Відео

White Amy Garcia Charles Smith Helen

38:40 ua-cam.com/video/foj4sfQP3ek/v-deo.html

My bud where are you

𝕡𝕣𝕠𝕞𝕠𝕤𝕞 🤔

modern 2022 brainwashing/ Ukraine & Soviet Union Hitler methods apply to the west occident 2022/ warning 🤔👽 Aldous Huxley - Speech at UC Berkeley, The Ultimate Revolution 1962 ua-cam.com/video/5RX-iUfPJ9I/v-deo.html via @UA-cam

My point exactly.

ua-cam.com/video/turwHatMFnQ/v-deo.html full series symbols and immediate experience.

Huxley is definitively wrong in the first 10-20 minutes when he's talking about language enabling humans to hold concepts in our mind, unlike animals. His statement is contingent upon the belief that all humans have an "inner voice" (that voice in your head that you hear when you think to yourself). This inner voice uses language to narrate your thoughts and decisions, so Huxley deduces this is the feature of human cognition that allows for higher thinking. But this is definitively incorrect. There are many humans without an inner voice. Just google "no inner voice" or "no inner monologue" and you'll see articles and videos with people lacking an inner voice sharing what their subjective experience of thought is. To them, if they had a banana in front of them and a stick behind them, despite the absence of language in their thoughts, they would still be able to hold the concepts of "banana" and "stick" in their mind simultaneously and use the stick to get the banana. It's not language that makes the human capable of this while the chimpanzee is not. It's a deeper capacity to represent objects as symbols in the mind. People with an inner voice use words as those symbols. But people without an inner voice use images, or the concept just kind of "exists" in their mind without any words or images at all. Language is undoubtedly an extremely important feature of human evolution, but it is not the sole feature that enables our higher thinking or consciousness.

Ngl Huxley was kinda hot

The measure of the swing to the right, Is the measure of the swing to the left; Rhythm compensates

Wow

AN ORGANIZED SYSTEM OF ABSREACTIONS

SO MUCH DEPENDS UPON A RED WHEEL BARREL, GLAZED WITH RAIN WATER BESIDE THE WHITE CHICKENS

A ROSE IS A ROSE S A ROSE

THE TAO THAT IS SPOKEN OF IS NOT THE TAO

LANGUAGE MEZMERIZES

Highly intellectual and still not bright enough to comprehend the nuances of a microphone. 🙄

Thank you for posting this!

This guy is delusional. .one second he says "words limit thought " then he says " words distinguish men from bruts" so bruts don't think? And if they do think instead of talk wouldn't their (bruts)thoughts be stronger than the talker?

language is "thought". language is always changing but NEVER EVOLVING!

whoa....

Is this part in a series of interconnected lectures, or was he just referring to planned "later lectures"? I mean to ask: what comes after this one, if any?

Are there more audio recordings or transcripts of this series of lectures?

The key name vs form problematic view of lingo, problematical in the sense that the linguist in general is unable to clearly specify what symbol could represent what form. The original prehistoric language seems to have been rather onomatopoeic so that the sacred syllable of the Vedas tautological as it may be points to a human origination of understanding.

A Huxley deeply involved in MKUltra . With his brother and antecedents committed to eugenics ( J Huxley- UNESCO-Agenda 21 a continuum ) , and the foundation of Darwinism . Gnostic Media , Jan Irvin , a lot of material there .

the world is a stage and this is only a test .

im pretty sure these extremely intelligent beings function is to test the the human beings spirit . my opinion and gut feeling.

On. Aldus. Huxley. Read. Sid. Hartha. By. Allan. What's. The. Mystical. Experience. Is. Never. Limited. Lasha

Thank you making this 1961 talk available. :)

Society, and especially the Victorian society of Modern WASP America has/have always been afraid of intellectuals. William James Sidis, Tesla, two geniuses almost eradicated from history by society and corporate America. The power elite don't like people who understand how Rothschild and the Fed are fucking the planet over from the inside out. Long live the revolution.

Seems like you had a nice girlfriend. I think most people do understand this deeper level but only subconsciously and you can see them unknowingly acting upon this knowledge, but I guess you figured it out on a conscious level.

I used to have a girlfriend who said very little. People always commented on how quiet she was. I found that interesting as what she did say was important. Someone that talks to much is never really listened to much. But, although she never said much I always knew what she wanted or felt. There is a deeper level of communication than language. Most people just can't hear past themselves to find out!

Thank you!

great vid.

That is because humanity has foolishly accepted the inane concept that intelligence is something to be ashamed of. Many of us were harassed for being bright youths, so of course things have changed. Plus people are afraid of elitism, which is ignorance for their are many who are simply on a whole other level. Lets face it, most of humanity is not that intelligent, and yes things like the myth of race and class have led to the education that is possible today. This does not negate idiocy in many.

Intellectualism sure has declined, or at least isn't publicized anymore.

1961 :)

Do you know what year this was?

@BEAUTIFULSORROWw what are your thoughts on language??

@tonyfalca :)

@tonyfalca language appears to serve a purpose, although well never be sure, for sure... lol. that probably sounds silly.

thanks! linguistic determinism is quite an intriguing topic. it seems to me as if language and the ideas it represents are pretty much interchangeable, even interconnected on a much deeper level than many people suppose; i mean, what is one without the other? as he mentioned, its very important to note that language conceals thought, yet reveals thought too. language appears to be alive, without some beginning (or end). language seems redundant the more i think about it.