Sarah's Space Documentaries
Sarah's Space Documentaries
  • 11
  • 52 995

Відео

Neil deGrasse Tyson on what you can see with X-Ray Vision
Переглядів 405 років тому
Neil deGrasse Tyson on what you can see with X-Ray Vision
Neil deGrasse Tyson - What is the most POWERFUL Telescope?
Переглядів 2,5 тис.5 років тому
Neil deGrasse Tyson - What is the most POWERFUL Telescope?
Neil deGrasse Tyson on RARE animals that see more colours than humans
Переглядів 485 років тому
Neil deGrasse Tyson on RARE animals that see more colours than humans
Neil deGrasse Tyson - Is there a chance Earth will fall into the sun by 2037?
Переглядів 1,2 тис.5 років тому
Neil deGrasse Tyson - Is there a chance Earth will fall into the sun by 2037?
Neil deGrasse Tyson - Could a human survive on Pluto?
Переглядів 885 років тому
Neil deGrasse Tyson - Could a human survive on Pluto?
Neil Degrasse Tyson Stumped on a 4 year old boys question about physics
Переглядів 2925 років тому
Neil Degrasse Tyson Stumped on a 4 year old boys question about physics
Neil Degrasse Tyson on is Earth expanding with the universe?
Переглядів 3,8 тис.5 років тому
Neil Degrasse Tyson on is Earth expanding with the universe?
Neil Degrasse Tyson - Is there an alternative to the Big Bang?
Переглядів 3,7 тис.5 років тому
Neil Degrasse Tyson - Is there an alternative to the Big Bang?
Neil Degrasse Tyson - Is Math A Discovery Or An Invention?
Переглядів 41 тис.5 років тому
Neil Degrasse Tyson - Is Math A Discovery Or An Invention?
How hard would I have to fart to achieve escape velocity? W/ Neil Degrasse Tyson
Переглядів 3005 років тому
How hard would I have to fart to achieve escape velocity? W/ Neil Degrasse Tyson

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @mikecamacho1934
    @mikecamacho1934 Місяць тому

    It's an observation with an explanation that has been standardized and refined over time. Like literature or Music with structure and rules to create consistent communication and understanding.

  • @badguard
    @badguard 2 місяці тому

    Wow just wow , the wonders of the universe

  • @thetransferaccount4586
    @thetransferaccount4586 2 місяці тому

    unfruitful discussions that's it

  • @RodrigoSantos-up8cf
    @RodrigoSantos-up8cf 2 місяці тому

    kkkkkkkkkkk 2:30

  • @ScotShaw-iu9xm
    @ScotShaw-iu9xm 3 місяці тому

    The best word to describe math might be an interpretation of our world, not an invention or a simple existence

  • @AgravioJohnMarionM.
    @AgravioJohnMarionM. 3 місяці тому

    Math that "we have right now" is an absolute invention, we can actually make our own math that matches the math that the early inventors made as long as you are smart enough you can make one.

    • @Unamedblue3
      @Unamedblue3 2 місяці тому

      No we can't. Because maths that we don't have right now. Is undiscovered. Wanna know why we can't just invent it? Because if you just "invent" a new piece of math. And it doesn't like up with everything else? It's wrong. Following this logic. Why can't 1x1 be 3?

  • @Futzebra2373
    @Futzebra2373 4 місяці тому

    The Name of the Asian guy?

  • @Oscar.AnangeloftheLord.Perez.1
    @Oscar.AnangeloftheLord.Perez.1 5 місяців тому

    So you are saying you invented 2+2=4

  • @bobrainy5324
    @bobrainy5324 5 місяців тому

    The Earth is expanding. More like growing. It has grown 2-3 times it's original size mostly from only 250 million years ago. It's the growing Earth theory and its TRUE. Neil, I hope you read this. You can't prove me wrong. You know it must be true.

  • @Tattooniac
    @Tattooniac 6 місяців тому

    i figured out terrence howard. terrence howard is trying to change mathematics by using physics. even though the 2 doesnt correlate by what some scholars say, but they use math to calculate every single thing and to decode the universe. so i dont know hy people say physics and math dont correlate. , maybe thats whats missing. by creating math out of nothing in a moving universe that never stops, make us miscalculate everything we have ever created that we thought was still. our reality sees still objects because we dont see the 4th dimensions. we are looking at the world in a 2D and 3D world that we think is not moving.. howard is trying to see it through a 4D perspective. he has the ability to change everything in his world. terrence literally created saturn from his lynchpin method. and yes he will be seen as crazy for now. just wait til hes able to prove his stuff.

  • @kmjohnny
    @kmjohnny 6 місяців тому

    The basics were discovered, over time things were invented in it.

  • @CousinLouisDaFreshPrince
    @CousinLouisDaFreshPrince 7 місяців тому

    Neil is right, math is an infinite language that describes itself and only itself using patterns. It’s nether discovered nor invented. Its explanation can only be revealed by mathematics itself, no word in our conscious vocabulary can define it. It just describes itself in every equation.

  • @WaveFunctionCollapsed
    @WaveFunctionCollapsed 7 місяців тому

    Math : Discovered Numbers : invented

  • @banksuvladimir
    @banksuvladimir 7 місяців тому

    When you think about it, all “invention” is discovery. You’re using something the universe was already capable of

  • @TommyBoppinDoe
    @TommyBoppinDoe 8 місяців тому

    A lot of beans or just a few orders of Taco Bell.

  • @squwooshk
    @squwooshk 8 місяців тому

    Math is a descriptive subjective system we've invented to describe the phenomenon in our observable universe. It's isn't some sort of divine objective prescriptive system that we discovered. It's our complex answers to complex questions arived at by our logic

    • @beetlesstrengthandpower1890
      @beetlesstrengthandpower1890 7 місяців тому

      Well, you can also say that the we have build a language/descriptive system, to examine something inherent to the universe (math). I think the main discussion here is the definition of math

    • @squwooshk
      @squwooshk 7 місяців тому

      @@beetlesstrengthandpower1890 The thing is that we have to interpret everything through our limited knowledge and understanding. To claim math is some inherent truth of the universe, rather than simply a man made system to explain universal phenomenon is absurd. This is a deeply philosophical question. I reject the concept of a "true world" beyond that of the apparent world. There are no systems of objective truths beyond our human perceptions.

  • @shyshka_
    @shyshka_ 9 місяців тому

    Fundamental math concepts are most definetly discovered, more abstract models and number theory and so on just might be invented on top of that. Like the Pythagorean theorem would still exist even if humans never existed, concepts of geometry would still be the same, Pi would still be the same.. etc.

  • @kennyalbano1922
    @kennyalbano1922 9 місяців тому

    Related question for other commenters: are birds invented or discovered? Every single bird like every living thing on this planet can be said to be directly descended from its parents in many cases parent. Yet there exists an unbroken chain connecting every life on Earth to the same first ancestor. That bird had a mom who was a bird of a particular species however many generations is hard to give an exact answer and can only be given by an approximation. At some point most biologists would likely claim a bird of one species had an ancestor that belonged to a different species. This same reasoning can be applied beyond bird species to every species on Earth in the same manner. We may be comfortable saying a given individual is a bird of a given species but the species is less easily defined. It is real in that it is useful as a way to understand the world and to develop further ideas related to life, the animal kingdom, and birds, but it could be argued the bird was an invention despite agreeing with measurements and experiments. The bird is an abstraction that repeatedly produces results that correspond to reality yet I would argue is a human invention the same way math is. Math is a tool with great agreement and correspondence with nature. On the other hand there can be multiple systems of axioms on which a branch of mathematics may rest. Do all such systems of axioms including even those that may not correspond with reality have their own independent truth even if they are untestable or if they were to fail repeated experimentation? Does math have a standard of truth separate from that of science? Would you say she blinded me with math? 😉

  • @James-ll3jb
    @James-ll3jb 10 місяців тому

    Neil meets his match among fellow superficialists at last😅

  • @MarAwanaDISPOCO.
    @MarAwanaDISPOCO. 11 місяців тому

    Its an Anomaly, Constantly tested in constantly used on different scales.

  • @MarAwanaDISPOCO.
    @MarAwanaDISPOCO. 11 місяців тому

    Yeah the people who figured out a lot of shit would look at nature

  • @MarAwanaDISPOCO.
    @MarAwanaDISPOCO. 11 місяців тому

    Blue lotus wings 🪽

  • @jayb5596
    @jayb5596 11 місяців тому

    We have a perfectly good model of how a mathematical framework can exist outside of the conscious experience. That's what we have created with computational devices. Just imagine yourselves as beings, made of pixel dust existing inside a matrix. Then you realize your thoughts come from underlying binary code also known as dark matter. You should know a physical architecture or server system can expand from the outside and that expansion is reflected on the inside. That's what dark energy represents, it's not only our container, but it's why the universe is expanding exponentially. The difference is you cannot physically interact with it internally. Through the mind and thoughts we can interact with the mathematical framework. E=MC² hence matter and energy are interchangeable. Light is used as a metaphor for intellect, wisdom and consciousness, without light (electromagnetic radiation), the mathematical framework we use everyday known as computational architectures, wouldn't be accessible to us in such a rich and interactive operating system experience. These architectures show us what mathematical frameworks look like from the outside in. This universe shows us what a mathematical framework looks like, from the inside out.

  • @chriscapablanca3491
    @chriscapablanca3491 Рік тому

    Math was pre-existing. So math itself, the quantities are not really discovered or invented but Realized. The style in which we choose to code, or write down, the math concepts like a language of symbols are our human invention for the relationship of quantities that we realized. Similar to going outside in the sun and noticing your shadow. You didn't discover your shadow. You didn't invent the shadow. You realized a phenomenon that occurs when certain conditions are met, a phenomenon that was pre-existing.

  • @alanweis7856
    @alanweis7856 Рік тому

    I have learned a lot of wisdom from old tales and religious quotes with a deep meaning my favourite was this, and I write it in hungarian because it sounds better: "Az ember tudatlannak születik, nem ostobának, ostobává az oktatás teszi". This sums up the operation we have here very well. The other thing I have learned when I went down alone to an illegal underground party was "sacred geometry". So, those people who exist behind the door says "do not enter" is actually people who possess wisdom that is sacred. You guys are doing media here. You not gonna know the world behind closed doors. You shouldn't.

  • @VisibleMRJ
    @VisibleMRJ Рік тому

    It’s obviously a discovention

  • @scottweszka7036
    @scottweszka7036 Рік тому

    Math is like time and space !!! Without time and space there is no math !! Time and space the closer something is less time is needed if touching you no time needed at all or math coz nothing to work out !!! To me it's obvious time and space are the same thing !! Playing football you learn to run into the space so you have more time on the ball !!!!!!

  • @Butmunch666
    @Butmunch666 Рік тому

    Math is the substrate from which the universe springs forth.

  • @WilmerCook
    @WilmerCook Рік тому

    Did the earth blow up like a balloon? I see it on the internet all the time.

  • @correctpolitically4784
    @correctpolitically4784 Рік тому

    Why do people act like neil is a genius ? Hes a scientist in 1 field not every field.

  • @nickb220
    @nickb220 Рік тому

    Dude gave his son an ultimatum between math and astrophysics LOL

  • @darthtropper
    @darthtropper Рік тому

    Why is the big bang theory stuffed down our throat amwe have other theories which I accept are not perfect bit neither is the big bang

  • @daleburnfart6845
    @daleburnfart6845 Рік тому

    Think about how silly it would be to say Isaac Newton invented gravity... It was always there at a very specific reliable value making it a discovery. I believe math also is a discovery in the same way that 4 bananas plus 4 bananas always equaled 8 bananas. We just discovered a way to explain it. To invent math means you could assign any value to anything you want and call it true despite the entire universe laughing at you.

  • @greekgod300george6
    @greekgod300george6 Рік тому

    GREEKS INVENTED MATH 💪🏼🇬🇷🇨🇾

  • @p3rryksy
    @p3rryksy Рік тому

    what about programming language isn't it completely arbitrary?

  • @danielw7060
    @danielw7060 Рік тому

    We invented the kickoff version of it to account for things like sheep but all of the laws existed beforehand, explorations of it's possibilities led to discoveries, not inventions of universal laws.

  • @reddish8692
    @reddish8692 Рік тому

    Math is definitely a discovery. It exists, whether we knew about it or not.

    • @GKhalxo
      @GKhalxo Рік тому

      Ure as dumb as the people who raised you... Or maybe a bit more I guess

    • @teoman_acikgoz
      @teoman_acikgoz Рік тому

      What math describes, yes.

    • @FindingsOfAnArmouredMind
      @FindingsOfAnArmouredMind Рік тому

      No, that's objectively wrong. Mathematics are a linguistic system (just as much as verbal communication/language and music theory) made by man and, thus, it's artifficial. What there certainly exists are the LAWS of nature, mathematics is just the system we made to better and more easily explain the LAWS of the nature that we can observe and identify with our minds. Every linguistic system we made is just to explain the laws of nature that we could observe with OUR MINDS first.

    • @FindingsOfAnArmouredMind
      @FindingsOfAnArmouredMind Рік тому

      @yoshi_drinks_tea YOU GET IT

  • @raizenpau
    @raizenpau 2 роки тому

    What's the name of the first man who spoke? For research purposes only.

  • @nightone9720
    @nightone9720 2 роки тому

    "In order to get ahold of the wiggly world you've gotta put a net over it" - And so, the the art of calculus was born. Now we can number the holes of the net, so many so holes up, so many so holes across, and now we can measure, calculate, and talk about the wiggly world in regards to the net. The funniest part of all is that as human beings we tend to try and straighten out the wiggly world and build in straight lines with right angles, but each and every one of us is wiggly as all get out. The wiggliest wiggle of them all tries to straighten out a wiggly world. Lol This is Alan Watts by the way. One of his philosophical lectures on calculus and the universe. It is wonderful.

  • @nightone9720
    @nightone9720 2 роки тому

    I like that Asian guy lol. I know who Neil is already and have much respect for him but that discovention joke was freaking hilarious!

  • @retardsofyoutube
    @retardsofyoutube 2 роки тому

    What about the theory of the Big Bounce in which universes emerge from Black Holes? I wonder how they don't come to mention that

  • @jayyemm69
    @jayyemm69 2 роки тому

    The way Neil didn’t even want to comment on the discovention, so he just kept on talking but was interrupted by singing instead so he tried to talk through that and couldn’t… he paused for one second and then just continued his sentence as if nothing had happened 😂😂😂

  • @MariaGonzalez-nf6qo
    @MariaGonzalez-nf6qo 2 роки тому

    Is this a podcast? Where can I find it??? Neil Degrase Tyson please start your own podcast and talk about space !!!!

  • @spiritualanarchist8162
    @spiritualanarchist8162 2 роки тому

    Big bong

  • @joachimmikalsen1676
    @joachimmikalsen1676 2 роки тому

    Invention. This is really not a hard question.

  • @joachimmikalsen1676
    @joachimmikalsen1676 2 роки тому

    Neil Degrasse is wrong here. The universe does not "follow" rules. This is actually hard for som people to grasp. Grasp it - don´t Degrasse it.

  • @voluntarism335
    @voluntarism335 2 роки тому

    Everything is discovered nothing is invented

  • @thomas.alexander.
    @thomas.alexander. 2 роки тому

    I'd like to hear these guys discuss Roger Penrose's idea of an endlessly repeating universe of multiple big bangs... I thought the evidence had disproved the idea of a Big Crunch?!?

  • @jgilgorri
    @jgilgorri 2 роки тому

    Math is a pidgin between the language of the universe and the language of our minds.

    • @menzisaclown
      @menzisaclown 2 роки тому

      This the best thing ive read all day

  • @jettmthebluedragon
    @jettmthebluedragon 2 роки тому

    First off you fail to understand something the ( observable) universe not the WHOLE universe totally different 😑it’s ether the WHOLE universe is finite or not 😐and no matter how far you look the speed of light will always be finite 😑so no matter how far away we see our range will be limited and if the observable universe is the whole universe then we sure live in a very small universe 😐