Відео

We are so lucky to have Professor Mann speak out about the real science of global warming! He has courageously spoken out about the truth of climate change science! No wonder he got the Nobel Prize with other scientists of the IPCC! Bravo!!

source? sounds like chatgpt copy pasta to me

Late to this party but I'm thrilled nonetheless to come across this terrific interview. Professor Finkelstein has long carried the weight of publicly proclaiming the atrocity committed against Palestinians. Sadly, I'm pleased to see an interview with the conscientious and courageous Professor prior to the added weight and sadness of the events of, and following, October 7, 2023. Thank you. Murder is a crime. Collective punishment is criminal genocide.

Thank you Dr. Finkelstein, God bless you! ❤️

He is truly authentic.

'promo sm'

all that is left for MMT proponents to do is to decide how many angels dance on the had of a pin.

Michaelson Morely experiment was flawed. Quantum Superposition is a lie and everything based on it. Everything is deterministic.

Brokies wanting to go to college Lmao

Yeah right!

CO2. Is an invisible gas that improves plant growth.

The earth is now much greener than our history due to fossil fuel.

The strongest tornadoes in history happened in 1974 where it had 7 EF5 tornadoes.

3:32 shocked me. I am from Turkey and I believe he studied Sabbatai Sevi and his followers. This topic is still very rarely known in here. Marshall Sahlins was a true genius.

Fake , about as fake as it gets 😂

Co2’s heat trapping ability is a logarithmic association.Therefore to double its heat absorption co2 concentration must increase by a factor of 10.Thus co2 more than likely has very little affect on temperature.We are however due for another ice age which would be more than devastating to mankind.

What surprises me is the dulusional perception.there is an assumption of a moral high ground for the Anglo saxons which is negated by historical experiences.the gentleman offers apologia for a unipolar world without exposing the contradictions ad ills of the Anglo-Saxon imperialism.he purports to secure himself in a stupor portraying half truths ad biased historical perspective as truth.he still thinks the west has the goodies to offer for compliance.this cannot happen ad change is a constant not managed by the west or by anybody.there shall be many contradictions in the hegelian sense but this gentleman is not exposed to dialectics.the hangover of pre world war 2 ad the euphoria ad arrogance of the 1990s persists.u trust the anglosaxon at ua own risk ad 9ur academician as a court poet ad warmonger ad cultural imperialist has nit woken up t9 reality.u can be objective ad make a point but its sad when intellectual dishonesty is used to arrive at conclusions howsoever great they maybe

Trolling

So if the real scientists with the real data such as Mr. Christy are correct, can we the little people all agree to dismantle our governments (which are FORCE) who cause things like war and hyper-inflation? I agree 100% with Ronald Reagan on one point: government is the problem.

30:50 euro is also a foreign currency so every country with the euro is currency user

Or sign a new contract for 8 more years

You left off Carleton College- why? It’s #9 on the USNews rating which is what most high schools go by.

Mann is about as honest as a lot of other academic grifters that have been found wanting lately.

Hi how can I enroll for a undergraduate degree in Biology im super interested

Dr Finkelstein Personnification of truth , honesty, seriuosness , warm greetings from Algeria

Western governor university is the best and fastest

I suspect while scientists discuss their issues the journalists and politicians pick what they like and try to make sensations and scandals. This is where many scientific facts get twisted and exaggerated. And by the way Greta Thunberg should go back to school and learn the stuff.

I'm a climato-realist and I never believed that mankind had the power to change the climate. Mankind is supposed to have the intelligence to take responsibility on the way mankind lives in its biosphere. The capitalist model based on never ending increase of ressources extraction can not stand for a few more centuries. Of course, nuclear energy is the most likely to replace fossile energy but there are AT LOT of machines that can't be powered with electricity and the batteries needed are also very polluting to fabricate. Besides the metals required for an electrified network for everybody on the planet aren't available anymore and the mining industry is the most polluting one. So nuclear energy won't save the western lifestyle based on programmed obsolence and consumerism. Mankind have to work on a most sober way to live on this earth as a matter of fact. Low-tech solutions can be invented : they are actually by the poorest one in eastern countries who can't live anymore in the previous consumerist lifestyle. It's quite clear to me that the continent where the low-tech will be more and more powerfull and inventive will be Africa while we are going to cling on the last oil drop by wars etc etc

You agree, you agree, blah blah… This insanity must stop.

Micheal Mann what a disgrace for Science..

Anyone who claims the globe is warming is a grifter for the cause of Michael Mann Climate Hysteria.

Links please ^^

I really enjoyed this discussion. Thanks for posting it. One thing I learned in my post grad research is that often rather perplexing contradictions in one field of research are easily explained by phenomena researched outside of the immediate field of research. In the case of climate change, it is worth looking at the underpinnings of 1970s politics, power, and funding cycles that have only increased with time. The desire for a common enemy to justify the creation of a world government is the motivation (as evidenced by the writings and actions of those who promote such an end). Looking, seeing, and accepting what one objectively sees can require one to overcome personal prejudices and blinkers - something Daniel Kahneman (Nobel Prize winner) and others have long warned us about. I can recommend "From Greta to the Great Reset: Making Emergencies Work" by T. Witt, 2022 in The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol. 81, No. 2 as a helpful starting point. I also recommend digging through sources. The political underpinnings of the apparent contradiction between models and actual data also underpin other sociological and political phenomena societies are currently navigating Following the money and on record statements made by those who pull the strings...

38:18 was the most interesting part of the conversation. We need to stop talking about economics like we do in the first part of the conversation and switch the conversation to entropy. Doing so eliminates endless partisan bickering and replaces it with “shut up and calculate”. If we do this then we will become a level 0 civilization.

I would love to know whether or not Hooft think AI will eventually be able to give us answers because it will not be restricted the way the human mind is.

The reason we can't air condition the earth by expelling to space the waste heat being generated after 400 years of economic growth at 2.3%/year is that you need to gather the waste heat and this requires a lot of energy. This additional energy then adds to the waste heat that you need to radiate into space. How are you going to send the energy away? Will you use lasers? After another 100 or 1000 years the lasers will be making the earth glow like a star.

In straight up denial. There is no evidence that deterrence works? maybe idk rehabilitation would be more effective.

Is it me, or does it seem to everyone else that our host is doing more than playing devils advocate here with Dr Christie and seems more of an AGW ideologue with his line of questioning. From my knowledge of thermodynamics, my understanding is that it is impossible for heat transfer to take place from the atmosphere to the land surface, firstly because the temperature gradient both between the ground and the air, and below the ground are both negative, more so below ground because of the much greater mass density of the ground (1000x) than for the air irrespective of the composition of the air so that the temperature apex is always at the ground surface independent of whether it is day or night, summer or winter. The Sun is the primary heat source in our Solar System, and the ground surface is the principal secondary heat radiator, while the atmosphere can only be a net heat sink purely on the basis of potential heat density at ambient temperatures and pressures and the nature of heat flux combined with heat convection. My understanding too is that the climate debate has been focused on the empirical data provided by temperature measurements and its variability over recorded time has been the endless subject of controversy, but there seems to be little recourse to the thermodynamics of heat transfer between solids, liquids and gases that takes place in the atmosphere on a daily basis, where latent heat flux plays a disproportionate role in the balance between sensible and latent heat, most significantly with water vapor which is commonly understood by everyone to be the primary determinant of the prevailing weather, whether as rain, hail, sleet, snow, cloud or not insignificantly ground moisture. That carbon-based compounds that dwell in the atmosphere and oceans only transiently as part of the carbon cycle have been elevated to being the primary determinants of significant thermodynamic effects in the weather seems spurious not only to me but many others, notwithstanding their ability to absorb radiation albeit in a narrow band of ambient temperature ranges (a characteristic that I believe has been crucial for plant and animal respiration and survival in cold climates in particular). Recourse to the solar spectrum reveals that the intensity of incident daylight radiation at the frequencies sensitive to these carbon-based gases is roughly 180x the intensity experienced from ambient ground temperatures, and therefore any net latent heat absorbed by carbon-based gases in the atmosphere will be firstly dissipated through sensible heat transfer with more concentrated diatomic gases in the atmosphere, and secondly through convective heat transfer with the cooler upper atmosphere, so that less effective radiation reaches the ground surface (think of how a parasol works). My understanding too is that Fourier for one would agree wholeheartedly.

But really. What company will run up on that info. I want to invest

So far.. APGMF stock is not doing anything

CO2 is essential for all plant life.

I wish young people would listen to this and become motivated again. It seems they have lost the will to be productive, because of all the fake doomsday scenarios being propagated by governments and bodies like the U.N.

Christy's data has been corrected by others numerous times over the years. The most egregious is when he failed to account for satellite drift. He has also errantly included stratospheric temperature for tropospheric temperature. This is why you always want to have rebuttals as part of any teaching video. SkepticalScience skewers his views on their site. See CLIMATE MISINFORMATION BY SOURCE: JOHN CHRISTY

The fact that micheal Mann has been caught data cheating , makes him irrelevant, Mr Christy talks common sense on climate . I will side with Mr Christy.

Common error: To attribute temperature rise for past century (or since 1880) to CO2 increases. CO2 didn't start significantly increasing until 1945. Although, even since then, temps sporadically gradually increase with no correlation.

Who gave academic credentials to Jed The Doctor who is constantly insisting on idiotic false preordered conclusions about climate based on the data that do not exists.

There aren’t more forest fires or hurricanes etc, there is just more media.

Only in a Clown world like the one we now seem to inhabit is it possible for governments to continue to get behind model after model over several decades even though just about EVERY one (of those the governments support) have turned out to be erroneous. It cannot possibly be that successive governments just HAPPEN to support the wrong models every time and it is certainly no coincidence that even after so many model failures, NOTHING significant has been done to improve the quality of the modelling. Governments would never allow drugs to be released for use on the public without thorough testing and analysis so why is this different - oh, no, wait. Scrub that last sentence. Eventually, I hope the public will realize that it isn't the Climate which needs to be radically altered, it's the Western style of government - where lies and corruption seem to be the order of the day.

What is a woman? We live in an ideologically possessed queer cult. Our universities are leaders in promoting the violence that twins with insanity. We are philosophical zombies. Does anyone, under fear of being arrested, as in Canada, dare to state what a woman is lest one's child be stolen by members of the insane state? Who can possibly trust "science" when insanity is the dominant cultural motif. I don't have and informed opinion on climate issues though I do try to follow the exchanges and presentations. I used to trust our universities. What is a woman?

Christy convincingly addresses Mann’s misconceptions. Christy and Mann have gone back and forth on this issue for decades now. In the vast majority of interactions, Christy’s view wins out.