Відео

Miller William Allen Betty Lopez Frank

Brown Carol Moore Nancy Taylor Mark

Williams Elizabeth Perez Deborah Taylor Carol

Square Cube Law Mentioned!!!! 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

This is amazing. You rock!

yes, i saw the video from start to finish, yes, i'm that nerdy

Something I find very sad is how many UA-cam commenters I can find on basically any documentary about evolution who say that "living fossils" like coelacanths "disprove evolution" and therefore the only other option is specifically the creation story from the bible. Makes me lose faith in humanity. Also, I took psychic damage from the scaly, broken-wrist Velociraptors.

This really expands on what I learned about vertebrates being neotenic from the Trey the Explainer video about neoteny!

Thank you!!

Thank you!

nice video, was actaully looking for an explanation of THE EVOLUTION OF MUSCULAR SYSTEM IN TETRAPODS but this video helped a lot

Thank you so much! This is such an easy explanation to such a difficult topic!

what if we will find a wcth with DNA and self replication system? do we need to conclude design or natural process in that case?

This video is wonderful!

Hello. I am very interested in this topic. I have several questions. Where can I contact you? Please email me at von.tagarino@gmail.com.

ua-cam.com/video/F8kHmWM2IfA/v-deo.html Pls check this out

#first comment

Thanks for your comprehensive explanation.

Mam i am from india good information

thank you so much for this ;D

If the codon at DNA level is TTC, how can it be AAG at mRNA level? I am confused. Because the codon is from the sense strand of DNA and mRNA is a copy of the sense strand. So I believe at mRNA level it should be UUC. Kindly clarify.

Good information

does this and the other video thoroughly go over chapter 7? btw love your videos!!!!

super helpful !! thanks :)

Good explanation.

really helpful !!!!

Evolution became a laughable myth in the 20th century, during which it was disproved by millions of discoveries. One such discovery is that polymerase is a product of it's own translation, which proves Special Creation. Another is the discovery that the cell's structural design is not generated by genetic information, but is instead passed on by reproduction form the reproductive cells of the parents (Cortical Inheritance) which traces back to the original created organism. Evolutionism is a philosophy which is contradicted by science. Over 100 yrs ago, Evolution Theory was plausible for naturalists because of their rejection of God. Biological science was rudimentary and archaic, and provided no information about the operations of the cell. Modern biology has very greatly changed what is known of genetics and biology. It has been discovered that life is based upon information which is digitally encoded and stored in a more compressed form than man's best computer compression schemes. DNA is a material medium encoded with information which is organized to conform to linguistics, possesses algorithmic information processing operations, and the human language properties of phonetics, semantics, punctuation, syntax, grammar, and aprobetics. The information input and output processing of DNA includes the analytical operations of proofreading, information comparison, cut, insert, copy-and-past, backup, and restore, all of which operate by algorithmic operations. There is no potential for the material actions of chemistry to produce information, algorithms, and linguistics. They are non-physical fundamental entities that can only be produced by intelligence. This fact is proof that all life was designed by a mind of supreme intelligence. Because of this and many other biological discoveries, it has been overwhelmingly demonstrated that evolution is impossible and creation is a scientific fact. DNA is a 4-dimentional (3 dimentions + time) operating system which is far more complex than man's computer software technology, posessing many thousands of information hierarchies and pathways in the cell. When the DNA molecule is supercoiled as chromatin, some of it's information is available to the cell which is not available when the molecule is uncoiled, and when it is not supercoiled, some of it's information is available to the cell which is not available when it is supercoiled. DNA is a dual-directional information package, providing different information depending upon which strand and direction the transcription machinery of the cell is traveling. Man does not know how to to write computer software that can be read both forward and backwards to provide separate information processes and functionality. It is beyond our ability. DNA's individual information sequences are overlapping and nested sharing nucleotides between sequences, and information in different locations of the molecule are interdependent with each other, even when separated by hundreds or thousands of base pairs in distance from each other - a feature which exemplifies why chemical processes cannot design DNA. DNA possesses codes built upon codes which regulate the use of each other, even when they are distant from each other in the molecule. Genetic algorithms and information possess forward-thinking properties, which nature is incapable of producing because molecules are not sentient. During an organism's development, the genetic information instructs the cell on how to turn on and off, like chemical switches, many sequences of information of the DNA in a supremely complex and yet to be understood orchestral arrangement of various groupings and orders so as to build the structures of the organism over time. These patterns of genes being switched on and off is so complex that man will likely never be able to decipher it. DNA an information package - a physical medium encoded with information. Information is a non-material entity 1. Information is purposeful - it describes something meaningful such as data, function, concept, or process. 2. Information cannot be physically measured because it has no physical dimentions or mass - the concept of measuring one pound or one meter of information is nonsensical. 3. Information is not bound to whatever medium upon which it is encoded. Example: The information in a book can be spoken or copied onto any other medium without the information changing in any way. 4. If information were comprised of or a property of matter, it would not be possible to convey information without relocation of the material medium upon which it is encoded. Examples: a. Reading a book: If information and minds were both physical, it would be impossible to receive (read) the information in a book without relocating the materal of the book into the brain of the reader. b. Reading a printed message to another person: If information and minds were both physical, it would be impossible to convey (read aloud) the information in a book without relocating the materal of the book into the brain of the listener. c. Speaking to an audience: If information and minds were both physical, it would be impossible to share information to an audience without relocating the material of the provider's brain to the brains of the each member of the audience. 10 Laws of Nature Regarding Information, which prove evolution false and prove creation is true: 1. Anything material, such as physical/chemical processes, cannot create something non-material 2. Information is a non-material fundamental entity and not a property of matter 3. Information requires a material medium for storage and transmission 4. Information cannot arise from statistical processes 5. There can be no information without a code - no thought or idea can be shared without a code 6. All codes result from an intentional choice and agreement between sender and recipient 7. The determination of meaning for and from a set of symbols is a mental process that requires intelligence 8. There can be no new information without an intelligent, purposeful sender 9. Any given chain of information can be traced back to an intelligent source 10. Information comprises the non-material foundation for all: a. technological systems b. works of art c. biological systems Therefore: 1. Since the DNA code of all life is clearly within the definition domain of information, we conclude that there must be a sender 2. Since the density and complexity of the DNA encoded information is billions of times greater than man's present technology, we conclude that the sender must be supremely intelligent 3. Since the sender must have a. encoded (stored) the information into the DNA molecules, b. constructed the molecular biomachines required for the encoding, decoding, and synthesizing process and, c. designed all the features for the original life forms, We conclude the sender must be purposeful and supremely powerful. 4. Since information is a non-material fundamental entity and cannot originate from material quantities, we conclude that the sender must have a non-material component 5. Since information is a non-material fundamental entity and cannot originate from material quantities, and since information also originates from man, we conclude man's nature must have a non-material component (spirit) 6. Since information is a non-material entity, we conclude that the assumption "the universe is comprised solely of mass and energy" is false. 7. Since: 1) biological information originates only from an intelligent sender and, 2) all theories of chemical and biological evolution require that information must originate solely from mass and energy alone (without a sender), we conclude that all theories or concepts of biological evolution are false. Anyone who disagrees with these laws and conclusions must falsify them by demonstrating the initial origin of information from purely material sources. Therefore, the laws of nature about information have: 1. refuted the assumption of scientific materialism and the theories of chemical and biological evolution 2. all philosophies or theories based on the assumption of scientific materialism including chemical and biological evolution are falsified by the laws of nature about information.

❤️

thanks

Hi

Very nice explanation, i found this very helpfull

The explanation has helped a lot but I am still a bit confused. If the purpose of this process is to find QTLs for a trait, then how would we be able to tell if the black and yellow dots are still associated with their respective markers before we phenotype? Unless we come to the conclusion that the sequences in the vicinity of the marker are a QTL until after we have done the marker/phenotype correlation?

thank you .. this helped me a lot

Why you gotta use h^2 but only use H? Everyone plays with squaring and not in different ways! Cavalli-Sforza / Bodmer do without the square, wiki uses it for both, you mix and match!

Great explanations !!

Thank you...!!!

Very interesting

Darwin postulates are correct. The second dude is lost , changes in an organism structure are not heritable .mutations (mistakes in dna replication) are the source of all genetic variation , the good and the bads , You are ignoring the vast amount of information we have about genetics

Helpful video!!!

Is it same for bees

This is really helpful, thanks a lot

Hii Kristion I have some questios regarding Genetic and QTL. if possible please give Answers 1)How to distinguish quantitative trait and polygenic trait? 2) How to dealing with simple and complex trait? 3)How quantitative trait express? 4) How to localize genome regions or chromosome region in QTL? 5) How can we use trait distributions and segregating populations in order to genetic factors involve? 6) How can we combine phenotype distribution from mapping population with genotype data from mapping population, in order find correlation between marker polymorphism and trait polymorphism? 7) How to map QTL? 8)Mechanism of complex trait for QTL analysis? single gene for QTL analysis? 10)Regulation of complex traits? Thank you

Was so lost throughout till u made a comparison with gas gauge and gas lvl ty

Great video! This really helped me understand the prerequisite material for my chordata anatomy course.

Thank you, you made it crystal clear!

This is an excellent explanation! Thank you so much!

I am surprised how few likes this video has received. It is very clear and interesting. Well done :-)

As a high school student, I had to watch this video over many times to fully understand it. However, it was very helpful in my project on lead neurotoxicology in drosophila. Thank you!

James Hutton and Georges Cuvier were both biological essentialists. Here's my podcast showing how essentialism relates to the age of the earth >> app.box.com/s/jaze8336kqs6pzsked56h97y57i14osx In Stephen Jay Gould's gem Time’s Arrow, Time’s Cycle (p. 114) he provides this nugget from Boyce Rensberger: Until Lyell published his book [Principles of Geology], most thinking people accepted the idea that the earth was young, and that even its most spectacular features such a mountains and valleys, islands and continents were the products of sudden, cataclysmic events… My newly updated book untangles the wrangle over the age of the earth: www.amazon.com/YES-WorldView-Fallacies-Collapse-Darwinism/dp/0692320075

You have saved my life, this explanation is awesome