High Performance Stoicism
High Performance Stoicism
  • 138
  • 13 632
The Most Important Thing In Stoicism
If you want to join my Free High Performance Stoicism FB group:
highperformancestoicism.com/fb
If you want to apply for High Performance Stoicism Coaching fill out this form: highperformancestoicism.com/fb
Переглядів: 14

Відео

Stoics: The Whole Circumstance Technique
Переглядів 2312 годин тому
If you want to join my Free High Performance Stoicism FB group, apply here: highperformancestoicism.com/fb If you are interested in High# Performance Stoicism Coaching, fill out this form: highperformancestoicism.com/fb #stoic #stoicism #temptation #self-control #wisdom
Stoics: Why You Make Foolish Decisions
Переглядів 4819 годин тому
If you want to join my Free High Performance Stoicism FB group, highperformancestoicism.com/fb If you want to apply for High Performance Stoicism Coaching, fill out this form: highperformancestoicism.com/fb
Improve Your Life Today With Stoic Harmony
Переглядів 23День тому
Improve Your Life Today With Stoic Harmony
Stoic Reframing
Переглядів 7414 днів тому
Stoic Reframing
Two Kinds of Stoic Technique
Переглядів 6314 днів тому
Two Kinds of Stoic Technique
Stoicism: The Most Important Relationship of Your Life
Переглядів 22421 день тому
Stoicism: The Most Important Relationship of Your Life
Basic Stoic Psychology
Переглядів 2721 день тому
Basic Stoic Psychology
The Stoic Way To See Your Romantic Partner
Переглядів 5528 днів тому
The Stoic Way To See Your Romantic Partner
The Stoic View of Romantic Relationships
Переглядів 310Місяць тому
The Stoic View of Romantic Relationships
Nature and Convention in Stoicism
Переглядів 34Місяць тому
Nature and Convention in Stoicism
The Stoic Way To Forget Your Ex
Переглядів 1,2 тис.Місяць тому
The Stoic Way To Forget Your Ex
The Most Exciting Results of Practicing Stoicism
Переглядів 63Місяць тому
The Most Exciting Results of Practicing Stoicism
Stoicism: Wholehearted Action On Good and Bad Days
Переглядів 30Місяць тому
Stoicism: Wholehearted Action On Good and Bad Days
A New Definition of Stoicism
Переглядів 19Місяць тому
A New Definition of Stoicism
The Many Uses of Stoicism
Переглядів 18Місяць тому
The Many Uses of Stoicism
The Stoic Hi Bye Technique For Self-Control
Переглядів 93Місяць тому
The Stoic Hi Bye Technique For Self-Control
What Stoic Book To Start With
Переглядів 3910 місяців тому
What Stoic Book To Start With
Virtues Aren’t Necessarily “Moral”
Переглядів 202 роки тому
Virtues Aren’t Necessarily “Moral”
The Virtues Within Us
Переглядів 182 роки тому
The Virtues Within Us
How Not To Take Things Personally
Переглядів 342 роки тому
How Not To Take Things Personally
Why We Take Things Personally
Переглядів 1172 роки тому
Why We Take Things Personally
Who Benefits in the Relationship?
Переглядів 142 роки тому
Who Benefits in the Relationship?
In Retrospect & In Prospect
Переглядів 122 роки тому
In Retrospect & In Prospect
The Upside of Every Situation
Переглядів 142 роки тому
The Upside of Every Situation
Perspective Steps
Переглядів 312 роки тому
Perspective Steps
The Hinge of All Improvement
Переглядів 212 роки тому
The Hinge of All Improvement
The Key to Lasting Improvement
Переглядів 222 роки тому
The Key to Lasting Improvement
Acting Confidently
Переглядів 322 роки тому
Acting Confidently
Everything is Fuel
Переглядів 252 роки тому
Everything is Fuel

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @Benitob157
    @Benitob157 Годину тому

    Very well explained

  • @vinsaintmichael
    @vinsaintmichael 2 години тому

    Thank you, Sophos Kaspar.

  • @deemastermind
    @deemastermind 5 днів тому

    Do you use tags when uploading? I think you need to promote your business.

  • @deemastermind
    @deemastermind 7 днів тому

    Your goal should be in harmony with nature

  • @deemastermind
    @deemastermind 7 днів тому

    Wise knowledge

  • @deemastermind
    @deemastermind 7 днів тому

    I'm Amit Chaudhary. This is my youtube channel.

  • @deemastermind
    @deemastermind 7 днів тому

  • @deemastermind
    @deemastermind 7 днів тому

  • @meditatingstoic7924
    @meditatingstoic7924 9 днів тому

    Keep rocking bro!

  • @MildlyHumorous-cq1nn
    @MildlyHumorous-cq1nn 10 днів тому

    Its a belief, i respect it but the argument isnt convincing. Theres no evidence universe got anything planned for you.

  • @et1821
    @et1821 13 днів тому

    Happy New Year and may all your dreams be blessed in health and lots of joy

  • @et1821
    @et1821 14 днів тому

    Impossible when you have inconsiderate relatives, happy holidays

    • @highperformancestoicism8263
      @highperformancestoicism8263 14 днів тому

      It's impossible when one believes it's impossible. Just ask the people who do have inconsiderate relatives and can handle the situation.

  • @patrickgrengs7594
    @patrickgrengs7594 17 днів тому

    Your video just appeared in my feed. Unlike so many other "stoic" pod-casters and channels -- your content and delivery is spot on. You could be a speech / communications instructor. Thank you for the excellent content and for delivering it professionally (I was in Toastmasters decades ago and can appreciate your speaking skills). New subscriber -- Thank you.

  • @damienlinnell6627
    @damienlinnell6627 17 днів тому

    The most important relationship is with God❤

    • @highperformancestoicism8263
      @highperformancestoicism8263 17 днів тому

      @@damienlinnell6627 and what would you say happens to someone who fails in their relationship with God?

  • @LeaderSamego
    @LeaderSamego 20 днів тому

    FROM TODAY YOUR MY ENGLISH TEACHER 🖤

  • @deemastermind
    @deemastermind 29 днів тому

    Applying these into reality and doing the work leads to amazing results.

  • @MikeGathercole
    @MikeGathercole Місяць тому

    I've been through so many break-ups in my time (going through one right now) but it's never fun. I'm used to it and I know what to do.

  • @dannnyjos
    @dannnyjos Місяць тому

    Hello David. Please be stoic, get a microphone brother.

  • @michaelmackey754
    @michaelmackey754 Місяць тому

    Thanks!

  • @thewanderingmind6013
    @thewanderingmind6013 3 місяці тому

    Can a beginner understand its contents & language??

  • @Charivers
    @Charivers 4 місяці тому

    Keep this up

    • @highperformancestoicism8263
      @highperformancestoicism8263 4 місяці тому

      I certainly will.

    • @Charivers
      @Charivers 4 місяці тому

      @@highperformancestoicism8263 Cool, Nice to meet you by the way

    • @highperformancestoicism8263
      @highperformancestoicism8263 4 місяці тому

      @@Charivers it's my pleasure. By the way I have a FB group on Stoicism and high performance, just in case you're interested: highperformancestoicism.com/fb

    • @Charivers
      @Charivers 4 місяці тому

      @@highperformancestoicism8263 Sure I will get in touch with you friend Did you do the videos yourself?

    • @highperformancestoicism8263
      @highperformancestoicism8263 4 місяці тому

      @@Charivers yes I did.

  • @TopNotchPersona
    @TopNotchPersona 10 місяців тому

    That's likely a good one considering its length. Personally, I feel an overview to Stoicism might be best for people who are completely ignorant to the topic. I remember trying to read Marcus Aurelius' Meditations and being so confused, but after I read How To Think Like A Roman Emperor by Donald Robertson and The Obstacle Is The Way by Ryan Holiday, Aurelius was much more accessible. Do you teach your classes any overview stuff or do you stick with primary sources?

    • @highperformancestoicism8263
      @highperformancestoicism8263 10 місяців тому

      I have my students read primary sources. Confusion and grappling with the texts is part of the process of learning and growing toward wisdom. There are passages that aren't easy to understand for anyone at first contact. Then in class I explain the whole and whatever needs to be added, given their views. Here's my introduction to Stoicism: vip.highperformancestoicism.com/pog

  • @Linerr-r1d
    @Linerr-r1d 2 роки тому

    Great very interesting!

  • @Linerr-r1d
    @Linerr-r1d 2 роки тому

    Wow very well explained!

  • @SAYKENG139
    @SAYKENG139 2 роки тому

    Learning something new from you today. Have downloaded your article and will read it shortly. Thanks, David.

  • @TopNotchPersona
    @TopNotchPersona 2 роки тому

    Great video, David! Stoicism needs to make a come back. Looking forward to what other topics you have planned. Subbed 😎👍

  • @Aditya-pz7ux
    @Aditya-pz7ux 2 роки тому

    Great sir.... Massive respect... Good content and your channel itself is a testimony of your stoic mindset . I am 21 past 2 years trying to get even 1 % of what i read and on surface i seems stoic but at core i am not , there are somethings that still bothers me even though they shouldn't . As of now my career its not taking off i am not failing but also not succeeding i am just flowing , learning a lot though about failures, friends, family, about myself .I hardly comment but out of respect for your dedication i did and now after wasting all day watching web series or that now i am feeling light and can go to a good Night sleep and Great morning ahead. And I just subscribed.

    • @highperformancestoicism8263
      @highperformancestoicism8263 2 роки тому

      Thank you for your comment, Aditya. I understand exactly what you are experiencing. We think certain things *shouldn't* bother us but they do. As with all things, developing a Stoic internal skillset takes time, but because the standards are very high, to achieve what the Stoics describe as ideal takes some more time. I would like to help you with your understanding of Stoicism and also with your practice. Please consider joining my FB group here: highperformancestoicism.com, where there is daily content and discussion with others who want to be high performers. And if you would like you can email me directly for coaching and consulting here is the address: dkaspar@highperformancestoicism.com. Lastly, thank you for subscribing to my channel.

    • @Aditya-pz7ux
      @Aditya-pz7ux 2 роки тому

      @@highperformancestoicism8263 Sorry sir I don't use Facebook . But uses Telegram So you can make a Group and Add lile minded individuals.

    • @highperformancestoicism8263
      @highperformancestoicism8263 2 роки тому

      @@Aditya-pz7ux I understand. We all have our preferences of social media.

  • @oliver_siegel
    @oliver_siegel 2 роки тому

    Reminds me of "antifragility". Rather than just being robust or resilient against adversity, one improves

    • @highperformancestoicism8263
      @highperformancestoicism8263 2 роки тому

      Yes. Stoicism, properly understood, is antifragile...even though Nassim Taleb says otherwise in the book of that name.

  • @koreysamuelson5156
    @koreysamuelson5156 2 роки тому

    Yes. My favourite Seneca quote: "Philosophy teaches us to act, and not just to speak. It demands of everyone that he should actually live by his own standards, that his life should not be out of harmony with his words, and that his inner existence should be of one hue, and fully harmonious with all his outer activities. This, I say, is the highest duty and the highest proof there is of real wisdom--that deed and word should be in accord, that a man should be equal to himself under all circumstances, and that he always should be the same." (Epistulae Morales I, 135 Trans. Richard Gummere)

    • @highperformancestoicism8263
      @highperformancestoicism8263 2 роки тому

      That is indeed a beautiful passage and provides a much fuller picture of what it means to live in harmony with oneself. Thank you for sharing it, Korey!

  • @MalakAlMaut6860
    @MalakAlMaut6860 2 роки тому

    Brilliant explanation. Thank you.

  • @jamesdaltrey4987
    @jamesdaltrey4987 2 роки тому

    The Stoics had nothing against people becoming wealthy and powerful, to clear that up A good life can be lead by someone wealthy and powerful. Also A good life can be lead by someone abjectly poor and without influence. Neither poverty nor wealth are any measure of a good life, and a life lived well in poverty is superior to any life at all lead in the pursuit of luxury for its own sake.

    • @highperformancestoicism8263
      @highperformancestoicism8263 2 роки тому

      Almost everything you say captures the Stoic view well. I would amend one point you make to read: Neither poverty nor wealth in itself is any measure of a good life.

  • @spiritual-preneur
    @spiritual-preneur 2 роки тому

    Ok

  • @oliver_siegel
    @oliver_siegel 2 роки тому

    Makes sense! Sometimes it can be difficult to prioritize that "one thing", especially if it's a puzzle with many interdependent variables...

    • @highperformancestoicism8263
      @highperformancestoicism8263 2 роки тому

      Yes, it can be difficult to determine your daily priority. The priority I am discussing here is more abstract, and concerns your long-term project and your craft. How would you define your craft?

    • @oliver_siegel
      @oliver_siegel 2 роки тому

      @@highperformancestoicism8263 great question! I consider my mission to inventory problems and collect solutions to make the world a better place. My craft for that ought to be to lead and inspire people to learn, align, and take action.

    • @highperformancestoicism8263
      @highperformancestoicism8263 2 роки тому

      @@oliver_siegel Problem analysis leader. Does that capture what you do and aspire to be?

    • @oliver_siegel
      @oliver_siegel 2 роки тому

      @@highperformancestoicism8263 that's a very concise, fitting description! Thank you!

    • @highperformancestoicism8263
      @highperformancestoicism8263 2 роки тому

      @@oliver_siegel You're most welcome. I'm so glad that works!

  • @josephcoon5809
    @josephcoon5809 2 роки тому

    2:00 “How We Should Argue” being about political discourse doesn’t sound very Stoic to me. Politics is the antithesis of virtue, and government is the antithesis of evolution. Evolution is driven by natural selection which requires competition provided choices while government, by definition, restricts choice by removing competition. As government grows larger, more choices go away. Democracy is not the only solution to disagreement, and it is far from the best option. Ideological segregation is the most natural, moral, and efficient option. This is how the brain develops as well as every other large and functional system. The only need one has for laws is to impose their will on those who disagree. By associating with those you agree with, laws become definitions of the society that has adopted them. This decentralization automatically cures issues like mass incarceration by allowing the individual an opportunity to move to the society that best fits their worldview. Political argument results in one party begrudgingly accepting terms they disagree with and forced to abide by them through threats of force or actual force. Failing to meet the contractual obligations of a law is what results in mass incarceration of non-violent offenders. Expulsion, rather than incarceration, would relieve the offended society from expending resources on “humane punishments” that only enrich jailers. It would also preserve MOST of the offending individual’s freedom, limiting only the societies in which they can live. This preservation of freedom also keeps families intact. Both of your eyes provide two different two dimensional images of the world. Even though the images are not in agreement, the brain has learned to reconcile the DIFFERENCES between the conflicting images and acquire a THREE dimensional understanding of the world that each perspective is incapable of on their own. Arguing to exclude some worldview over the others only serves to limit society’s understanding of the world to lower and lower dimensionalities of understanding. Allow and inspire people to find those who think the same as they do and congregate. By segregating ideologically, every group can be freed to build the society they envision without wasting time and effort trying to convince others or others imposing their will on them. Should a society prove the worth of their ideas through example, then other societies will be free to emulate, or adapt those ideas as they see fit. Ultimately, Stoicism is about Natural Order, and politics is antithetical to Natural Order.

    • @highperformancestoicism8263
      @highperformancestoicism8263 2 роки тому

      The Stoics believed that one should participate in public life and in politics, unless there was a good reason not to. The Stoics disagreed with and argued with Skeptics, Epicureans, and any other philosophers who were around. That is part of how the Stoics came by and developed many of their distinct doctrines. That said, I don't believe Scott's book you mention is supposed to be Stoic. Also, I believe the idea of the book is 'since you are going to be disagreeing with others about politics, here's how you ought to do it' rather than 'go out there and start arguing with people!'

    • @josephcoon5809
      @josephcoon5809 2 роки тому

      @@highperformancestoicism8263 What is the purpose of politics? In my eyes, it is the process of establishing laws to mold society. What stoic believes that laws should dictate what individuals do? I agree with participating in public life, but that has absolutely nothing to do with imposing one’s will on others. That’s the path that leads to executing men like Socrates.

    • @josephcoon5809
      @josephcoon5809 2 роки тому

      @@highperformancestoicism8263 Ultimately, disagreement in politics has two main outcomes: the party in power imposes tyranny on the other OR people segregate based on their opinions. The first option is politics/tyranny whereas the second option is freedom.

  • @mikehagen2270
    @mikehagen2270 2 роки тому

    Excellent presentation. Thank you.

  • @marks.3798
    @marks.3798 2 роки тому

    Thank you. Very much enjoyed this.

  • @jamesdaltrey4987
    @jamesdaltrey4987 2 роки тому

    What is "Up to Us" is not what Scott Aiken is talking about at all.... It is a proper rookie error... Also the Stoics didn't have an idea of a "Will" at all, that comes later in history...

  • @jamilaahdidan
    @jamilaahdidan 3 роки тому

    Thank you 🙂

  • @niranjanscover9316
    @niranjanscover9316 3 роки тому

    Nice video

  • @goncalomateus8497
    @goncalomateus8497 3 роки тому

    Do you have any recommendations of books on stoicism? I'm interested in understanding the philosophy more deeply and contrasting it with aristotelianism. Great video as always.

    • @highperformancestoicism8263
      @highperformancestoicism8263 3 роки тому

      Thank you, Goncalo. I appreciate it. My recommended way to get started is (1) Enchiridion by Epictetus (translated Nicholas White), (2) Meditations by Marcus Aurelius (translated Maxwell Staniforth), (3) Stoicism by John Sellars (the best short introduction to Stoicism). (1) and (2) get better the more you read them, the more you understand Stoicism. It's remarkable.

    • @goncalomateus8497
      @goncalomateus8497 3 роки тому

      @@highperformancestoicism8263 Thank you. Looking forward to reading those books and watching more of your videos

  • @ExplainedThroughRap
    @ExplainedThroughRap 3 роки тому

    This is awesome, really clear, concise. Thanks this was a great resource for the rap I just dropped about stoicism on my channel.

  • @goncalomateus8497
    @goncalomateus8497 3 роки тому

    I don't get the connection between us wanting many different things and the idea that we should be content with the short term results of our rational actions. Also, I don't really understand what it means to say that reason forms a closed system with its results. What does "closed" mean in this context? Thank you. I love these videos

    • @highperformancestoicism8263
      @highperformancestoicism8263 3 роки тому

      Thank you, Goncalo. On the first point, we do want many different external things in life. If we think about the actions we take to get them, in terms primarily of the things, then mentally, we are going in different directions after different things out of our power. Our thinking, you could say, would be 'open system thinking'. So the standard by which we evaluate our action would include, not just the working of reason, but also whether we get the thing. If we alter our thinking about such actions, and consider them in terms of what reason prescribes, we have simplified our understanding of what we are doing. Also, for whatever reason prescribes, if it is within our power, and we do it, we have succeeded. So attaining the external object doesn't enter in as part of our standard for evaluating our actions.

  • @goncalomateus8497
    @goncalomateus8497 3 роки тому

    Great video!

  • @helenpowell1809
    @helenpowell1809 3 роки тому

    fvvrd vur.fyi

  • @faracherie812
    @faracherie812 3 роки тому

    6p2gp #vyn.fyi