GIAN - MHRD, IIT Kharagpur
GIAN - MHRD, IIT Kharagpur
  • 609
  • 467 947

Відео

8. Deleuze on Difference and Repetition (Contd.)
Переглядів 7 тис.4 роки тому
8. Deleuze on Difference and Repetition (Contd.)
10. Deleuze and Guattari's Anti-Oedipus
Переглядів 5 тис.4 роки тому
10. Deleuze and Guattari's Anti-Oedipus
13. Many Levels of Politics
Переглядів 1,7 тис.4 роки тому
13. Many Levels of Politics
14. State Philosophy and the Wes Machine
Переглядів 8274 роки тому
14. State Philosophy and the Wes Machine
5. Deleuze's Reading of Nietzsche (Contd.)
Переглядів 5 тис.4 роки тому
5. Deleuze's Reading of Nietzsche (Contd.)
3. Hegel as background to Deleuze's thought (Contd.)
Переглядів 6 тис.4 роки тому
3. Hegel as background to Deleuze's thought (Contd.)
9. Deleuze on Difference and Repetition (Contd.)
Переглядів 3,2 тис.4 роки тому
9. Deleuze on Difference and Repetition (Contd.)
12. Deleuze and Guattari's Anti - Oedipus (Contd.)
Переглядів 1,9 тис.4 роки тому
12. Deleuze and Guattari's Anti - Oedipus (Contd.)
2. Hegel as background to Deleuze's thought (Contd.)
Переглядів 7 тис.4 роки тому
2. Hegel as background to Deleuze's thought (Contd.)
6. Deleuze's Reading of Nietzsche
Переглядів 3,7 тис.4 роки тому
6. Deleuze's Reading of Nietzsche
4. Deleuze's Reading of Nietzsche
Переглядів 10 тис.4 роки тому
4. Deleuze's Reading of Nietzsche
1. Hegel as background to Deleuze's thought
Переглядів 13 тис.4 роки тому
1. Hegel as background to Deleuze's thought
11. Deleuze and Guattari's Anti-Oedipus (Contd.)
Переглядів 1,4 тис.4 роки тому
11. Deleuze and Guattari's Anti-Oedipus (Contd.)
7. Deleuze on Difference and Repetition
Переглядів 14 тис.4 роки тому
7. Deleuze on Difference and Repetition
30. Aeroelasticity Fluter Analysis Module - I (Contd.)
Переглядів 2814 роки тому
30. Aeroelasticity Fluter Analysis Module - I (Contd.)
14. Attitude Control Using Coulometric Actuators
Переглядів 2394 роки тому
14. Attitude Control Using Coulometric Actuators
13. Attitude Control Using Magneto Torquers
Переглядів 1,1 тис.4 роки тому
13. Attitude Control Using Magneto Torquers
7. Spin Stabilization
Переглядів 4174 роки тому
7. Spin Stabilization
5. Satellite Attitude Stabilization
Переглядів 7064 роки тому
5. Satellite Attitude Stabilization
10. Attitude Control Using Momentum Wheels and Control Moment Gyros
Переглядів 1,2 тис.4 роки тому
10. Attitude Control Using Momentum Wheels and Control Moment Gyros
4. Rigid Body Dynamics
Переглядів 4074 роки тому
4. Rigid Body Dynamics
3. Discussion
Переглядів 3074 роки тому
3. Discussion
2. Rigid Body Dynamics
Переглядів 9544 роки тому
2. Rigid Body Dynamics
1. Rotational Kinematics
Переглядів 3,7 тис.4 роки тому
1. Rotational Kinematics
9. Problem Solving
Переглядів 2014 роки тому
9. Problem Solving
6. Problem Solving
Переглядів 2144 роки тому
6. Problem Solving
26. Aeroelasticity Fluter Analysis Module - I (Contd.)
Переглядів 2634 роки тому
26. Aeroelasticity Fluter Analysis Module - I (Contd.)
11. Attitude Stabilization Using Fluid Rings
Переглядів 1334 роки тому
11. Attitude Stabilization Using Fluid Rings
12. Problem Solving
Переглядів 1664 роки тому
12. Problem Solving

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @RohitChowdhury_sajaysaini
    @RohitChowdhury_sajaysaini Місяць тому

    Which book is this

  • @innocentnsabimana2335
    @innocentnsabimana2335 Місяць тому

    very good lecture

  • @sharrehabibi
    @sharrehabibi Місяць тому

    Great presentation

  • @siddeshsiddesh8771
    @siddeshsiddesh8771 3 місяці тому

    Thank you sir good information

  • @andrebenoit283
    @andrebenoit283 3 місяці тому

    What a brilliant complement to Socrates to be called a Sophist by Plato!

  • @deladzobo1515
    @deladzobo1515 3 місяці тому

    What text books did he use?

  • @tsenotanev
    @tsenotanev 4 місяці тому

    so then.. in deleuze terms .. deleuze is acting as a slave to hegel .. but then why would the slave be saying anything of interest about the master .. he's just acting out his own slavishness and projecting wickedness onto the master.. ... deleuze is just full of performative contradictions like that... like any regular charlatan really..

  • @angelandrescastro3489
    @angelandrescastro3489 5 місяців тому

    Hello, hope you are having a great day.Is there a way for me to get a copy of the notes that were given in this course?

  • @sydneysymposia
    @sydneysymposia 6 місяців тому

    If this lecture proves anything, it's that Hegel is more profound than Deleuze.

    • @LittleCheka
      @LittleCheka 6 місяців тому

      Profundity always tells you more about the subject

    • @sydneysymposia
      @sydneysymposia 6 місяців тому

      @@LittleCheka profundity is the self-explication of the depth of substance which is, admittedly, also subject, so yes ;)

  • @vinivon1
    @vinivon1 8 місяців тому

    Excellent class, very didactic! Thanks for sharing knowledge!!

  • @joaoboechat7637
    @joaoboechat7637 8 місяців тому

    This guy rocks! What's his name?

  • @jstahl76
    @jstahl76 8 місяців тому

    One way to consider oppositional concepts (the dialectic) as compared to positive forces that are not dialectically bound into oppositions: whereas concepts necessarily are dialectically-opposed, SPECIFIC FREQUENCIES are just what they are - positive forces in the fabric of reality. An analysis of brain activity can understand how the two hemispheres set up oppositional types of reality-experience, the actual brainwaves themselves are purely positive phenomena. The Monroe Institute's science of binaural beats is a way to show how hemispheric tendencies of DIFFERENCE (introducing different tones in the different ears) produce an altogether different type of tonal focus. (This may be a "Deluzian" type of technology that accelerates human development - or reveals its potential.) How concepts are made of tonal patterns is a matter that comes into view for understanding by way of exploring nonconceptual zones of experience - for example, the focus on a particular tone free from conceptual fixation. The mind will react with conceptual interpretation - all of which conceptuality is made of polarized oppositions. But the tone is a nonconceptual phenomena, that includes an innate concept (its Specific-Frequency, as known by Hertz measure, etc.).

  • @agnaybakshi3537
    @agnaybakshi3537 10 місяців тому

    what will be the final equation here @41:46

  • @agnaybakshi3537
    @agnaybakshi3537 10 місяців тому

    how would we desaturate without thrusters?

  • @christopherellis2663
    @christopherellis2663 10 місяців тому

    ¿ OFF OF? 😅 ffs! Speak English!

  • @TEAM10Pro
    @TEAM10Pro Рік тому

    More video needed like this , I will watch instead of reels ❤

  • @TEAM10Pro
    @TEAM10Pro Рік тому

    Its very good Please take lecture on Medical device

  • @matthewlunt8831
    @matthewlunt8831 Рік тому

    Copy that!

  • @matthewlunt8831
    @matthewlunt8831 Рік тому

    Holy fuck, are we there yet? Right?

  • @matthewlunt8831
    @matthewlunt8831 Рік тому

    Stop saying right, right!

  • @millicentaffoakoh375
    @millicentaffoakoh375 Рік тому

    Thank you

  • @deladzobo1515
    @deladzobo1515 Рік тому

    This lecture is great. Please what textbook is he using as reference material for his lectures? For example, he mentioned page number 168 @ 38.31 minutes into the video, which text material is the page number in?

  • @MoLaMançao79
    @MoLaMançao79 Рік тому

    I think when he says that the schizophrenia Deleuze and Gattari are discussing is different from the medical diagnosis he is for the most part wrong. I think perhaps he is trying to make the subject more palatable for his students but he is effectively castrating the core of the philosophy. That quanta at a certain point affects qualia, a certain amount of the schizophrenia that capitalism produces and then names will cause that person to be hospitalized by other sufferers. The work is jarring, it’s not exactly a work that is safe, but that is precisely in my opinion why it is an ethically ‘good’ work, and one to be studied and understood, and rigorously applied to our epistemologies, certainly in physics and the health sciences.

  • @mbetobongcharles4346
    @mbetobongcharles4346 Рік тому

    Quite educative. I love it

  • @matthewlunt8831
    @matthewlunt8831 Рік тому

    Please stop saying right right, it's driving me nuts right!

  • @misbahumuhammad2578
    @misbahumuhammad2578 Рік тому

    Thanks

  • @FlorenceO-kn5in
    @FlorenceO-kn5in Рік тому

    This is really an eye opener. Very educative and informative

  • @dusabimanasimon4433
    @dusabimanasimon4433 Рік тому

    excellent course though

  • @sylvesteracheampong1541
    @sylvesteracheampong1541 Рік тому

    Enjoying it now

  • @ambiearchie9956
    @ambiearchie9956 Рік тому

    INFORMATIVE, EXPOSITORY AND EDUCATIVE VIDEO. THANKS

  • @OluwatosinOlogun-be9ie
    @OluwatosinOlogun-be9ie Рік тому

    Good one

  • @tolulopeprecious6561
    @tolulopeprecious6561 Рік тому

    Educative

  • @ignatiusalfredeneche3771
    @ignatiusalfredeneche3771 Рік тому

    Am happy to key in to this

  • @patrickadoga3606
    @patrickadoga3606 Рік тому

    How do I download it into my UA-cam page

  • @MattiaBadiali
    @MattiaBadiali Рік тому

    Hi, I'm a mechanical engineering student from Unifi, (Florence, Italy). I am doing research on these topics and have taken your recorded course. I noticed for some further information it is referred to a book, could you tell me the name? thank you

  • @marcomiranda9476
    @marcomiranda9476 Рік тому

    Thanks

  • @marcomiranda9476
    @marcomiranda9476 Рік тому

    The questions are ruining a great lecture

  • @rangeetsengupta4299
    @rangeetsengupta4299 Рік тому

    he bares himself to convey the Deleuzean event... great lecture

  • @matthewlunt8831
    @matthewlunt8831 Рік тому

    to be honest, it made little sense but I guess there's no time to really strip this down enough to enable the remedial section to grasp what's what first time round. But I would like to add that the previous lecs in this series have been great in this respect!

  • @matthewlunt8831
    @matthewlunt8831 Рік тому

    nice haircut, nice discursive analysis

  • @jm0489
    @jm0489 Рік тому

    40:30

  • @Jfochoaa
    @Jfochoaa Рік тому

    Hello. Thanks for these amazing lectures. I have a question that I appreciate it if someone could help me with. Could someone explain a bit about what he says at 24:40 time? What I get is that nucleation reduces the amount of lagb and covert them into hagb. He also says that strength increases due to the Hall-Petch relation, which makes me think of a grain ( or cell/subgrain) size reduction. My question is, where does that cell size reduction come from during nucleation?

  • @HossamKorin
    @HossamKorin Рік тому

    Hi Dr Park, thank you for the very informative video. I was wondering why you referred to Synchro as a Macroscopic model. I believe it's analysis is purely analytical as opposed to T7F which utilizes Macroscopic models in its analysis and optimization. Can you shed some light on this?

  • @LotannaIloekwe
    @LotannaIloekwe Рік тому

    Pretty good refresher course. Thank you!!!

  • @ornuraisangsawang5975
    @ornuraisangsawang5975 Рік тому

    Smart teaching!

  • @jorgecastillo-od9ri
    @jorgecastillo-od9ri Рік тому

    great lecture!!

  • @LilVukie
    @LilVukie Рік тому

    I emailed Professor Widder about the issue, and he is aware of it, but there is nothing that he can do. He has however recorded a 6 part lecture on Anti-Oedipus for a class that he taught. I've been listening to it, and it is just as good--I would say even better--as the rest of this series. Hopefully, this would be a good substitute for people: ua-cam.com/play/PLQuGsamIQkwqqwaPygwQR43165ZhqEKqR.html

  • @jm0489
    @jm0489 Рік тому

    59:00

  • @doordarshan_0516
    @doordarshan_0516 Рік тому

    Kindly provide book name

  • @doordarshan_0516
    @doordarshan_0516 Рік тому

    What's the book name