Відео

what's wrong with your right eye?

Use total differential: d(x*y^2+x^2*y)=d6=0 d(x*y^2+x^2*y)=dx*y^2+2xy*dy+2x*dx*y+x^2*dy=0 Divide by dx and rearrange to dy/dx=-(y^2+2xy)/(x^2+2xy)

Great video man keep it up and soon you will be huge !!!

thank you for the math help

where are you from?

Great work 🔥🔥

At least eight Chinese have the same weight rounded to the nearest millionth of a Kilogram. The more interesting question is how many kilograms less is the same rounded Chinese weight compared to the same rounded American weight?

great video! its been along time and its nice to see how much u are growing!

In that second case, we could say that f(c) = b, but lim x→c f(x) = b is incorrect, right?

spot on ❤️

Hey, love your videos! I was wondering if synthetic division was the best way to solve 3rd degree+ polynomials, or if there's a better way.

Thanks a lot thats another nice tool

can you prove the basel peoblem? i would really appreciate it and i love how you explain it

I like the conciseness of the videos To the point and educational

Great video great explanation ❤need more video on algebra

I think you missed a close parenthesis in the thumbnail.

Very helpful video ❤

Hey dude, awesome video. Just out of concern, is your right eye alright? I noticed it was closed for the whole video.

Sorry for not uploading as much, I have been super busy but trying to get back on it. Let me know what else you guys want to see.

thank you so much!!!

If you allow factoring out, you can just say that (-a)×b=-(a×b) right away.

Cool trick, Btw can you make videos on some tricks of Log

basic assumption is x=y.Multiply both sides by x it becomes x²=xy.Now he subtracts y² from both sides.This is x²-y²=y(x-y). Now before going to factorizing,just compute x²-y²,considering basic assumption x=y. We obtain 0=0.

Bro had to make me click with that incorrect thumbnail damn.

Thanks man, thats one of the simplest explanation i have heard 😊😊

Please look at the sample paper: viXra:2402.0068 submitted on 2024-02-14 21:47:20 , Division by Zero 1/0 = 0/0 = 0 and Computers real.div: New Information and Many Applications then you will be able to divide the numbers and analytic function by zero with a natural sense and you will find a new world. Indeed, several computer systems use its convention already. Please see viXra:2402.0068 submitted on 2024-02-14 21:47:20 , Division by Zero 1/0 = 0/0 = 0 and Computers real.div: New Information and Many Applications In Snowflake　 DIV0: This function performs division similar to the division operator (/), but instead of reporting an error, it returns 0 when the divisor is 0. I think the division by zero is very fundamental and important in general people. 2024/01/06 - ゼロ除算（divide by zero）とは、ある数を0で割ること。数学では定義できない計算と解釈され、コンピュータ上では実行不能としてエラーを生じたり、無限 .. ゼロによる除算エラーの処理 IBM www.ibm.com › docs ゼロによる除算は、「Query ファイルのオープン (OPNQRYF)」コマンドではエラーとみなされます。 ただし、ゼロの結果を受け取り、ゼロ除算エラーを防ぐことができます ... ゼロによる除算エラーの処理 最終更新: 2021-04-14 2024.4.20 Microsoft Excel に　ゼロ除算採用1/0=0の兆しが見える。 下記、#DIV/0! の代わりに 0 または "値なし" を表示し、　の部分です。ゼロ除算は考えてはならないが　数学界の常識ですが、ゼロ除算が現れたとき、　間違い、　解なし、計算機が止まるなど、　不便な状況が起きて居た。近年、1/0=0　が広く採用されるようになってきた。ゼロ除算にゼロを返すは、厳格数学で、自然な意味での拡張された分数でそうなりますが、　便利だからという理由で多用されるようになってきた。意味合いとしても、ゼロで割るは　考えてはならない、　不可能である、そのような場合ゼロで表すことが良いことが　広範に分かってきた。ゼロの意味の発見です。Coq, Lean,IBM　等は　更に深い理解で、ゼロ除算が利用されている。　Microsoft Excelは　便利だからの理解で、　弱いようである。２０２４．４．２０．１１：３５ 2024.2.24.5:36 2024.3.7.06:04 2024.3.31.8:50 2024.4.12.9:28 2024.4.17.6:54 2024.4.20.15:6

thumbnail has x^n + y^n by mistake

i’m so happy i found this channel you explain stuff so well

Great Explanation ❤❤

amazing video again!

great video as alwaуs!

Awesome explanation. Have a good day

Bro only see's the LHS 💀

Nice video!

0 x 0 equals 0

Here before your channel blows up

Except obvious division by x - y, you can't go from 2y = y => 2 = 1 without clarifying that y != 0.

How x = y we have: x - y = 0. Dividing by zero is an indetermination and when u got something wrong in math the result can be literaly anything

I always like to use this example as an introduction to mathematical proofs - it shows they aren't always right. This is a common trick proof, in fact I believe one of my textbooks contains this exact proof. That being said, it is a great introduction as I said.

You should fix your title. You are not proving or deriving the quadratic equation. You are deriving the quadratic formula.

ive literally done this by accident before

Where does the x go from x+y=y to 2y=y ?

Bro doesn't open the second eyes because its too powerful for the universe to handle

Hey!, Noah my name is also Noah! And I love math, (mostly multiplication) so I searched up 2^2^2^2^2 (2^65536) and it would be a number with almost 20,000 digits! For those who don't understand, that's like 2x2 65536 times try saying "two times two" 65536 times! In the simplest terms, it's just duplicating 2 65k times. So hope this helped you guys understand how astronomically large this number is. Also maybe a Pin? 📌📌📌📌

urr, UH OH! BORING ALERT‼ Heres a better proof: "the enemy of your enemy is your friend." thank me lateeerrrrrrrrrrrrr

Thanks for explaining the formula. I've never understood it before.

You cannot divide by (X-Y) since X=Y implying that X-Y=0 so you divided by zero which is the error. I had fun thinking about this question I wish to see more of these challenges

error is that your using algebra to solve for a mathematical rule which is 1,2,3

1(1+1)/2 = 1. Base case good n = 1 n(n+1)/2 + n + 1 = (n+1)(n+2)/2 Inductive step good. where n(n+1)/2 was our assumption of truth for n, and n+1 is adding the next term in the sequence. Hence by well ordering principle, works for all nat nums.

Nice proof, good job