
It doesn't ipso-facto change your life, but I do think people doing CA, DP and ethno end up more grounded. There's a simple reason for this - we stress that it is those involved in the talk/action that know best about it, and they display that knowledge for our convenient analysis. So it changes the power relation of 'theory/findings'. We privilege the understandings of everyday people and their commonsense categories, we don't try to invent new ones. That can make you grounded :)
"Well I invited you here to tell us; so no, I don't know.
Hi. I find ethnomethodology very interesting and I'm using it for my masters thesis. I'm particularly interested how ethnomethodology describes the researcher's relationship to the research. I'm currently reading a Hugh Mehan's work and Carolyn Baker's work on membership categorisation