Відео

You can do the same thing with honeycomb

I just got the attachment set up for tow over the weekend. Supposed to be dry most of this week, so will try to run the full yard and share results! Will be aerating, as well! The tow hitch height is a little low for dethatching, but I need to throw some seed down anyway!

What does it do

Only using the top level ironing between objects in order to get the PLA to play nice. The PETG did stick quite a bit more, but only had one corner of two tiles that were really fused together to the point of trouble.

@@SwftSlntDdly03 thanks for sharing

kannste build plate voll drucken bis kein platz mehr ist und danach trennen

A layer of another material like petg.

@@lynxxlynxx Awesome idea! Is it hard to remove the seperation layer or do you even bother? This has huge potentional you should share with the whole class!😜

@@christopherlarime4095petg doesnt stick well to pla, but sticks well enough to work as a support and vice versa Few other material combos work too

In that instance, it was using the pre-stacked print from Multiboard.io which has top layer ironing turned on, and that's it. That was with a PLA, which is why it was so smooth without needing additional fiddling. The PETG print I did later with 8 tiles did ok, but the bottom two layers were a bear to get separated. If you do a single layer of different material between, it is very clean. Overall, the speed of printing a single tile is faster for me by unit, so this is more for leaving a print running overnight instead.

​@@SwftSlntDdly03I want to accomplish a stacked print with PETG but I had the stack keychain test print and those two stacked objects were a bear to get separated, required a nail and hammer. How do you quickly insert another material layer like PLA between the PETG stacks?

yep, been doing this with gridfinity, it works fantastic. ]

yes me too, this is more like a Toy， designed by group of student

I believe so, easily, yes. You can have it run as snow first starts falling if you're worried about snow type or accumulation. I'm sure different types of wet snow and such may have a little more effort for it involved than what we just had, but it seemed to do well when it would get 'hung up' on something and spin, to then slightly readjust of its own accord and try again. Most issues I had initially were just dialing in the settings for minimum auger height on pathways to travel to the driveway by passing through my yard. Broke a few shear pins that way. I also kept it away from the road initially for automation, but may expand that barrier a little further now that I've seen it work on auto for a bit.

I've gone through quite a few thus far, unfortunately! 😅 Need to dial in some settings, but really need a few more options when it comes to pathways based on where I have my docking station set up! Hope you get taken care of quick!

I don't get large quantities of snow at once in my area generally, but will continue to update as I get to test things with it! My yard is quite a challenge, so I have been tinkering with settings in an attempt to optimize its travel path between zones. Got a few inches of snow last night that I was able to give it some tests on and get some snippets of video up!

I can understand your feeling behind it. I've had a Worx Landroid since 2019 which has freed up my Saturdays from mowing for years now. I get to use that free time and money saved for other things. I also like gadgets, and promoting attempts at growing technology. So I get enjoyment out of it either way. But 100% get not wanting to deal with the hassle they can be, or weighing the benefits vs. cost on your own setup! The cost now vs. what was on kickstarter is MUCH higher as of now, so It wouldn't be viable even for me at that cost!

What’s the name of your lawn mowing company? Also what brand calculator do you use?

@@ccf310 I use my brain, you should try it. My yard at most needs mowed once a week for 24 weeks. At $40 a week for 24 weeks, that’s $960 a year. 10 years that only $9,600, which is a $399 saving over the $9,999 price of the mower 3-1 that only has a 2 year warranty. A kid offers me $20 to do my chores, that’s only $24,000 over 100 years, I’ll be generous and say the mower 3-1 will outlive its 2 year warranty and it’ll last 5 years. In 10 years that means he’ll have to have purchased 2, bringing it to 20,000. Considering the upkeep of the unit, it’s pretty generous to say that in those 10 years it’ll need atleast 4k in repairs, bringing that estimate to 24,000. So again. I’d rather pay a company for 10 years, or a kid down the road for 100 years 🤣.

Wow that is an excessively long explanation about how hurt you are that there are robotic lawn mowers in the world now, you seem to like a real long drawn out response so let’s get to it. I guess you’re right I should use my brain. I know my lawn at most needs (to be), see used my brain there, mowed (a) minimum of once a week unless it is unusually dry. This past year was average for the amount of mowing that needed (to be), brain thing again, mowed which i spent about $400.00 just in gas alone for running the mower, so over ten years that’s $4000.00, but you probably got that, math seems to be your strong point. I paid $3399.00 for my Yarbo on Kickstarter, mainly to alleviate, hopefully some of the 3 hours, minimum, a week i spend mowing the lawn. More numbers here, your specialty. I bought my first Xmark new with a Briggs and Stratton that only lasted 400 hours for $6000.00, bought a used Exmark with a liquid cooled Kawasaki for $3000.00. This does not include any money that it cost for the Simplicity and Yard man tractors before the Exmark’s, or for belts, filters, oil, blades, ignition coils, batteries, trickle chargers etc… to keep them working, excludes labor, even without using my brain I can fix them, what a crazy world right. It would cost me a minimum of $150.00 a week to have it professionally mowed, I will leave the math up to you on that one. Hope this helps you wrap your head around why someone would do something this stupid, well it probably makes sense to you now but with me not using my brain and all, well you know. P.S. Send me the info for the kid who offers $20 to do your chores, maybe he’s better at numbers too. That might change my mind.

@@ccf310 wow took you a month to come up with that? 🤣 say less, you’re embarrassing yourself.

Same! Not sure if we'll get enough snow this year to really put it through its paces, but will definitely update with what we see!

Right!? The structural salvage addition is way too basic to really call a gameplay loop at the moment. The QoL updates saved this one, for sure. Hoping they expand on the fragmentation complexity especially, and require further breaking down of those large chunks before just turning them into magic dust. 🤣

star citizen

Star Citizen, goes from majestic to menacing in mere moments! 😄

Seems reasonable! That's a tough one when so many mission have somewhat random spawn locations, though! Ha!

Problem is not every missions tells you where to go before you accept it

@@Fuar11 Yeah! That's the spicy part lol and at time doesn't work even if you know where you're going

Emilio Oof read the title

Yes, using SteamVR. I have a Rift S, as well, which is why I originally bought Skyrim VR, just decided to try it out on Quest, too. I'd had a lot of issues with ALVR and Riftcat.. And the ability to swap back and forth between Desktop and VR with Virtual Desktop was fantastic. The first time I tried SkyrimVR with Virtual Desktop, the controller thumbsticks didn't work at all, which meant I couldn't do much... but after I saw Virtual Desktop on Quest had an update a few days later, I tried again and it all worked like a charm with no issues during my testing of a few games..

The quality was alright, though not nearly as clear as in the video. However, my 5Ghz router is on the other side of the house. I used the default settings in the Virtual Desktop app, and have a mid-tier gaming PC with a Nvidia 1070ti. I also tried a bit of Onward and Trover, and think if my router didn't have so many walls to go through it would be a great option for when you don't want a wire. Looks like we'll have to sideload an apk now, though.

@@SwftSlntDdly03 yes, sad