Відео

you need to use the Multidodge mutator to have the dodges with no pause inbetween to move like I did in this video. Without multidodge then yes you get a second or so in between dodges

How does vibration create movement. It is the sound or photon that is moving. No sound no vibration. Thrust is the only movement. Momentum comes from thrust. Spinning comes from thrust and friction. All mass and matter spin due to friction. Friction comes from momentum against the outer barrier of that which is moving. A ball spins from throwing it in an atmosphere. The atmosphere creates friction. The outside of the universe cause friction as the universe moves. The universe moves from one day into the other. From today into tomorrow. From yesterday into today.

@@rafaelgonzalez4175 by striking something with a clapper for example can make a bell ring its one of the earliest produced movements done with electricity in man kinds history. You can also make a heavy rod or piece of metal that is hanging freely to rotate or vibrate, none of these require thrust. Thrust is usually only required to make a change in velocity compare to other traveling objects...

@TheZafootz you do realize by striking you are in fact using momentum to generate force. Wind creates momentum. Are you hanging the rod in a vacuum chamber? Because in and hovering over the surface of the earth is in an atmosphere that has wind.

@@rafaelgonzalez4175 The way I see it is if something is changing position from a location they were just at, then that is movement and something that vibrates as a whole is doing just that moveing from one prosition to another back n forth. And yes all momentum has to come from somewhere if not by ones own actions then it is with some artificial action done by the operator. In this case I'm referring to things that are artificially made to vibrate everything else in nature that vibrates is done so by an unbalance of natural forces like earthquakes or sudden release of preassure of something holding back these forces. And to conclude the study of movement as a universal whole then all natrual and artificial movements must be considered in the study.... what you are refering to is the study of the energy behind the movement and thats different then studying movement only especially when artiificial movement differs somewhat from natural movement. I dont see any natural electric motors or gas powered engines in nature so it differs to natures movements done naturally and thats what I am studying...

@TheZafootz Natural movement vrs artificial movement? Where does the idiocy come from. What is artificial? Movement certainly is not. Anything that moves whether it was engineered or imagined still has to follow thrust. Something can not just move artificially or otherwise. Keep capitalism alive and waste your money on artificial thinking.

I'm sharing a theory of mine on youtube how is this teaching? If this was misinformation, wouldn't there be some text below my video telling what the real information is? If anything that I state is incorrect then there's nothing to worry about because the "facts" would be out there for everyone to look up. As far as sharing a theory on youtube goes I dont see anything wrong with that. Its these kinds of comments that only come around when the main accepted ideas are seen as wrong and that is what these people are reacting to. The real facts are that there is something fundamentally wrong with quantum mechanics and instead of looking back to check the fundamentals of quantum mechanics to see where something might of gone wrong, you choose to block out and insult any new idea put forth as if quantum mechanics was already accepted as true facts. Even Planck said himself that the results he got was just good guess work. So even he accepted that fact that his ideas could be wrong as well as do I with my ideas but never would I not accept any new idea just because its different from what is widely accepted today. Widely accepted ideas does not make them true facts and this has happened time and time again with Galileo and Copernicus as well as others. If quantum mechanics was proven to be true unquestionable facts then there would be no need to put forth any ideas such as this but because that is mostly just theory and guess work as well I see no reason not to question it.

I agree with paul. He's just sharing his theory and thinking. And as such. Not stating anything as facts or anything.

Knowing the alphabet and learning how to speak doesn’t mean you should always speak your “opinion.”🤔😏🤷🏻‍♂️😂

@@user-tt8dw6fl2u So who told you you should just now?

@@user-tt8dw6fl2u Using peoples guess work and claiming they are quantum physics facts shouldnt be spoken about yet it still is. Reading from a text book that shares only what is allowed to be published because of financial blocking of anyone elses idea does not make them facts either. Making fun of what I share doesn't change the possibility that it could be correct no matter how you think or feel about the topic. I'd rather know the alphabet correctly then learn quantum gibberish that claims to know everything where overall its guess work and not proven facts, thats why its called quantum "Theory" and not quantum "facts".

no worries thank you for all the kind words on my video

its how I got the videos when i downloaded them years ago before they became unavailable.. Sorry its the only copies I got.....

hahaha

for real xd

Have you not seen 2 people with bad hold cards try to bluff each other before? This hand plays out very similar to a hand such as that, if 2 players in a cash game try to bluff each other with bad hold cards and they both dont care about losing their stacks then that had would play out just about the same as this one. Maybe you need to watch some more poker hands with players holding bad cards because I seen plenty of them......

@@TheZafootz Please explain to me how she was trying to bluff garret when all she did was call? I would love to hear this one.

If she was getting a message to call his all in then how would who ever is sending her that message know what the 2 river cards are going to be? If there was someone hiding in the background sending her a private message telling her that Garret only has 8 high and to call, how would they know that garret wouldn't make is flush, straight, or his straight flush he has a draw for? Theres no possible way that even if she had some private message from someone telling her what his hold cards are that they would know what the river card is going to be, plus they ran it twice what it they only ran it once? Garret likes to run the community cards for the hand 1 time the majority of the time so how would they secret messenger know what cards are coming? If they ran it twice or not? Or know what Garrets reaction was going to be to losing to Jack high? There was too many possibilities for her to lose to have been told to call his all in and be guaranteed to win she had a huge chance of losing the hand by calling the all in she just happen to get "LUCKY" and Garret missed is cards he needed to make his hand, and that is POKER. Happens more often then you think just normally not with high cards only....

are you nuts? There is zero doubt he was cheated.

@@timothyburke6949 Her body language during the river cards shows her uncertainty that she won the hand or not. When someone says "Turn em over" after the 1st river card she doesn't want to show her hand and wants to see Garrets hand 1st because she called him so he must show his cards 1st. Only after she sees that hes got 8 high does she then show her cards, I'm sure if she had lost the hand then she would have mucked her hand without showing her cards. Also why would she say out loud "I think he has me beat" or "You have it?" to Garret with uncertainty in her body language if she knew what he had? Unless shes very good at acting uncertain on live camera then the way shes expressing herself during and right after the hand is genuine and no cheating was involved. If there is no doubt she cheated then there should be some sort of evidence and there is none....

She had no explanation on why she called ..no one would ever imagine J high is good here. Your analysis is absolute garbage.

Then please tell me what is the 100% correct analysis? Oh wait you're a nobody so theres nothing I need to know from you.

@@TheZafootz Hero callers don't give the hmoney back. Cheaters do. Hero callers have some reason to their call that makes sense, she doesn't. Night and day cheat.

@@jamesosullivan7969 You're repeating what the players said in the video but have you seen any proof?

She’s was dating someone on the show.. it’s pretty obvious she’s getting RTA but someone who has access to real time card cameras. She was cheating 100%

When I 1st saw the documentary that showed these buildings that were destroyed after these world fairs was very heart breaking. To me it seemed like there was some part of our history that was erased and taken from us and we will never be able to recover not only the beauty of these structures, but the history of how they came to be will forever be lost to time. Another thing that concerns me is that the buildings that were built to be so called "Insaine Asylums" also have this same look as these buildings in this documentary that were destroyed. When I look up more of these asylums around the world they all look like huge mansions or castle like buildings that looked like Hotels or multiple family estates that to hide their history was taken by force from the occupants and turned into these Asylums. Everyone of those buildings looks like they were built for royalty and yet we are told they were built to imprison and treat insane people. If you look at a State Prison for example that we are also told were built to imprison criminals those structures do look like they were built to cage and imprison people. These Asylums do not , they look like huge castle like mansions that were built to become luxury hotels or something. Some look like they could of been 4 or 5 star hotels and yet they house the insane people to protect them from themselves and from the public. This Also sounds like some sort of cover up so no one will know the history of these buildings and why they were built. Telling me these huge beautiful buildings were built just to house the insane people dont seem trueful to me, They were there for another reason I hunch not for crazy people only thats some sort of cover for what they really were for...

This is a crude instruction video as to the basic way the bug zapper works that I made a video of prior to this one. Its not a blueprint on how to make a perfectly good/safe 10kv bug zapper and this is why I state in this video that I am not responsible for anyone who hurts or damages themselves or someone else by influence from this video. This is a the basic way as to how a high voltage bug zapper works. Not a build your own perfectly safe bug zapper only how to wire the cages so people can understand how the wiring goes to get it to operate. As for their own safety they will need to provide that to whatever they want to construct on their own. This video just provides how to wire it this was not intended to be a perfectly safe way to construct a bug zapper only to clearly show how one is hooked up to operate...... So like the person that made this comment Do NOT build a zapper in this fashion find a safer way to build it.

It’s to mock persson

I think without the table talk he doesn’t fold

I mean, obviously subtle cues based on the way people talk, the things they say, the way they react to certain things in conversation are all tools that help a good salesman, or con-man to swindle a person - i think the same logic applies here. Eric had no-idea what Daniel was holding until the _"...A3 off?"_ comment. That definitely factored into Daniel's fold here. If Perssons hadn't implied that a J was no good, I don't think Daniel lays it down 🤷🏼‍♂️ Something else that I think you have to take into account is Daniel's reading ability, & his tendency to trust his gut vs probability. I think he convinced himself that there were only a couple hands Eric would play this way; a weak ace being 1 of them (the other being complete air). W/all that in mind i feel as if there's definitely some merit to what OP is picking up on/highlighting here, & I have to admit, I missed the _"...A3 off?"_ comment from Daniel when I originally watched this match.

Outstanding! I've seen most of those patents before except the 2 phase output into the 8 coils that form 3 alternating poles.... As for the text I have never seen before and if those are truly Mr. Teslas words then no doubt this is the self power generator that uses these details in those patents....

@@TheZafootz Self power, interesting. Got any more links to add substance. The only way this could be self sustaining is if it is extracting energy from the earth's magnetic field or by scraping some very high level exacerbation of zero point energy.

@@hypothalamusjellolap8177 Okay Maybe I should of said "Self-Exciting" instead of self powering. Self powering sounds like a generator that's providing is own torque to electrify mechanical loads. And as we all know that mechanical torque to turn a generator has to come from somewhere, especially when you start plugging in loads to it to power things....

@@TheZafootz Yup, thanks for updating. I was just wondering. There are alot of valid sources of energy we aren't using yet so I was wondering if someone stumbled upon a high level extraction for a very low level interaction yet to be or impossible to observe. Like efficient neutrino harvesting or farming of an anomaly in nuclear bonds that occurs when the key conditions are applied. Like a looping oscillation in nuclear bond polarity that would result in a changing magnetic field which is captured from the planets gravity cycle through the cosmos as we are constantly moving through changing gravity fields in the medium of space. Our coordinates are only relative to the sun.

@@hypothalamusjellolap8177 I do think there is a way to tap energy from the radiation come down from space. We hear it as static on the radio and white static on an old tube TV set. This static and white ouse is energy raining down from the sky turning that into usable work is maybe possible but highly unlikely. ...