Відео

@@valeriogavioli7581 Grazie mille e buone feste anche a te!😎

I have no price references for the American market.

@@micopero Thank you so much!

Thank you very much, I also use an EQ6-R with my C11 🙂

Grazie mille! 🙂

@@artplus5757 Thanks!🙂

@@valeriogavioli7581 Grazie mille, gentilissimo!😊

Thank you, we look forward to welcoming you to our country.🙂

Thank you so much!🙂

@@WonderfulViews839 Thank you!

Thank you so much!🙂

Thank you so much!🙂

@@valeriogavioli7581 Grazie mille!🙂

@@Eyis Thank you so much!

Thank you su much!

That's just a mountain left behind when the crater was formed. Astroboscuit explained and demonstrated this pretty well.

On the darkside of the moon

Thank you. A Dobson telescope can provide excellent lunar observations. 🙂

@@giorgiomengoli I have uploaded videos taken with my Dobsonion scope to my you tube page. Although I get good results, it can't give the close up details that your scope does.

@@screedy1050 Hi, The quality of your lunar images may be influenced by the aperture of your telescope or your image acquisition process.

@@jackiemcdonell1737 Thank you very much!

@@lotus30com Thank you!

@@liveandletlive8264 Thank you very much!

Thanks!😊

Too small you can't see it !😀😀

Where is the lunar Rover or its tracks? If satellites can read a license plate, then why can’t we find some trace of any moon landings?

@@Jay-mb1ym The minimum sized object that a telescope can resolve, is limited by the diameter of the Objective Lens or of the Primary Mirror of that telescope… & is also affected by the distance of that object, from the telescope that is attempting to view it… Satellite borne cameras or telescopes that are used to view the Earth’s surface, are ORBITING THE EARTH… By making that comparison, you are expecting to see objects the size of a flag or one of the Apollo Lunar Landers, from the distance of the Earth to the Moon… which is approximately 240,000 Miles away… 🤔😳 Currently, even the largest Astronomical Telescopes on Earth, do not possess the resolution required to resolve objects of that size upon the surface of the Moon… However, it is claimed that the NEXT generation of Earth based Astronomical Telescopes, should be capable of resolving such objects… albeit another complication arises, whereby attempting to view such small objects on the Moon, at the higher magnifications required, results in serious optical aberrations resulting from the atmospheric disturbances within our own atmosphere… all of which are increased by the same magnification factor… Lastly… Even if successful images were obtained of the Lunar Landers on the Moon (which would only appear as very tiny & almost indistinct objects in any case…) the hardened skeptics who claim that the Moon landings were faked, simply wouldn’t believe the images were real either, & would claim that THEY were faked too…🤞🤥 just as “Flat Earthers” refuse to accept the authenticity of even Amateur Astronomers’ planetary images posted on the Internet, let alone any images taken by NASA. 😂 CONCLUSION: Nowadays, people tend to believe what they WANT to believe - IRRESPECTIVE of any compelling evidence to the contrary. While a certain amount of *discerning* skepticism & *diligent research* is a wise approach to take nowadays - since we live in times of MONSTROUS worldwide deceptions & the widespread endorsement of LUNATIC FRINGE ideologies, all of which have no basis in empirically established science or even Common Sense - nonetheless, there are matters that are sufficiently well documented, so compellingly rational & logical, that they should be taken at face value. HOWEVER: “You can lead a Horse to Water… But you can’t MAKE IT drink.” 🫲😊 🤷🏻‍♂️

So lazy. Do your own research.

@@bazpearce9993 lol ok so you don't know, thanks

@@sourdoughbornsourdoughbred4712 I know how to find out. Takes less time than your reply.

@@bazpearce9993 I didn't want a Google answer. Obviously. That's why I asked. And you call me lazy. You could've told me by now. How about acting like a human being rather than an animal. Thanks

Thanks you very much!

Thanks!😊

@@Friggitoriamarina69 Grazie mille!

Grazie mille Valerio, troppo buono!☺

I'll send you the list of my usual settings : [ZWO ASI174MM] Auto Exp Max Exp = 30ms Auto Exp Max Gain = 255 Auto Exp Target Brightness = 100 Bin = 1 Brightness = 10 Capture Limit = 1000frames Colour Format = RAW8 Exposure = 8.376ms Flip = None Gain = 147 Hardware Bin = OFF High Speed Mode = ON Output Format = *.AVI

Grazie!🙂

great telescope ! 👍

@@giorgiomengoli which mount do you use for your c11?

@@shrekshrek Skywatcher AZ-EQ6 GT

Ok!🙂

@@RealEel-m5e Thank you so much!

Grazie Valerio! In effetti ci stavo pensando e se ci saranno le condizioni favorevoli: meteo e seeing, vedrò di fare questa prova. Infatti sono curioso anch'io di cosa potrebbe uscire!

@@giorgiomengoli molto bene!!! 😁👍🏻

Thank you so much !

Thank you so much !

Vicino San Giovanni Valdarno!

Grazie mille!🙂

Thank you so much !

@@binomania Grazie mille!

Thanks!🙂

Hello, we appreciate you subscribing and your compliments. Due to the low luminosity of the Andromeda galaxy (M31), capturing it necessitates extended exposure times. This makes it feasible for still photography but precludes videography. Best wishes for your celestial observations.

@@giorgiomengoli uzaylılar varmı? ölmeden görebilicekmiyim? ne dersiniz?

Thank you so much !🙂