Відео

Svängteorin?

Just more Leftist claptrap. How tiresome.

“if”….

Jag önskar att Fri tanke skulle vara bättre faktiskt. Naturvetenskapen får stå tillbaka för fantasier.

The Swedish guy sounds like Hans Blix.

Ja, vetenskapen har, till stor del, blivit meningslös pga WOKE, PK, värdegrund, genusperspektiv och liknande politiskt styre av vetenskapen. Vilket bevisas av att endast Mats vågar skrapa lite på den ytan. Nepotismen inom universitetsvärlden tas heller inte upp.

Det enda stressmomenten i mitt liv har varit Christian och hans familj. Akta er för den här snubben.

is that my granny?

Två slanka kvinnor och två män med gravidmage - postmodernism eller post-postmodernism?

Everything has consciousness or it could not exist.

MYCKET bra! 👏👏Ni tar allihopa upp den absoluta kärnpunkten i dagens världsproblem: Det psykologiska, det infantila auktoritetsdyrkandet som har varit Homo Sapiens stora problem i tusentals år. Grovt sagt: Same sh*t, but different toilets.

Amazingly good.

Jag tycker inte att folk ska komma till denna punkt. men jag är också emot att tvinga människor att leva för andras skull. istället för att stoppa det borde folk få hjälp till en fredlig utgång. det är oetiskt att tvinga en person att leva för en annans perspektiv på vad livet betyder

Hur kan ni ha andliga samtal med några som tillsynes inte på nått sätt har erfarenhet av det övernaturliga i den kristna tron ? Har dom vart med om att förmedla helande ? talar dom i tungor ? hjälp någon till frihet från demoner? ande bedömningens gåva ? profetians gåva? mm

does science explain any part of the question of whether a person (embryonic) can possibly have had a choice in conception or being born or being the fastest swimmer as a spermatozoa, or the best finder of the egg … ? If we did have a choice, it means that we chose to be born, perhaps by default to the particular parents to whom we became conceived.

Mer ulf mindre piano för fan

Korrupt? *Grov korruption innebär att statens högt uppsatta talespersoner stör den politiska ordningen (exempelvis med uppgjorda val), och måttligare korruption är att statens tjänstemän på mera vardaglig basis skor sig personligen på obefogade sätt genom sin ställning. Politisk korruption är att manipulera politiken, samhällsinstitutioner och tillvägagångssätt för att kvarbli vid makten, tillförskaffa sig ekonomiska vinningar eller förmåner och kvarhålla eller öka sin status, vare sig genom handling eller underlåtelse av handling, i det offentliga eller privata, och vare sig av individer eller organisationer. Ordet korruption kommer från latin corruptio som betyder ’fördärvat tillstånd’, ’förfall’ eller ’bestickning’ (*källa: Wikipedia).

Jag tycker att folket bör överväga en ny stat med domstol för att utreda om Högsta domstolen med privatägd lagbok och i samförstånd med statschef (kung), riksmarskalk, talman, riksdag, och regering, medvetet och avsiktligt har lurat folket på makten juridiskt med undanhållande om var full immunitet, personlig och funktionell immunitet bygger på (juridiskt, straffrättslig immunitet) och avsikten med påvens immunitet och religion i Sverige. Moderata samlingspartiet kan vara ett medvetet vilseledande partinamn med att alla partier tillhör partiet, då nuvarande politisk demokrati och socialism endast kan handla om att gå mer mot mitten, t ex. Socialdemokraterna eller mer mot vänster, t ex Vänsterpartiet. Vidare tycker jag att folket lånar kungens pengar och även mot bankränta (korruption).

I just noticed at 1:48 how Anna has a little bit of a strange accent. Something about the R sound being more of a tounge-tip R than the typical "american-like" R sound of Stockholm. (Christer Fluglesang, the astronaut has that typical Stockholm accent.) Then I realized, she has a Spanish accent! Not an accent as much as "slightly influenced pronunciation", but still. Cute.

A colllection of individuals Walked into Trump Tower. If only Olympe de Gouges could see Margaret Thatcher for who she is now.

Light has mass. Deal with it.

Why is she so funny and ingenious?

The Godel cult infests all mathematical academia, you can lose your job if you challenge it, that's why most papers that praise this Godellian fools errand only get published.

Intressant. Ellervik är sansad, Karolina så kunnig och Anders klok

Why was the lady so combative?

It took billions of years for consciousness to become this sophisticated.

Ruck skriver medelmåttiga böcker om sina egna problem. Inte värt att lyssna honom eftersom han ljuger och hittar på saker. Svara

fan vilka rövhål hahahaha

Too bad she's married/ I'm sure many men would like to study her anatomy. 😁

Brown Anthony Anderson Robert Williams Eric

Robinson Jose Walker Anna Martin Michelle

När Joel säger om Gud att han finns överallt men vi vill inte se så rullade jag ögonen så hårt att de fastande en stund. Seriöst så urbota dumt att tro så. ”Se på träden” argument är ju bortom barnsligt platta och naiva. Trodde han var smartare än så

At 49:25 your missing a negative sign or you switched the V and V' in your diagram. As expressed it equates an increase in order to an increase in entropy. I enjoyed reading your work on Cognitive Neuroscience. It tuned me in to how much of a blithering idiot I am by virtue of valuing my experiences as reality. It helped me in my work on Ontological Quantum Mechanics.

Sveriges motsvarighet till debatten mellan Chomsky och Foucault.

Voice is not clear , captions wpuld have been helpfull

4:58 Russell's theory of types was not devised to prevent self-reference but circularity. It was perfectly compatible with (non-strict) self-reference (like the one in "this sentence has five words") and this Gödel made clear with his famous formula.

"artificiellt liv" 😦

The proof fails because "the integer g is not the number of a theorem" is a mis-reading of "the numeral g is not the number of a theorem", the latter being simple and self-evident. Numbers or integers are not transferable between applications but are generated in their application. A "transferred number" is a numeral, a tag. Mathematical symbols are not demonstrative - they are not tags, they cannot refer.

Descartes ??? This presentes is an idiot he dors nt know the Arabs discovered Algebra

Taylor Edward Martinez Richard Anderson Brenda

Väldigt spännande diskussion! 👍

@7:25 It was interesting to see such a meaning of the "twittel" sign (negativity). I always thought it like some kind of approximation and always used in that sense. I found online the following FYI from Wikipedia regarding the tilde (~) I think most people use ~ just one, because it is available on the keyboard. This symbol (in English) informally means "approximately", "about", or "around", such as "~30 minutes before", meaning "approximately 30 minutes before". It can mean "similar to", including "of the same order of magnitude as", such as: "x ~ y" meaning that x and y are of the same order of magnitude. Another approximation symbol is the double-tilde ≈, meaning "approximately equal to", the critical difference being the subjective level of accuracy: ≈ indicates a value which can be considered functionally equivalent for a calculation within an acceptable degree of error, whereas ~ is usually used to indicate a larger, possibly significant, degree of error. The tilde is also used to indicate "equal to" or "approximately equal to" by placing it over the "=" symbol, like so: ≅. Are there certain branches of mathematics, where it is used as a negativity sign, and where it is used as an approximation sign? I would appreciate any opinions on this matter. thank you for the great film and outstanding lecture.

Excellent presentation

“Religion in Europe has receded”. Islam would beg to differ old boy.

Why do we accept that both P and ~P can't be simultaneously True? And what evidence would convince someone that (P and ~P) is False in ALL CASES? Not all cases I can show you. But all POSSIBLE cases? Or how about N + 0 = N? How do we know that's ALWAYS True without trying every possible case (which could never be finished)? Or of course, the famous "Two parallel lines never meet." Some of these just seem intuitively obvious to the learned observer, or IOLO as we jokingly called it.

Brown Christopher Young Ronald Lopez George

Islam is the answers! Might feel strange because it may come from another people, but it is a simple theology that just makes sense. One creator.

Mycket intressant diskussion. Problemen kring medvetandet, livet o AI skulle förbättras om deltagarna insåg att tortyr är det centrala fenomenet i Universum. Vanligt är att debattörer är existentiellt naiva och inte fattat de problematiska sidorna i Uni. Mycket likt hur kristna ser på U. Hur ska man tortera en AI?

It's becoming clear that with all the brain and consciousness theories out there, the proof will be in the pudding. By this I mean, can any particular theory be used to create a human adult level conscious machine. My bet is on the late Gerald Edelman's Extended Theory of Neuronal Group Selection. The lead group in robotics based on this theory is the Neurorobotics Lab at UC at Irvine. Dr. Edelman distinguished between primary consciousness, which came first in evolution, and that humans share with other conscious animals, and higher order consciousness, which came to only humans with the acquisition of language. A machine with only primary consciousness will probably have to come first. What I find special about the TNGS is the Darwin series of automata created at the Neurosciences Institute by Dr. Edelman and his colleagues in the 1990's and 2000's. These machines perform in the real world, not in a restricted simulated world, and display convincing physical behavior indicative of higher psychological functions necessary for consciousness, such as perceptual categorization, memory, and learning. They are based on realistic models of the parts of the biological brain that the theory claims subserve these functions. The extended TNGS allows for the emergence of consciousness based only on further evolutionary development of the brain areas responsible for these functions, in a parsimonious way. No other research I've encountered is anywhere near as convincing. I post because on almost every video and article about the brain and consciousness that I encounter, the attitude seems to be that we still know next to nothing about how the brain and consciousness work; that there's lots of data but no unifying theory. I believe the extended TNGS is that theory. My motivation is to keep that theory in front of the public. And obviously, I consider it the route to a truly conscious machine, primary and higher-order. My advice to people who want to create a conscious machine is to seriously ground themselves in the extended TNGS and the Darwin automata first, and proceed from there, by applying to Jeff Krichmar's lab at UC Irvine, possibly. Dr. Edelman's roadmap to a conscious machine is at arxiv.org/abs/2105.10461

Ingvar förnekar att hen själv är en opportunistisk sensor. Det finns ingen annan vetenskaplig förklaring av hjärnan. Se James Giordano.