Відео

what is the harvester model? Is this suitable for seed sorghum harvesting application?

4:00 11:00

First! Also, congratulations for the work😎💪

Also, it is incorrect to state that e-truck cost is prohibitively high. The ROI on the Tesla semi is about 2 years and charging is about 1.5 hours. Charging can be done while unloading and/or reloading the trailer.

Electrifying heavy trucks has been solved by the Tesla semi.

Great initiative!

Jessika Trancik. I read today's NPR column on EVs. Do you live in the real world where people don't have the time to check the environmental impact of every manufacturing process? Why don't you just stay in your cubicle at MIT and study it quietly. You just drove me into that "I don't want to buy an EV camp" by your attitude. Sincerely, William A Perrow MT ASCP (retired); specialty - Clinical Chemistry.

what about birds eating the seeds?

that's my dad!

3:39 Separating before it gets there 👏👏

2:18 plastic bales don’t cause microplastic runoff when they sit out on the parking lot. Babies haven’t had any microplastic found in their poops either!!!

0:59 100% recycleable 😂😂😂 let’s see your off falls!

Très important

GO LIZ!! 🥹❤️

Very cool! Would love to drive one of these!

China maintained coal plants to stabilise the grid and is now ready to move across to a mix of nuclear, on which they have expended a lot of research, and other alternative power sources. They have been methodical and strategic.

co2 has nothing to do the temperature.

Koonin is the voice of reason in the climate discussion.

A thing of beauty 🙂

You would think that someone supposedly as intelligent about climate and statistics as Mr Hansen would know that you can’t use bell curves on multi variable complex systems. This man is an embarrassment to climate science and has entirely to much influence. We are in trouble especially if we have someone like Mr. Hansen misrepresenting climate information.

7 years past, where is that phase change material?

And missing 5 years. When do climate scientists talk about CO2 resulting from unnecessary manufacturing due to PLANNED OBSOLESCENCE? Ask an economist about the annual depreciation of durable consumer goods since Sputnik. What is Net Domestic Product?

Market this, market that... A good place to start is Nate Hagen's (The Great Simplification) which is an aggregation of expertise in an array of sciences and professions. It is an effort to gain a macro understanding of all of the existential threats that are coming to a singularity in our lifetimes. And Daniel Schmachtenberger systems based understanding of objective reality are the best places to start to look for solutions. Global overshoot is the at the core of our problems. The Market is not going to get us out of this mess.

this is beautiful , take it easy-🖖

Science is never settled! Idiot!

ooooh. " From 2004 to 2009, Koonin was employed by BP " okay, now it makes sense, yes

3:08 laughable. Is he being sarcwstic?

Great job Daphne!

Is it possible to produce ethanol from napier grass

Of the 1,609 scientists who have signed the declaration, two signatories are Nobel Prize laureates. The most recent to sign is Nobel Prize winner Dr. John F. Clauser, winner of the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics. In an announcement from CLINTEL, Clauser is quoted as saying “Misguided climate science has metastasized into massive shock-journalistic pseudoscience. In turn, the pseudoscience has become a scapegoat for a wide variety of other unrelated ills. It has been promoted and extended by similarly misguided business marketing agents, politicians, journalists, government agencies, and environmentalists.”

Game changer !!!!! 💪💪💪

My best friend, Great video. Love your channel. Keep up the excellent work!!! Wonderful upload! Keep it up! +thumb up3!

I did not watch this when the host stated CO2 is the most important green house gas. That is wrong. H20 or Vapor is the most important gas, Co2 is a minor component.

So much bullshhhit ....so little time!!!!

54:00 Much too much is made of the moral hazard of carbon capture. Por dios…we will NOT be burning large amounts of fossil fuels for several decades, even centuries. The economics are increasingly obvious. The Fossil Fuel Age is rapidly drawing to a close. Just see if it doesn't go that way.

47:27 A couple of my favorites are ground source heat pumps and radiative cooling. WRT transportation, I strongly believe in eliminating STROADS. There are benefits in widely different areas, and there are indeed some environmental effects.

46:53 In 2022, solar and wind, together, increased generation, globally, almost as much as all increase in electricity production (513 vs 645 TWh).

When we think about people with polarized opinions on environmental issues, we need to realize that such polarization exists on BOTH ends of the opinion spectrum. Surely you can think of some examples among public figures.

I was trying to really hard to go along with James Hanson on his pro nuclear stance. I’ve been anti-nuclear all my life so that was quite a leap for me. Then he said “let the market and the utilities decide“. That is how we got in this mess in the first place! we let the oil companies who run the market, ruin the planet! Maybe nuclear is OK on a very limited basis since we have to figure out how to store the waste somewhere. Japan right now is trying to dump their waste nuclear water from Fukushima into the ocean. Sorry, Mr. Hanson, nuclear is not a benign technology.

For four years now polo illinois farmers have only grown corn and although I have no proof they seem to have switched to a cheaper crappier seed as of slight less than four years ago because polo has been infested with northern corn rootworm beetles. Before four years ago I've gone over 20 years without even knowing what these things were because I've never seen them. Now every year they are back with greater numbers. These farmers refuse to do crop rotation(I'm guessing they aren't trying to be organic and don't care about pest populations because out of four years I've only seen them plane spray once). Everyone I talk to seem to not even know what northern corn rootworm beetles are. Those things are the most destructive pest I've ever seen. They destroy FAR MORE than just corn so I'm unsure why they are named as they are. They should be named GREEN DEVILS.

I was just wondering how we could cool down the nuclear reactor in power plants if the waters are getting warmer and warmer?

Remember when these types were mostly on the street corners wearing the, "The End is Near" signs? Front and back collecting change in their , End is near, black little buckets. Ah, the good old days. Now the left and academia seeks them out, calls 'em science guys and are paidfor propagandists with our precious tax dollars. You gotta laugh.

Extinction-Level Event The Era of honest scientific studies is dead. It died by political grant. These paid for productions are right up there with the Salem witch climate crisis or don't fall off the earth flat earthers. You'd think being wrong 100% of the time would bring at least a pause , a question, But no....... Shame on you Oddly the cure for what ever flavor of todays climate crisis happens to be is always the same, more taxes , wealth redistribution and liberty lost

ZERO, the number of times these climate proctologist have been predictively correct. Who needs math and science when you can just talk crap. ua-cam.com/video/Cz45fETw078/v-deo.html

ZERO, Co 2 a trace gas, statistically it's amt is so small you'd be correct to say there is none in our atmosphere. The oceans produce nearly all of that trace (0.00036 by vol) Amt. If it were a planet warmer, logic would dictate you'd look there first. But no one looks there at all. Nope it's solely man and cow farts responsible, even though we produce trace amts of the tiny trace amt. What then should become apparent is this ain't about global warming. It's paidfor political propaganda, seeking more taxes, wealth re-distribution and liberties lost. Tipping buckets, heating jars, phoney factoid charts are all war ning signs of the rabid fraud contained in all these political paid for productions. Why would anyone use such presentations like tippy shit, hot jars and these phoney charts? If it's global warming let's compare worlds. One with nearly 100% co2 atmosphere, say Mars . Certainly th is will make warming predictions easy as pie, no need to be wrong 100% of the time, like now. Mars well It's over heated to -80 to -200 on average. Toasty. If were at a " tipping pt " it's we're about to wipe out all plant life by starving them of their life sustaining co2. So that a few politicians have trillions to spend and more control of your life

In the 50s the consensus was of course the ice age was here. The consensus cure was to cover the poles In coal dust. "The evidence in support of these predictions [global cooling] has now begun to accumulate so massively that meteorologists are hard-pressed to keep up with it.” The Cooling World“A study release last month by two NOAA scientists that the amount of sunshine reaching the ground in the continental U.S. diminished by 1.3% between 1964 and 1972.” The Cooling World“Telltale signs are everywhere...the thickness of the pack ice...the southward migration of warmth-loving creatures like the armadillo...” Another Ice Age?“Since the 1940s the mean global temperature has dropped about 2.7 degrees.” Another Ice Age?“The threat of a new ice age must now stand alongside nuclear war as a likely source of wholesale death and misery for mankind,” The Ice Age Cometh!

• “The Earth’s Cooling Climate,” Science News, November 15, 1969.• “Colder Winters Held Dawn of New Ice Age,” Washington Post, January 11, 1970.• “Science: Another Ice Age?” Time Magazine, June 24, 1974.• “The Ice Age Cometh!” Science News, March 1, 1975.• “The Cooling World,” Newsweek, April 28, 1975.• “Scientists Ask Why World Climate is Changing; Major Cooling May Be Ahead,” New York Times, May 21, 1975.• “In the Grip of a New Ice Age?” International Wildlife July-August, 1975.• “A Major Cooling Widely Considered to Be Inevitable,” New York Times, September 14, 1975.• “Variations in the Earth’s Orbit, Pacemaker of the Ice Ages,” Science magazine, December 10, 1976.

i am so grateful that you chose to Share this Knowledge.

What a load of clap-trap, anthropomorphic contributions to climate change is minimal at best, I would suggest all who doubt this to study paleoclimate over the last 12k years, and you will find periods where global temperatures were past the projected 'crisis point' of the current hysteria and you will find that we are still here, the planet is still here. If you want to know what a real climate crisis looks like, check out the Younger Dryas climate disaster which lasted 1.5k years. All climate models are fatally flawed, and are worth crap. To base this world wide hysteria on FLAWED models is lunacy.

I thought it was Trump's election campaign.