Відео

Finally what is the best camera?

Sir can we use ag-ac90 as a Webcam? Please reply sir

Ilove Ac90

Ilove Ac90

Three things! First off, great video! Secondly, what's that song?! And lastly, was your GH2 hacked?

newtonsolutions.nl newtonsolutions.nl/video-film/ newtonsolutions.nl/vormgeving/ newtonsolutions.nl/referenties/

audiovisuele vormgeving | bedrijfsfilms | promotiefilms | registraties | newtonsolutions.nl/filmproductie-videoproductie-bedrijfsfilms-laten-maken/

Why is there that weird effect around the candle fire on the 90? I like the ac90 everywhere except when it shoots lights, I shoot at gigs that there are many lights so this could a deal break for me...

is not fayr....The GH2 with the 14-42 /3,5 lenses?Give a goodiest lenses for GH2!!

Да бред тут полный.У друга Панас 84, вместе снимали концерт. GH2 на порядок круче снял камеры. У камеры голимое мыло было у Гаша стоял 24p, а в камере 50p.

I love the AC90, but I am sooooooo disappointed in its DOF performance :( Definitely not a DVX-100B replacement ...

I want that song!

they're both 3 goods cameras

Good comment.

what are the best setting for a wedding

This is great helpful comparison, good job, thanks.

But bmc 2.5k is the killer m43. Ive sild my red one and pucked up 2 bmc awaiting 4k. Pocket camera is on my test list. Thats the gh killer

I will say poor test ive done this except i know gh123 in n out and 40hrs on ag and pending application gh is a fav. Gh1 hacked for slo mo. Gh 2 hack as a b cam fg3 a cam. I owb a 3ton grip n light truck so i usally light my sets. And in doing so ag doesnt produce the cimena feel as well with gh2 3

Goes to prove that GHx is a cult not a camera.

I think this is one of those comparisons that is a matter of application. Use which ever one meets your needs. The GH3 is more of a multi-purpose hybrid tool. It offers better depth of field control similar to dSLRs, connects well to outboard audio mixers, and shoots great stills. Yet for some things, the AG AC90 is appealing.

If you plan on making money with your choice get the AG AC90 if you plan on wanting nice images and shooting as a hobby go for the GH2/3

GH3 has no flicker problem

GH3 has light flicking problems so far we know its the PAL model. I posted some info on philipbloom DOT> NET under the GH1 & GH2 forums.

Gh2- 600 $ AG-AC90- 1800$

Not good test!!! GH2 and Gh3 - the best!

of course the AC90. Very good camcorder.

With GHx you have an infinite variety of Lens options which gives you limitless options on the type of footage you can take, from anamorphic to macro. From vintage cinema lenses to the latest super sharp primes which will keep coming year after year. Plus you can do stills too with the same camera. In my opinion that's more bang for the buck than a fixed non adaptable system. Unless you need the bulky equipment look for clients?

Thanks for the video, but I wonder: does have the AC90 an external mic jack, such as 2,5 or 3,5 mm jack?

I've been a long time Panny fan since before the DVX100.. got the HMC150 then HMC40 and the GH1 when it came out. I eventually replaced my HMCs for GH2's and now use GH3's but I do miss my easy run and gun HMCs. This looks like a sweet 2nd or 3rd camera option. I may just get one! Thanks for this helpful video!

I used these cameras in the test, because the price range is quite 'similar'. But it are totally different cameras for different usage. For good flexible video (such as run and gun) the AC90 is much more easier: Steady, good sound and much more. Definitely worth it! If you mostly want to make good pictures/ video images from tripod and sound is not important, I suppose the GH3 wins. But you need (at least 2 lenses.(Fast pancake for example + standard zoom lens)The GH2/ 3 image (DOF, etc) wins.

Should I get a ac90 or a gh3, my only concern with the gh3 is the auto focus and how it performs. The ac90 looks like a semi-pro camcorder, but is it worth the extra cash compared to the less expensive gh3. Another concern of mine is the lens. The one on the ac90 looks great, but what would be a good equivalent one for the gh3 and how much would it cost? My budget is about 1800-2000 so I want to get the most bang for my buck! Thanks

What's with the 6 thumbs down?, any child can push the thumbs down button, but if you are an adult, then make a comment on why you don't like the video or just make a video yourself. BTW, great vid!

I'd put my hacked GH1 against both these cameras. The hack makes it a super sharp video camera but at a price. If you go with the highest quality hack you risk getting error messages with high detail shots such as leaves blowing in the wind. There is a hack that is reliable with less bit rates. I was thinking about getting the Panasonic but have to do more research. Thanks for posting. Both of the cameras in your test excelled in different shots. Hard choice.

Nice video! thanks for taking the time to share this.

that is correct. But personally I prefer to have my image too sharp than too vague. (Making it more vague is not a big deal.) By now I have changed my in camera settings, so it is good for grading: flat image, not too much color, not oversharped etc.

Thanks. I created the music my self (with some samples and stuff)

The auto settings are really good. There is a 'stepless' change, and it is fast and 'fluent'. You can put most things on manual control as well. But as written many times there is no ND filter you can switch on/ off. You can screw a variable ND on the lens. I have one, but to be honest, I haven't used it yet, as it works fine for me as it is. I think there are many reasons to choose the AC90 instead of the older HMC 150. Good luck

Great Video, Thanks. Very informative. Personally, cannot decide between 5D MarkII with all L lenses and real video camera. So far i really like all info and reviews about AG-AC90, looks big value for money...Thanks a lot. Aloha.

This is an excellent informative video. Great comparison job!

what music is this? it's really good! :)

Hi there, have you considered "photo SFX art" (just google it)? On their website you will find a good free video explaining the right way to make amazing photographs. This made it easier for Daniel to create pictures that have a jaw-dropping-effect any time you take a look at them. I hope it works for you also.

GH3 has minimum to none moire and aliasing... GH2 has none from what I know, maybe really fine lines

And in low light, the GH2 and 3 defiinitely still wins in my opinion. It's a great cam for starters, or at least people who are beginning to do freelance work, such as shooting weddings and such.

There's still a long way from AC90 to GH2 and 3 if you plan to do something cinematic with it. It's not just ready for that yet. I don't know what Panasonic's deal is with worse sensors in larger camcorders. It's strange. In bright light it's somewhat better though. But the colors on the GH2 and 3 are superb, especially with the Driftwood hack on. Lots of bang for your buck.

Less than $2000, most video cameras are plastic and it has a built in ND.

It has a built in automatic ND filter. Problem is it works up to certain exposure levels and not well beyond that. You can then screw on a 49mm ND 2, 3, etc. in those very well lit situations.

E SOLAMENTE FANTASTICA

Many thanks for doing this comparison - very well produced. Perhaps you might do a comparison between the AC90 and the GH3 when it comes out?

In some shots the white balance was set different, so I only corrected the color in some shots. Not too much, and no other grading.

Interesting, the GH2 looks awful in comparison to the AC90 however this may be because the AC90 footage looks graded and GH2 does not.